99 Glenwood Road, Ridgewood, NJ, USA.
University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Neuromodulation Division, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, USA.
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 May 28;11(1):330. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01441-4.
Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) may be refractory to or have contraindications that preclude treatment with antidepressant pharmacotherapies. Alternative therapies such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) continue to evolve, and include theta burst stimulation (TBS), which has advantages over conventional rTMS. The aim of this study was to identify and meta-analyze efficacy data from all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating TBS as a treatment for MDD. Published reports of RCTs (January 1, 2010 to October 23, 2020) were identified via systematic searches in computerized databases, followed by review of individual reports for inclusion. Inclusion criteria included primary diagnosis of MDD ≥ 1 week duration of therapy with ≥10 sessions, and treatment with any form of TBS. The Cochrane GRADE methodology and PRISMA criteria were used for evaluation of individual trials. Data from ten RCTs were included, representing 667 patients. Of these, 8 RCTs compared TBS to sham treatment and one compared TBS to standard rTMS (i.e., high frequency stimulation over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [HFL]). Quality of evidence assessment yielded high confidence in the finding of TBS being superior to sham on response measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HRSD) (RR = 2.4; 95% CI: 1.27 to 4.55; P = 0.007; I = 40%). Comparison of HRSD response rates for TBS versus rTMS produced no statistically significant difference (RR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.23; P = 0.80; I = 0%). The incidence of adverse events between TBS and rTMS was not statistically different. The findings of a positive effect of TBS vs. sham, and noninferiority of TBS vs. standard HFL rTMS support the continued development of TBS to treat depression.
患有重度抑郁症(MDD)的患者可能对抗抑郁药治疗有抗药性或有禁忌症。替代疗法如重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)不断发展,包括 theta 爆发刺激(TBS),它具有优于传统 rTMS 的优势。本研究旨在确定并荟萃分析所有随机对照试验(RCT)中关于 TBS 治疗 MDD 的疗效数据。通过计算机数据库系统检索,确定了 RCT 的已发表报告(2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 23 日),然后对纳入的个别报告进行审查。纳入标准包括主要诊断为 MDD、治疗时间≥1 周、治疗次数≥10 次、以及任何形式的 TBS 治疗。采用 Cochrane GRADE 方法和 PRISMA 标准评估单个试验。纳入了 10 项 RCT,代表了 667 名患者。其中,8 项 RCT 将 TBS 与假对照进行比较,一项 RCT 将 TBS 与标准 rTMS(即左背外侧前额叶高频刺激 [HFL])进行比较。证据质量评估对 TBS 在汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HRSD)上的反应(RR=2.4;95%CI:1.27 至 4.55;P=0.007;I=40%)优于假对照的发现具有高度信心。TBS 与 rTMS 之间的 HRSD 反应率比较没有统计学上的显著差异(RR=1.02;95%CI:0.85 至 1.23;P=0.80;I=0%)。TBS 与 rTMS 之间的不良事件发生率无统计学差异。TBS 与假对照相比具有积极作用,TBS 与标准 HFL rTMS 相比非劣效性的发现支持继续开发 TBS 治疗抑郁症。