Suppr超能文献

[急性心肌梗死患者住院期间恶性室性心律失常风险的临床预测模型的开发与验证]

[Development and validation of a clinical predictive model for the risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmia during hospitalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction].

作者信息

Sun Ling, Mao Lipeng, Zou Ailin, Chi Boyu, Chen Xin, Ji Yuan, Jiang Jianguang, Zhou Xuejun, Wang Qingjie

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, the Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou 213000, Jiangsu, China.

Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116000, Liaoning, China. Corresponding author: Wang Qingjie, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Apr;33(4):438-442. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201217-00760.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a clinical prediction model for the risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmia in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during hospitalization, and evaluate the effect of the prediction model.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted. A total of 2 649 patients with AMI admitted to cardiology department of Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from December 2012 to August 2020 were enrolled. The clinical characteristics including gender, age, medical history, discharge diagnosis, vital signs during hospitalization, electrocardiogram characteristics at admission, laboratory examination indexes, interventional treatment, drug usage, malignant ventricular arrhythmias [mainly included sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular flutter or ventricular fibrillation (VF)], and death were recorded. All patients were divided into two groups according to whether VT/VF occurred during their hospitalization. Independent risk factors for VT/VF during hospitalization were evaluated by multivariate Logistic regression analysis, and a clinical prediction model was constructed. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was plotted, and the area under ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the accuracy of the prediction model.

RESULTS

A total of 2 649 eligible patients with AMI were enrolled, of whom 134 (5.06%) developed VT/VF during hospitalization. The in-hospital mortality rate in VT/VF group was significantly higher than that in non-VT/VF group (38.1% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.01). Compared with the non-VT/VF group, the patients in the VT/VF group with lower systolic blood pressure [SBP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 125.9±28.2 vs. 132.0±24.2], higher random blood glucose (mmol/L: 8.6±4.8 vs. 7.4±3.7), worse cardiac function [Killip heart function grade ≥ 3: 36.6% vs. 10.7%, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 0.50: 56.7% vs. 33.6%, frequent premature ventricular contractions: 12.7% vs. 1.2%] and more hypokalemia (46.3% vs. 17.3%), with significant differences (all P < 0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that Killip classification of cardiac function ≥ 3 [odds ratio (OR) = 3.540, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 2.336-5.363], random blood glucose > 11.1 mmol/L (OR = 1.841, 95%CI was 1.171-2.893), LVEF < 0.50 (OR = 0.546, 95%CI was 0.374-0.797), frequent premature ventricular contractions (OR = 12.361, 95%CI was 6.077-25.144), potassium < 3.5 mmol/L (OR = 4.268, 95%CI was 2.910-6.259), SBP < 90 mmHg (OR = 0.299, 95%CI was 0.150-0.597) and creatinine (Cr) > 100 μmol/L (OR = 2.498, 95%CI was 1.170-5.334) were independent risk factors for VT/VF in patients with AMI (all P < 0.05). The clinical prediction model of VT/VF risk was constructed based on the variables selected by multivariate regression analysis. The ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of the model in predicting VT/VF was 0.779 (95%CI was 0.735-0.823, P < 0.001); the optimal cut-off value of the model was 17, the sensitivity was 76.1%, the specificity was 67.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of VT/VF during hospitalization of AMI patients significantly increases the risk of in-hospital death. The independent risk factors of VT/VF are Killip grade ≥ 3, random blood glucose > 11.1 mmol/L, LVEF < 0.50, frequent ventricular premature beats, potassium < 3.5 mmol/L, SBP < 90 mmHg and Cr > 100 μmol/L. The newly constructed clinical prediction model has certain predictive value for the occurrence risk of VT/VF.

摘要

目的

建立并验证急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者住院期间发生恶性室性心律失常风险的临床预测模型,并评估该预测模型的效果。

方法

进行一项回顾性研究。纳入2012年12月至2020年8月在南京医科大学附属常州第二人民医院心内科住院的2649例AMI患者。记录患者的临床特征,包括性别、年龄、病史、出院诊断、住院期间生命体征、入院时心电图特征、实验室检查指标、介入治疗、药物使用情况、恶性室性心律失常[主要包括持续性室性心动过速(VT)、心室扑动或心室颤动(VF)]以及死亡情况。根据患者住院期间是否发生VT/VF将所有患者分为两组。通过多因素Logistic回归分析评估住院期间VT/VF的独立危险因素,并构建临床预测模型。绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线),计算ROC曲线下面积(AUC)以评估预测模型的准确性。

结果

共纳入2649例符合条件的AMI患者,其中134例(5.06%)在住院期间发生VT/VF。VT/VF组的院内死亡率显著高于非VT/VF组(38.1%比1.7%,P<0.01)。与非VT/VF组相比,VT/VF组患者收缩压较低[SBP(mmHg,1mmHg = 0.133kPa):125.9±28.2比132.0±24.2]、随机血糖较高(mmol/L:8.6±4.8比7.4±3.7)、心功能较差[Killip心功能分级≥3级:36.6%比10.7%,左心室射血分数(LVEF)<0.50:56.7%比33.6%,频发室性早搏:12.7%比1.2%]以及低钾血症更多(46.3%比17.3%),差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,心功能Killip分级≥3[比值比(OR) = 3.540,95%置信区间(95%CI)为2.336 - 5.363]、随机血糖>11.1mmol/L(OR = 1.841,95%CI为1.171 - 2.893)、LVEF<0.50(OR = 0.546,95%CI为0.374 - 0.797)、频发室性早搏(OR = 12.361,95%CI为6.077 - 25.144)、血钾<3.5mmol/L(OR = 4.268,95%CI为2.910 - 6.259)、SBP<90mmHg(OR = 0.299,95%CI为0.150 - 0.597)以及肌酐(Cr)>100μmol/L(OR = 2.498,95%CI为1.170 - 5.334)是AMI患者发生VT/VF的独立危险因素(均P<0.05)。基于多因素回归分析筛选出的变量构建VT/VF风险的临床预测模型。ROC曲线分析显示,该模型预测VT/VF的AUC为0.779(95%CI为0.735 - 0.823,P<0.001);模型的最佳截断值为17,灵敏度为76.1%,特异度为67.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验