• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Intraosseous Regional Administration of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术中抗生素预防的骨内区域给药
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2020 Dec 24;10(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00001. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
2
Intraosseous Administration of Medications in Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Opportunity for Improved Outcomes and Superior Compliance.全膝关节置换术中骨内给药:改善疗效和提高依从性的契机
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 May 22;14(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00071. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
3
Cementless, Cruciate-Retaining Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Conventional Instrumentation: Technical Pearls and Intraoperative Considerations.使用传统器械的非骨水泥型、保留交叉韧带初次全膝关节置换术:技术要点与术中注意事项
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 Sep 13;14(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00036. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
4
Intraosseous Regional Administration of Vancomycin Prophylaxis for Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.万古霉素骨内区域给药预防初次及翻修全膝关节置换术
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(3):219-222. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.71420.3337.
5
The John N. Insall Award: Higher Tissue Concentrations of Vancomycin Achieved With Intraosseous Regional Prophylaxis in Revision TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial.约翰·N·英索尔奖:全膝关节置换翻修术中采用骨内区域预防措施可实现更高的万古霉素组织浓度:一项随机对照试验
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):66-74. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000013.
6
The Mark Coventry Award: Higher tissue concentrations of vancomycin with low-dose intraosseous regional versus systemic prophylaxis in TKA: a randomized trial.马克·考文垂奖:在 TKA 中,低剂量骨内区域性与全身性预防相比,万古霉素的组织浓度更高:一项随机试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3038-z.
7
Safety and effectiveness of intraosseous regional prophylactic antibiotics in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.关节置换术中骨内区域性预防性抗生素的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4233-4245. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05513-0. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
8
Regional Intraosseous Administration of Prophylactic Antibiotics is More Effective Than Systemic Administration in a Mouse Model of TKA.在全膝关节置换术小鼠模型中,预防性抗生素的区域骨内给药比全身给药更有效。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3573-84. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4464-x. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
9
The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: Intraosseous Regional Prophylaxis Provides Higher Tissue Concentrations in High BMI Patients in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Trial.AAHKS 临床研究奖:在全膝关节置换术中,骨内区域性预防在高 BMI 患者中提供更高的组织浓度:一项随机试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S13-S18. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
10
Intraosseous Regional Administration of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.全膝关节置换术中抗生素预防性用药的骨内区域给药:一项系统评价
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Apr;38(4):769-774. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.10.023. Epub 2022 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges in Managing Vancomycin Flushing Syndrome Following Vancomycin-Loaded Bone Cement for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Case Report.万古霉素负载骨水泥治疗人工关节感染后管理万古霉素潮红综合征的挑战:一例报告
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(9):674-678. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.79046.3626.
2
Intraosseous Regional Administration of Vancomycin Prophylaxis for Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.万古霉素骨内区域给药预防初次及翻修全膝关节置换术
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(3):219-222. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.71420.3337.
3
The Intraoperative Use of Defensive Antibacterial Coating (DAC) in the Form of a Gel to Prevent Peri-Implant Infections in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Clinical Narrative Review.术中使用凝胶形式的防御性抗菌涂层(DAC)预防骨科手术中种植体周围感染:临床叙述性综述
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jul 28;16(15):5304. doi: 10.3390/ma16155304.
4
Principles of mechanical and chemical debridement with implant retention.保留植入物的机械清创和化学清创原则。
Arthroplasty. 2023 Apr 6;5(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00170-x.
5
Intraosseous Regional Administration of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术中预防性抗生素的骨内区域给药
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 May 9;11(5):634. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050634.

本文引用的文献

1
The John N. Insall Award: Higher Tissue Concentrations of Vancomycin Achieved With Intraosseous Regional Prophylaxis in Revision TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial.约翰·N·英索尔奖:全膝关节置换翻修术中采用骨内区域预防措施可实现更高的万古霉素组织浓度:一项随机对照试验
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):66-74. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000013.
2
Regional Intraosseous Administration of Prophylactic Antibiotics is More Effective Than Systemic Administration in a Mouse Model of TKA.在全膝关节置换术小鼠模型中,预防性抗生素的区域骨内给药比全身给药更有效。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3573-84. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4464-x. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
3
The Mark Coventry Award: Higher tissue concentrations of vancomycin with low-dose intraosseous regional versus systemic prophylaxis in TKA: a randomized trial.马克·考文垂奖:在 TKA 中,低剂量骨内区域性与全身性预防相比,万古霉素的组织浓度更高:一项随机试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3038-z.
4
Impact of vancomycin surgical antibiotic prophylaxis on the development of methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus surgical site infections: report from Australian Surveillance Data (VICNISS).万古霉素手术抗生素预防对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌手术部位感染的影响:来自澳大利亚监测数据(VICNISS)的报告。
Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):1089-92. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825fa398.
5
Higher cefazolin concentrations with intraosseous regional prophylaxis in TKA.关节置换术中骨内区域性预防使用更高浓度头孢唑啉。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan;471(1):244-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2469-2.
6
Intraosseous infusions: a review for the anesthesiologist with a focus on pediatric use.骨内输液:麻醉医师关注的儿科用途综述
Anesth Analg. 2010 Feb 1;110(2):391-401. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c03c7f. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
7
Antibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infections following total hip arthroplasty: timely administration is the most important factor.全髋关节置换术后抗生素预防与手术部位感染风险:及时给药是最重要的因素。
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Apr 1;44(7):921-7. doi: 10.1086/512192. Epub 2007 Feb 14.

