Institute for Environmental Decisions, Consumer Behavior, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Institute for Environmental Decisions, Consumer Behavior, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 15;118(24). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100411118.
Because of the outbreak of COVID-19, most countries have implemented measures aimed at reducing the number of infected people. However, these measures only work if they are generally accepted by the public. We conducted a two-wave longitudinal survey in Switzerland ( = 1,223) to study the factors that would influence perceived risks and the acceptance of the measures. Our findings showed that people with individualistic worldviews, high general interpersonal trust, low social trust, a low level of perceived risks, and the conviction that risks other than health risks were neglected had less acceptance of the implemented measures compared with people who held the opposite views on the mentioned variables. The number of infected people declined between survey waves 1 and 2. This desired effect not only reduced people's perceived risks but also decreased their social trust and increased the conviction that other risks were neglected. Finally, the acceptance of the measures declined. Our data also support the idea that reduced risk perceptions and a decline in social trust are important drivers for the reduction in the acceptance of the measures in survey wave 2. Our results suggest that as soon as the measures attain success or the public is tired of the implemented restrictions, public acceptance declines, and it seems difficult to prolong the measures as may be desirable from an epidemiological standpoint. The importance of worldviews and trust for public acceptance of the measures further suggests the necessity of a political discussion about the implemented measures.
由于 COVID-19 的爆发,大多数国家都实施了旨在减少感染人数的措施。然而,这些措施只有在被公众普遍接受的情况下才有效。我们在瑞士进行了两次纵向调查(= 1223),以研究影响感知风险和措施接受度的因素。我们的研究结果表明,与具有相反观点的人相比,具有个人主义世界观、高度一般人际信任、低度社会信任、低度感知风险以及认为健康风险以外的风险被忽视的人,对所实施的措施的接受度较低。感染人数在调查第一波和第二波之间有所下降。这种理想的效果不仅降低了人们的感知风险,还降低了他们的社会信任度,增加了对其他风险被忽视的信念。最后,措施的接受度下降了。我们的数据还支持这样一种观点,即降低风险感知和社会信任度的下降是导致第二波调查中措施接受度下降的重要驱动因素。我们的研究结果表明,一旦措施取得成功或公众对实施的限制感到厌倦,公众的接受度就会下降,似乎很难像从流行病学角度来看那样延长这些措施。世界观和信任对措施接受度的重要性进一步表明,有必要就所实施的措施进行政治讨论。