• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Feasibility and Safety of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Distal Transradial Access.经远端桡动脉途径进行慢性完全闭塞冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性与安全性
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 May 10;8:673858. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.673858. eCollection 2021.
2
Feasibility of Distal Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Single Center Experience.桡动脉远端入路用于冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性:单中心经验
Cardiology. 2021;146(5):531-537. doi: 10.1159/000517076. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
3
Procedural Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Chronic Total Occlusions Via the Radial Approach: Insights From an International Chronic Total Occlusion Registry.经桡动脉入路行慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的操作结果:来自国际慢性完全闭塞病变注册研究的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 25;12(4):346-358. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.019.
4
Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion of coronary artery disease using sheathless standard guiding catheters.使用无鞘标准引导导管经桡动脉行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗冠心病慢性完全闭塞病变
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2014 Dec 30;6:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2014.12.001. eCollection 2015 Mar 1.
5
Transradial approach for coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: Insights from a contemporary multicenter registry.经桡动脉途径用于冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变介入治疗:来自当代多中心注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;85(7):1123-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25827. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
6
Outcomes of distal versus conventional transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.经桡动脉远端与传统入路行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的结局比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Dec 1;344:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.10.003. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
7
Safety and feasibility of a 7F thin-walled sheath distal transradial artery access for complex coronary intervention.用于复杂冠状动脉介入治疗的7F薄壁鞘经桡动脉远端入路的安全性和可行性。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 12;9:959197. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.959197. eCollection 2022.
8
First prospective multicenter experience with the 7 French Glidesheath slender for complex transradial coronary interventions.首次将7F Glidesheath Slender应用于复杂经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗的前瞻性多中心经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;89(6):1014-1020. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26773. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
9
Feasibility and Safety of Distal Radial Artery Access in Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Angiography and Coronary Intervention.用于冠状动脉造影和冠状动脉介入的解剖鼻烟壶内桡动脉远端入路的可行性和安全性
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020 Sep 8;18(2):259-262. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v18i1.2402.
10
Transradial access through the anatomical snuffbox: Results of a feasibility study.经解剖鼻烟窝行桡动脉入路:一项可行性研究的结果。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2021 May-Jun;62(3):201-205. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence of Radial Artery Occlusion in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Trans Radial Access.经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉介入治疗患者桡动脉闭塞的发生率
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Mar-Apr;39(2):377-379. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.2.7219.
2
Rotational atherectomy for chronically and totally occluded coronary lesions: A propensity score-matched outcomes study.慢性完全闭塞性冠状动脉病变的旋磨术:一项倾向评分匹配的结局研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 21;9:1061812. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1061812. eCollection 2022.
3
Switching From Proximal to Distal Radial Artery Access for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Recanalization.从桡动脉近端入路转换为远端入路用于冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变再通
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 9;9:895457. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.895457. eCollection 2022.
4
Advancement in Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the Distal Transradial Artery Access in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Complex Coronary Artery Disease.经桡动脉远端入路行冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征和复杂冠状动脉疾病的进展。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2022 Mar;26(3):163-171. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.933.

本文引用的文献

1
Distal radial artery access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography and intervention: A single center experience.在解剖鼻烟壶区行经桡动脉远端入路进行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗:单中心经验
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(3):e18330. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018330.
2
Distal transradial artery access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography as an alternative access site for faster hemostasis.经解剖鼻烟窝行远端桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影术作为一种更快止血的替代入路。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 1;94(5):651-657. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28155. Epub 2019 Feb 24.
3
Feasibility of Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Left Snuffbox Approach.经左鼻烟壶入路行冠状动脉造影及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性
Korean Circ J. 2018 Dec;48(12):1120-1130. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0181. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
4
Impact of single-plane versus Bi-plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.单平面与双平面成像对逆向慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中手术时间、透视时间及造影剂用量的影响
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Dec;31(6):799-806. doi: 10.1111/joic.12545. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
5
Comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approach in treatment of chronic total occlusions with similar lesion characteristics.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径治疗具有相似病变特征的慢性完全闭塞病变的比较。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2018 May;19(5):319-325. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.02779.
6
Fully Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Percutaneous Intervention of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions Applying the Hybrid Algorithm: Insights From RECHARGE Registry.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径行冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变介入治疗的杂交算法:RECHARGE 注册研究的结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep;10(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005255.
7
Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI).经解剖鼻烟窝行左侧远端桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影(ldTRA)和介入治疗(ldTRI)。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Sep 20;13(7):851-857. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00079.
8
Numbness after Transradial Cardiac Catheterization: the Results from a Nerve Conduction Study of the Superficial Radial Nerve.经桡动脉心脏导管插入术后的麻木感:来自桡神经浅支神经传导研究的结果
Korean Circ J. 2016 Mar;46(2):161-8. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.2.161. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
9
The definition of acute kidney injury and its use in practice.急性肾损伤的定义及其在实践中的应用。
Kidney Int. 2015 Jan;87(1):62-73. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.328. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
10
Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.心肌梗死的第三次全球定义。
Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2551-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184. Epub 2012 Aug 24.

