Guo Qi, Li Hongwei, Ouyang Huijun, Sun Runlu, Wang Junjie, Wu Maoxiong, Pan Yue, Wang Jingfeng, Zhang Yuling
Department of Cardiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 May 14;8:577742. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.577742. eCollection 2021.
Whether heart rate (HR) fluctuation after admission has an impact on the outcomes of critically ill myocardial infarction (MI) patients in intensive care unit remains unknown. A total of 2,031 MI patients were enrolled from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) database. HR fluctuation was calculated as the maximum HR minus the minimum HR in the initial 24 h after admission. Participants were divided into 3 groups, namely, low HR fluctuation [<30 beats per minute (bpm)], medium HR fluctuation (30-49 bpm), and high HR fluctuation (≥ 50 bpm). The main outcomes were 30-day and 1-year mortality. Cox regression and restricted cubic spline model were used. Each 10-bpm increase in HR fluctuation was associated with a higher risk of 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality, with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.122 (95% CI, 1.083-1.162) and 1.107 (95% CI, 1.074-1.140), respectively. Compared with the low HR fluctuation group, the high HR fluctuation group suffered a significantly higher risk of mortality after adjustment, with hazard ratios of 2.156 (95% CI, 1.483-3.134) for 30-day mortality and 1.796 (95% CI, 1.354-2.381) for 1-year mortality. A typical J-type curve was observed in restricted cubic splines for the association between HR fluctuation and 30-day or 1-year mortality of MI patients, with the lowest risk on the HR fluctuation of 30 bpm. Sensitivity analyses emphasized the robustness of our results. This retrospective cohort study revealed an independent positive association between HR fluctuation and 30-day and 1-year mortality in critically ill MI patients, which warrants further investigation.
入院后心率(HR)波动是否会对重症监护病房中危重症心肌梗死(MI)患者的预后产生影响尚不清楚。我们从重症监护医学信息数据库(MIMIC-III)中纳入了2031例MI患者。HR波动通过入院后最初24小时内的最高心率减去最低心率来计算。参与者被分为3组,即低HR波动[<30次/分钟(bpm)]、中等HR波动(30-49 bpm)和高HR波动(≥50 bpm)。主要结局为30天和1年死亡率。采用Cox回归和受限立方样条模型。HR波动每增加10 bpm,30天死亡率和1年死亡率的风险就更高,调整后的风险比分别为1.122(95%CI,1.083-1.162)和1.107(95%CI,1.074-1.140)。与低HR波动组相比,高HR波动组在调整后死亡率风险显著更高,30天死亡率的风险比为2.156(95%CI,1.483-3.134),1年死亡率的风险比为1.796(95%CI,1.354-2.381)。在MI患者HR波动与30天或1年死亡率之间的关联的受限立方样条中观察到典型的J型曲线,HR波动为30 bpm时风险最低。敏感性分析强调了我们结果的稳健性。这项回顾性队列研究揭示了危重症MI患者HR波动与30天和1年死亡率之间存在独立的正相关,这值得进一步研究。