全膝关节置换术中抗生素预防的骨内区域给药

Intraosseous Regional Administration of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

作者信息

Arthur Jaymeson R, Bingham Joshua S, Clarke Henry D, Spangehl Mark J, Young Simon W

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2020 Dec 24;10(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00001. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00001
PMID:34055474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8154440/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and perioperative antibiotics are commonly administered to try to mitigate the chance of infection. Intraosseous regional administration (IORA) of prophylactic antibiotics during TKA is a method of antibiotic delivery that has been shown to achieve markedly higher tissue concentrations at much lower doses. Other advantages include ease of administration, ability to time the antibiotic delivery with the surgical start time for maximal effectiveness, and less systemic side effects. The concept is similar to a Bier block, except that IORA involves the use of antibiotics instead of local anesthetic to perfuse the limb and is given via intraosseous rather than intravenous access.

DESCRIPTION

After standard patient preparation and draping, the tourniquet is inflated and an intraosseous needle is inserted into the proximal medial face of the tibia, just medial and slightly above the level of the tubercle. A large syringe containing the desired antibiotic (typically 500 mg vancomycin suspended in normal saline solution) is connected to the needle and the solution is administered over 1 to 2 minutes. The intraosseous needle can then be removed and the surgical procedure proceeds as it normally would per surgeon preference and technique.

ALTERNATIVES

Systemic administration of intravenous antibiotics, vancomycin powder, and antibiotic-impregnated cement are alternative options that can be utilized during TKA.

RATIONALE

IORA has several distinct advantages over other methods of antibiotic delivery, including the ability to (1) deliver antibiotic directly to the surgical bed and avoid systemic delivery, (2) precisely time and quickly administer antibiotics to achieve highest concentrations at the start of and throughout the surgical procedure, and (3) avoid several common and potentially serious side effects, especially those associated with antibiotics such as vancomycin.

EXPECTED OUTCOMES

This technique for antibiotic delivery achieves markedly higher tissue concentrations compared with systemic administration, without prolonged preoperative infusion times. Intraosseous delivery optimizes timing and reduces the risk of systemic side effects while simultaneously providing equal or enhanced antibiotic prophylaxis in TKA. This delivery mechanism is especially useful in patients who are at high risk for infection and in the revision TKA setting. Further, there is little to no additional risk and the use of this method does not substantially prolong operative time.

IMPORTANT TIPS

The proximal aspect of the tibia is the optimal injection site because the cortex is thinner in this region, making needle insertion easier. Additionally, the metaphyseal bone allows faster flow rates for the infusion. We have found that insertions made slightly more proximally are easier and have faster flow rates. Of note, although the antibiotic is infused into the tibia, as seen in the attached technique video, intraosseous administration achieves rapid uptake into the vascular tree. Therefore, all tissues distal to the tourniquet, including the femur and patella, will receive this optimal dose as well.We prefer the use of a power driver (EZ-IO; Teleflex); however, manual needles (Cook Medical) can also be utilized. Longer needles are available if needed for obese patients.Flow rates are variable and the infusion typically takes 1 to 2 minutes to complete. If the flow rate is slow, twisting and withdrawing the needle slightly (2 to 4 mm) may increase the rate. This contrasts with the 1 to 2-hour intravenous infusion time required when vancomycin is administered systemically.In our experience, intraosseous injection is still successful in the case of a previous high tibial osteotomy, although the flow rate may be slower.In complex revision cases with compromised proximal tibial bone, the medial malleolus is an alternative site for intraosseous administration.Choice of antibiotic: as vancomycin is difficult to adequately administer intravenously, it is ideally suited for IORA. We have studied and utilized a 500-mg dose of vancomycin suspended in a solution of 140 mL of normal saline solution (prepared by our pharmacy). Of note, we have not found rapid infusion of intraosseous vancomycin to cause red-man syndrome as it would with rapid systemic infusion. This is because of the lower dose of 500 mg and the use of the tourniquet, which keeps the antibiotic in the local tissues about the knee without allowing systemic exposure. All patients, regardless of weight or the size of their limb, receive the dose of 500 mg of vancomycin.As cefazolin does not have the same difficulties with intravenous administration, we continue to use standard intravenous prophylaxis with an appropriate weight-based dose of cefazolin prior to incision.Indications for IORA of vancomycin include clinical scenarios in which vancomycin would be administered intravenously. These indications include revision TKA, obesity (body mass index >40 kg/m), diabetes, beta-lactam allergy, known colonization with methicillin-resistant (MRSA) patients coming from institutions with a high prevalence of MRSA previous ligamentous surgical procedure or osteotomies, and current or recent smokers. IORA can be utilized even in the primary TKA setting if the patient is considered high-risk as defined by the criteria above. We also use IORA during reimplantation following 2-stage exchange for PJI and in patients undergoing irrigation and debridement for acute PJI when the organism has been identified preoperatively.