经远端桡动脉途径进行慢性完全闭塞冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性与安全性

Feasibility and Safety of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Distal Transradial Access.

作者信息

Lin Cheng-Jui, Lee Wei-Chieh, Lee Chieh-Ho, Chung Wen-Jung, Hsueh Shu-Kai, Chen Chien-Jen, Yang Cheng-Hsu, Fang Hsiu-Yu, Cheng Cheng-I, Wu Chiung-Jen

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 May 10;8:673858. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.673858. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2021.673858
PMID:34041286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8141614/
Abstract

The current study aims to verify the feasibility and safety of chronic total occlusion (CTO)-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via the distal transradial access (dTRA). Between April 2017 and December 2019, 298 patients who underwent CTO PCI via dTRA were enrolled in this study. The baseline demographic and procedural characteristics were listed and compared between groups. The incidences of access-site vascular complications and procedural complications and mortality were recorded. The mean J-CTO (Japanese chronic total occlusion) score was 2.6 ± 0.9 points. The mean access time was 4.6 ± 2.9 min, and the mean procedure time was 115.9 ± 55.6 min. Left radial snuffbox access was performed successfully in 286 patients (96.5%), and right radial snuffbox access was performed successfully in 133 patients (97.7%). Bilateral radial snuffbox access was performed in 107 patients (35.9%). 400 dTRA (95.5%) received glidesheath for CTO intervention. Two patients (0.7%) developed severe access-site vascular complications. None of the patients experienced severe radial artery spasm and only 2 patients (0.5%) developed radial artery occlusion during the follow-up period. The overall procedural success rate was 93.5%. The procedural success rate was 96.5% in patients with antegrade approach and 87.7% in patients with retrograde approach. It is both safe and feasible to use dTRA plus Glidesheath for complex CTO intervention. The incidences of procedure-related complications and severe access-site vascular complications, and distal radial artery occlusion were low.

摘要

本研究旨在验证经远端桡动脉入路(dTRA)行慢性完全闭塞(CTO)-经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的可行性和安全性。2017年4月至2019年12月,298例行dTRA CTO PCI的患者纳入本研究。列出并比较了各组的基线人口统计学和手术特征。记录了穿刺部位血管并发症、手术并发症及死亡率的发生率。平均日本CTO(J-CTO)评分为2.6±0.9分。平均穿刺时间为4.6±2.9分钟,平均手术时间为115.9±55.6分钟。286例患者(96.5%)成功进行了左桡动脉鼻烟窝穿刺,133例患者(97.7%)成功进行了右桡动脉鼻烟窝穿刺。107例患者(35.9%)进行了双侧桡动脉鼻烟窝穿刺。400例(95.5%)dTRA接受了Glidesheath进行CTO介入治疗。2例患者(0.7%)发生严重穿刺部位血管并发症。随访期间,无一例患者发生严重桡动脉痉挛,仅2例患者(0.5%)发生桡动脉闭塞。总体手术成功率为93.5%。顺行路径患者的手术成功率为96.5%,逆行路径患者的手术成功率为87.7%。使用dTRA加Glidesheath进行复杂CTO介入治疗既安全又可行。手术相关并发症、严重穿刺部位血管并发症及桡动脉远端闭塞的发生率较低。