University of Rochester, NY, USA.
University of Rochester Medical Center, NY, USA.
Hand (N Y). 2022 Nov;17(6):1242-1249. doi: 10.1177/15589447211017220. Epub 2021 May 31.
Traditional measures of evaluating scholarly output do not capture the impact social media can provide in disseminating and promoting research. We sought to better understand the level of online attention that high-quality hand research received.
Scientific manuscripts published from 2017 in (), () (), and were recorded. Manuscript characteristics were determined, including the number of citations. Altmetric Attention Score (AAS), a measure of a manuscript's online attention and impact, was determined, as well as Twitter mentions, Facebook mentions, and news outlet mentions. Spearman rho (ρ) correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between the number of citations and AAS. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to determine which manuscript factors were associated with AAS.
A total of 323 manuscripts were identified. There was a weak positive correlation between the number of citations and AAS; however, this relationship did not exist for each individual journal. Publication in and were associated with lower average manuscript AAS when using as the reference group. Two additional factors were also associated with increased manuscript AAS: (1) being a clinical study focused on a specific upper extremity anatomical location; and (2) increasing number of institutions on a study.
Publication in and were associated with lower manuscript AAS when using as the reference group, suggesting that and have room for improvement in using social media to share their high-quality hand surgery scientific articles.
传统的学术产出评估方法无法捕捉社交媒体在传播和推广研究方面所能提供的影响力。我们试图更好地了解高质量手部研究在网络上受到的关注程度。
记录了 2017 年在《柳叶刀》()、《新英格兰医学杂志》()、《美国医学会杂志》()和《英国医学杂志》()上发表的科学论文。确定了论文的特征,包括引用次数。还确定了 Altmetric 关注度得分(AAS),这是衡量论文在线关注度和影响力的指标,以及 Twitter 提及、Facebook 提及和新闻媒体提及。使用斯皮尔曼 rho(ρ)相关系数评估引用次数与 AAS 之间的关系。进行多变量线性回归分析,以确定与 AAS 相关的论文因素。
共确定了 323 篇论文。引用次数与 AAS 之间存在微弱的正相关关系;然而,这种关系并不是针对每个单独的期刊存在的。与以《英国医学杂志》为参照组相比,在《柳叶刀》和《新英格兰医学杂志》上发表的论文平均 AAS 较低。另外两个因素也与论文 AAS 的增加相关:(1)是一项针对特定上肢解剖部位的临床研究;以及(2)研究机构数量的增加。
与以《英国医学杂志》为参照组相比,在《柳叶刀》和《新英格兰医学杂志》上发表的论文 AAS 较低,这表明这两种期刊在利用社交媒体分享高质量手部外科科学文章方面还有改进的空间。