• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心耳封堵术预防心房颤动相关性卒中:法国左心耳封堵注册研究的最终报告。

Left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Final report from the French left atrial appendage closure registry.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, Creteil, France.

Department of Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Pessac, France.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct;98(4):788-799. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29795. Epub 2021 May 29.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.29795
PMID:34051135
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The French left atrial appendage (LAA) closure registry (FLAAC) aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of LAA closure in daily practice.

BACKGROUND

LAA closure has emerged as an alternative for preventing thromboembolic events (TE) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Clinical data in this field remains limited and few investigator-initiated, real-world registries have been reported.

METHODS

This nationwide, prospective study was performed in 36 French centers. The primary endpoint was the TE rate after successful LAA closure.

RESULTS

The FLAAC registry included 816 patients with a mean age of 75.5 ± 0.3 years, mean follow-up of 16.0 ± 0.3 months, high TE (CHA DS -VASc score: 4.6 ± 0.1) and bleeding risks (HAS-BLED score: 3.2 ± 0.05) and common contraindications to long-term anticoagulation (95.7%). Procedure or device-related serious adverse events occurred in 49 (6.0%) patients. The annual rate of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism was 3.3% (2.4-4.6). This suggests a relative 57% reduction compared to the risk of stroke in historical NVAF populations without antithrombotic therapy. By multivariate analysis, history of TE was the only factor associated with stroke/systemic embolism during follow-up (HR, 3.3 [1.58-6.89], p = 0.001). The annual mortality rate was 10.2% (8.4-12.3). Most of the deaths were due to comorbidities or underlying cardiovascular diseases and unrelated to the device or to TE.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that LAA closure can be an option in patients with NVAF. Long-term follow-up mortality was high, mostly due to comorbidities and underlying cardiovascular diseases, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary management after LAA closure.

REGISTRATION

NCT02252861.

摘要

目的

法国左心耳(LAA)封堵注册研究(FLAAC)旨在评估 LAA 封堵在日常实践中的安全性和有效性。

背景

LAA 封堵已成为预防非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者血栓栓塞事件(TE)的一种替代方法。该领域的临床数据仍然有限,仅有少数由研究者发起的真实世界注册研究报告。

方法

这是一项在法国 36 个中心进行的全国性前瞻性研究。主要终点是成功 LAA 封堵后的 TE 发生率。

结果

FLAAC 注册研究纳入 816 例患者,平均年龄 75.5±0.3 岁,平均随访 16.0±0.3 个月,TE(CHA2DS2-VASc 评分:4.6±0.1)和出血风险(HAS-BLED 评分:3.2±0.05)较高,且存在常见的长期抗凝禁忌证(95.7%)。49 例(6.0%)患者发生与操作或器械相关的严重不良事件。缺血性卒中和全身性栓塞的年发生率为 3.3%(2.4-4.6)。这表明与无抗血栓治疗的历史 NVAF 人群相比,风险降低了 57%。多变量分析显示,TE 史是随访期间发生卒中和全身性栓塞的唯一相关因素(HR,3.3[1.58-6.89],p=0.001)。年死亡率为 10.2%(8.4-12.3)。大多数死亡是由于合并症或基础心血管疾病导致,与器械或 TE 无关。

结论

我们的研究表明,LAA 封堵可作为 NVAF 患者的一种选择。长期随访死亡率较高,主要是由于合并症和基础心血管疾病,这突出了 LAA 封堵后多学科管理的重要性。

注册

NCT02252861。

相似文献

1
Left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Final report from the French left atrial appendage closure registry.左心耳封堵术预防心房颤动相关性卒中:法国左心耳封堵注册研究的最终报告。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct;98(4):788-799. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29795. Epub 2021 May 29.
2
Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Is a Reasonable Option for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation at High Risk for Cerebrovascular Events.经皮左心耳封堵术是高脑血管事件风险的房颤患者的合理选择。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar;11(3):e005841. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005841.
3
Efficacy and safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure to prevent thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation patients with high stroke and bleeding risk.经皮左心耳封堵术预防高卒中及出血风险房颤患者血栓栓塞事件的疗效与安全性。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Mar;105(3):225-9. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0910-8. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
4
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy in Continued Access Left Atrial Appendage Closure Registries.延续性左心耳封堵器使用登记研究的长期安全性和有效性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 10;74(23):2878-2889. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.064.
5
Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial.前瞻性随机评估 Watchman 左心耳封堵装置在房颤患者与长期华法林治疗中的效果:PREVAIL 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 8;64(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.029.
6
Long-term Event Reduction After Left Atrial Appendage Closure. Results of the Iberian Registry II.左心耳封堵术后的长期事件减少。伊比利亚注册研究II的结果。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Jun;72(6):449-455. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 May 10.
7
Atrial fibrillation evolution and rhythm control strategy following left appendage closure: new insights from the prospective FLAAC registry.左心耳封堵术后心房颤动的演变和节律控制策略:前瞻性 FLAAC 注册研究的新见解。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 May 3;21(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-01994-8.
8
5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials.左心耳封堵术后 5 年的结果:来自 PREVAIL 和 PROTECT AF 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 19;70(24):2964-2975. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
9
Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with the Amplatzer cardiac plug in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindications to anticoagulation.对于心房颤动且有抗凝治疗禁忌证的患者,使用Amplatzer心脏封堵器经皮左心耳封堵术的安全性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr 1;83(5):796-802. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25329. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
10
Left atrial appendage closure followed by 6 weeks of antithrombotic therapy: a prospective single-center experience.左心耳封堵联合 6 周抗栓治疗:前瞻性单中心经验。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Dec;10(12):1792-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.025. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Profiles of the WATCHMAN™ and Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug/Amplatzer™ Amulet™ Devices for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.WATCHMAN™和Amplatzer™心脏封堵器/Amplatzer™护身符™装置用于非瓣膜性心房颤动左心耳封堵的比较概况:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2024 Jun 15;15(6):5917-5929. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2024.15061. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Clinical efficacy and safety comparison of Watchman device versus ACP/Amulet device for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A study-level meta-analysis of clinical trials.经皮左心耳封堵术治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中 Watchman 装置与 ACP/Amulet 装置的临床疗效和安全性比较:临床试验的研究水平荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Feb;46(2):117-125. doi: 10.1002/clc.23956. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
3
Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion discrepancy between randomised trials and clinical practice.经皮左心耳封堵术在随机试验与临床实践中的差异。
Open Heart. 2022 Oct;9(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002079.