摘要

背景

人工关节周围感染(PJI)是全膝关节置换术(TKA)后一种严重的并发症,围手术期通常使用抗生素以降低感染几率。TKA术中骨内区域给药(IORA)是一种抗生素给药方法,已证明其能以低得多的剂量实现显著更高的组织浓度。其他优点包括给药方便、能够根据手术开始时间精确给药以达到最大效果以及全身副作用较少。该概念与 Bier 阻滞类似,不同之处在于 IORA 使用抗生素而非局部麻醉剂灌注肢体,且通过骨内而非静脉途径给药。

描述

在患者进行标准准备和铺巾后,充气止血带,将骨内针插入胫骨近端内侧,恰好在结节水平内侧且略上方。将装有所需抗生素(通常为 500mg 万古霉素溶于生理盐水)的大注射器连接到针上,在 1 至 2 分钟内注入溶液。然后可拔出骨内针,手术按外科医生的偏好和技术正常进行。

替代方法

静脉全身使用抗生素、万古霉素粉末和抗生素骨水泥是 TKA 期间可采用的替代选择。

原理

IORA 相对于其他抗生素给药方法有几个明显优点,包括能够(1)将抗生素直接输送到手术部位并避免全身给药;(2)精确计时并快速给药,在手术开始时及整个手术过程中达到最高浓度;(3)避免几种常见且可能严重的副作用,尤其是与万古霉素等抗生素相关的副作用。

预期结果

与全身给药相比,这种抗生素给药技术能实现显著更高的组织浓度,且无需延长术前输注时间。骨内给药优化了给药时间并降低了全身副作用风险,同时在 TKA 中提供同等或更强的抗生素预防效果。这种给药机制在感染高危患者和翻修 TKA 情况下尤其有用。此外,几乎没有额外风险,使用该方法也不会显著延长手术时间。

重要提示

胫骨近端是最佳注射部位,因为该区域皮质较薄,使针插入更容易。此外,干骺端骨允许更快的输注流速。我们发现稍向近端插入更容易且流速更快。值得注意的是,尽管抗生素注入胫骨,但如随附技术视频所示,骨内给药能使药物迅速被血管吸收。因此,止血带远端的所有组织,包括股骨和髌骨,也将接受这一最佳剂量。我们更喜欢使用动力驱动器(EZ - IO;泰利福);不过,也可使用手动针(库克医疗)。肥胖患者如有需要可使用更长的针。流速可变,输注通常需 1 至 2 分钟完成。如果流速缓慢,稍微扭转并拔出针(2 至 4mm)可能会提高流速。这与全身使用万古霉素时所需的 1 至 2 小时静脉输注时间形成对比。根据我们的经验,既往有高位胫骨截骨术时骨内注射仍可成功,尽管流速可能较慢。在胫骨近端骨受损的复杂翻修病例中,内踝是骨内给药的替代部位。

抗生素选择

由于万古霉素难以通过静脉充分给药,它非常适合 IORA。我们研究并使用了 500mg 万古霉素溶于 140mL 生理盐水溶液(由我们的药房配制)的剂量。值得注意的是,我们未发现骨内快速输注万古霉素会像全身快速输注那样引起红人综合征。这是因为剂量为 500mg 较低,且使用了止血带将抗生素保留在膝关节周围的局部组织中而不发生全身暴露。所有患者,无论体重或肢体大小,均接受 500mg 万古霉素剂量。由于头孢唑林在静脉给药方面没有同样的困难,我们在切开前继续使用基于适当体重的标准静脉预防性头孢唑林剂量。万古霉素 IORA 的适应证包括临床情况中原本会静脉使用万古霉素的情况。这些适应证包括翻修 TKA、肥胖(体重指数>4kg/m²)、糖尿病、β - 内酰胺过敏、已知有耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)定植、来自 MRSA 患病率高的机构的患者、既往有韧带手术或截骨术以及当前或近期吸烟者。如果患者符合上述标准被认为具有高风险,即使在初次 TKA 情况下也可使用 IORA。我们还在 PJI 两阶段置换后的再植入过程中以及术前已鉴定出病原体的急性 PJI 患者进行冲洗和清创时使用 IORA 使用 IORA。