Suppr超能文献

数字乳腺断层合成引导下真空辅助活检的临床性能:日本单机构经验。

Clinical performance of digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy: a single-institution experience in Japan.

机构信息

Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazakokarimata, Nagakute-City, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.

Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazakokarimata, Nagakute-City, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Jan 5;23(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00896-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (DBT-VAB) for microcalcifications in the breast.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 131 mammography-guided VABs at our institution were performed. All of the targets were calcification lesion suspicious for cancer. 45 consecutive stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsies (ST-VABs) and 86 consecutive DBT-VABs were compared. Written informed consent was obtained. Tissue sampling methods and materials were the same with both systems. Student's t-test was used to compare procedure time and the Fisher's exact test was used to compare success rate, complications, and histopathologic findings for the 2 methods.

RESULTS

The tissue sampling success rate was 95.6% for ST-VAB (43/45) and 97.7% (84/86) for DBT-VAB. Time for positioning (10.6 ± 6.4 vs. 6.7 ± 5.3 min), time for biopsy (33.4 ± 13.1 vs. 22.5 ± 13.1 min), and overall procedure time (66.6 ± 16.6 min vs. 54.5 ± 13.0 min) were substantially shorter with DBT-VAB (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in the distribution of pathological findings between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Depth information and stable visibility of the target provided by DBT images led to quick decisions about target coordinates and improved the clinical performance of microcalcification biopsies.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估数字乳腺断层合成引导真空辅助活检(DBT-VAB)在乳腺微钙化病变中的临床性能。

方法

对我院 131 例乳腺 X 线摄影引导真空辅助活检(VAB)进行回顾性分析。所有靶标均为可疑钙化的癌性病变。对比了 45 例连续立体定向真空辅助活检(ST-VAB)和 86 例连续 DBT-VAB。所有患者均签署了知情同意书。两种系统的组织取样方法和材料相同。采用 Student's t 检验比较两种方法的手术时间,采用 Fisher 确切概率法比较成功率、并发症和组织病理学结果。

结果

ST-VAB 的组织取样成功率为 95.6%(43/45),DBT-VAB 的成功率为 97.7%(84/86)。定位时间(10.6 ± 6.4 比 6.7 ± 5.3 分钟)、活检时间(33.4 ± 13.1 比 22.5 ± 13.1 分钟)和总手术时间(66.6 ± 16.6 比 54.5 ± 13.0 分钟)在 DBT-VAB 中显著缩短(P < 0.0001)。两组的组织学发现分布无差异。

结论

DBT 图像提供的目标深度信息和稳定的可视性使目标坐标的决策更快,提高了微钙化病变活检的临床性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5800/9817251/3e0a8022dd4e/12880_2022_896_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验