Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, E.N.T. Department, Shenzhen, China.
Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, E.N.T. Department, Shenzhen, China.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S70-S81. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
Evidence of programmed death-1 inhibitors in nasopharyngeal carcinoma has been accumulated. However, previous clinical studies were basically small sample size.
This study aimed to summarize existing studies to comprehensively compare programmed death-1 inhibitors in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with or without chemotherapy.
Different databases were searched for full-text publications with a programmed death-1 inhibitor with or without chemotherapy. No study-to-study heterogeneity was detected, and fixed-effect models were applied to synthesize data.
Seven studies were included. The mean progression-free survival duration of programmed death-1 inhibitors treatment was 4.66 months. The 6 month progression-free survival rate was 50%, however, the12 month progression-free survival rate fell to 27%. Comparing with programmed death-1 inhibitor monotherapy, the objective response rate was higher in combination therapy (pooled RR=2.90, 95% CI: 2.07-4.08). The partial response rate was higher in patients receiving programmed death-1 in association with chemotherapy (pooled RR=3.09, 95% CI: 2.15-4.46), In contrast, the progressive disease rate was lower in combination therapy group (pooled RR=0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.31). Stable disease condition was comparable (pooled RR=0.90, 95% CI: 0.50-1.64) with or without chemotherapy. Programmed death-1 single use or combined with chemotherapy did not influence the total adverse events occurrence (pooled RR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.93-1.05). However, combination therapy could increase the risk of serious adverse events such as anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia.
The present study summarized the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 inhibitors in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Combination therapy showed higher anti-tumor activity except for higher risk of myelosuppression.
已有大量关于程序性死亡受体-1 抑制剂(PD-1 抑制剂)在鼻咽癌中应用的证据。然而,之前的临床研究基本都是小样本量。
本研究旨在综合比较 PD-1 抑制剂联合或不联合化疗治疗鼻咽癌的现有研究。
检索了包含 PD-1 抑制剂联合或不联合化疗的完整文献的数据库。未检测到研究间异质性,应用固定效应模型对数据进行综合。
纳入了 7 项研究。PD-1 抑制剂治疗的中位无进展生存期为 4.66 个月。6 个月无进展生存率为 50%,但 12 个月无进展生存率下降至 27%。与 PD-1 抑制剂单药治疗相比,联合治疗的客观缓解率更高(合并 RR=2.90,95%CI:2.07-4.08)。联合治疗组患者的部分缓解率更高(合并 RR=3.09,95%CI:2.15-4.46),而疾病进展率更低(合并 RR=0.06,95%CI:0.01-0.31)。联合治疗组和单纯化疗组的稳定疾病发生率相似(合并 RR=0.90,95%CI:0.50-1.64)。PD-1 抑制剂单药或联合化疗均不影响总不良事件的发生(合并 RR=0.99,95%CI:0.93-1.05)。然而,联合治疗会增加贫血、血小板减少和中性粒细胞减少等严重不良事件的风险。
本研究总结了 PD-1 抑制剂在鼻咽癌中的疗效和安全性。联合治疗除了骨髓抑制风险增加外,显示出更高的抗肿瘤活性。