Leventhal G
Psychology Department, William Paterson College, Wayne, New Jersey 07470.
Percept Mot Skills. 1988 Jun;66(3):791-800. doi: 10.2466/pms.1988.66.3.791.
This study investigated the role of cerebral dominance, functional localization, and attentional bias on the recognition of neutral and emotionally charged words presented unilaterally and bilaterally by a tachistoscope to the left and right visual fields of 42 left and 42 right handers. The major findings were: (1) Over-all, right handers perceived more words than left handers; (2) Although more neutral words were perceived, there were no interactive effects for type of word; (3) Unilateral presentation: LVF = RVF for left and right handers; Bilateral presentation: left handers evidenced a left visual-field advantage, right handers evidenced a right visual-field advantage; (4) Directional cuing did not magnify the existing visual field advantage but increased efficiency of recognition for words presented to the correctly cued nondominant visual field and decreased efficiency of recognition for words presented to the incorrectly cued dominant visual field. It was concluded that, although each hemisphere was equally capable of processing single words, cerebral dominance and functional localization interact with attentional bias to produce the observed differential in word recognition of the left and right visual fields.
本研究调查了大脑优势、功能定位和注意偏向在42名右利手和42名左利手对通过速示器单侧和双侧呈现于左、右视野的中性词和情绪化词语的识别中的作用。主要研究结果如下:(1)总体而言,右利手比左利手识别出更多的词语;(2)尽管识别出的中性词更多,但词语类型不存在交互效应;(3)单侧呈现:左利手和右利手的左视野=右视野;双侧呈现:左利手表现出左视野优势,右利手表现出右视野优势;(4)定向提示并未放大现有的视野优势,但提高了呈现于正确提示的非优势视野的词语的识别效率,降低了呈现于错误提示的优势视野的词语的识别效率。研究得出结论,尽管每个半球都同样有能力处理单个词语,但大脑优势和功能定位与注意偏向相互作用,从而在左、右视野的词语识别中产生了观察到的差异。