Guiding vacuum-assisted biopsy in prone position: digital breast tomosynthesis vs stereotactic.

PURPOSE

To compare the performance of prone digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)-vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) with prone stereotactic-guided VAB (sVAB), focusing on time of procedure, number of expositions, average glandular dose, and complications.

METHODS

The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and informed consent was waived. From July 2015 to January 2017, 306 patients with 306 suspicious mammographic findings (BI-RADS ⩾4) underwent mammography-guided biopsy, prone sVAB, or prone DBT-VAB. Student test, chi-square, and multivariate regression statistics were used.

RESULTS

During the study period, 155 prone sVAB procedures in 155 patients (mean age, 56 years; age range, 39-84 years) and 151 DBT-VABs in 151 patients (mean age, 57 years; age range, 33-84 years) were performed. Mean procedure time was shorter with DBT-VAB versus sVAB (14.5 versus 17.4 minutes, respectively; < 0.001), and fewer images were acquired with DBT-VAB versus sVAB (8 vs 11, respectively; < 0.001); the average glandular dose was significantly lower in DBT-VAB versus sVAB (11.8 mGy versus 18 mGy, respectively; < 0.001). There were no differences in the distribution of histologic results ( = 0.74) or breast density ( = 0.09) between the two groups. No major complications were observed in either group.

CONCLUSION

Performance of prone DBT-VAB was superior to prone sVAB because it allowed a faster procedure with fewer radiologic expositions and lower radiation dose.