Davies Thomas W, Alemseged Zeresenay, Gidna Agness, Hublin Jean-Jacques, Kimbel William H, Kullmer Ottmar, Spoor Fred, Zanolli Clément, Skinner Matthew M
Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
PeerJ. 2021 May 20;9:e11415. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11415. eCollection 2021.
Studies of hominin dental morphology frequently consider accessory cusps on the lower molars, in particular those on the distal margin of the tooth (C6 or distal accessory cusp) and the lingual margin of the tooth (C7 or lingual accessory cusp). They are often utilized in studies of hominin systematics, where their presence or absence is assessed at the outer enamel surface (OES). However, studies of the enamel-dentine junction (EDJ) suggest these traits may be more variable in development, morphology and position than previously thought. Building on these studies, we outline a scoring procedure for the EDJ expression of these accessory cusps that considers the relationship between these accessory cusps and the surrounding primary cusps. We apply this scoring system to a sample of Plio-Pleistocene hominin mandibular molars of sp., and from Africa and Asia ( = 132). We find that there are taxon-specific patterns in accessory cusp expression at the EDJ that are consistent with previous findings at the OES. For example, Ms and Ms very often have a distal accessory cusp but no lingual accessory cusp, while Ms and Ms show the opposite pattern. The EDJ also reveals a number of complicating factors; some apparent accessory cusps at the enamel surface are represented at the EDJ only by shouldering on the ridges associated with the main cusps, while other accessory cusps appear to have little or no EDJ expression at all. We also discuss the presence of double and triple accessory cusps, including the presence of a double lingual accessory cusp on the distal ridge of the metaconid in the type specimen of (OH 7-M) that is not clear at the OES due to occlusal wear. Overall, our observations, as well as our understanding of the developmental underpinnings of cusp patterning, suggest that we should be cautious in our comparisons of accessory cusps for taxonomic interpretations.
对古人类牙齿形态的研究经常关注下颌磨牙上的副尖,尤其是位于牙齿远中边缘的副尖(C6或远中副尖)和牙齿舌侧边缘的副尖(C7或舌侧副尖)。它们经常被用于古人类系统学研究,在这些研究中,会在牙釉质外表面(OES)评估它们的有无。然而,对釉质-牙本质界(EDJ)的研究表明,这些特征在发育、形态和位置上的变化可能比之前认为的更大。基于这些研究,我们概述了一种对这些副尖在EDJ处的表达进行评分的程序,该程序考虑了这些副尖与周围主要牙尖之间的关系。我们将这个评分系统应用于来自非洲和亚洲的上新世-更新世古人类下颌磨牙样本,样本包括 种、 种和 种( = 132)。我们发现在EDJ处副尖表达存在特定分类群模式,这与之前在OES处的发现一致。例如, 种和 种的下颌磨牙通常有远中副尖但没有舌侧副尖,而 种和 种则呈现相反的模式。EDJ还揭示了一些复杂因素;牙釉质表面一些明显的副尖在EDJ处仅表现为与主要牙尖相关的嵴上的肩部,而其他副尖在EDJ处似乎几乎没有或根本没有表达。我们还讨论了双副尖和三副尖的存在,包括在 种(OH 7-M)的模式标本中,在远中尖嵴上存在双舌侧副尖,由于咬合磨损,在OES处并不明显。总体而言,我们的观察结果以及我们对牙尖模式发育基础的理解表明,在为分类学解释而比较副尖时我们应该谨慎。