• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

什么因素预测了感知到的经济不平等?实际不平等、制度辩护和公平考量的作用。

What predicts perceived economic inequality? The roles of actual inequality, system justification, and fairness considerations.

机构信息

Institute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai, China.

Faculty of Education, University of Macau, China.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jan;61(1):19-36. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12468. Epub 2021 May 31.

DOI:10.1111/bjso.12468
PMID:34057748
Abstract

Past studies have mostly focused on investigating actual economic inequality with less work devoted to understanding perceived economic inequality and its antecedents. However, numerous studies have shown that perceived inequality is a strong predictor of psychological, political, and social outcomes and hence is an important outcome in and of itself. This paper aims to identify the socioecological (i.e., actual inequality) and psychological (legitimation and fairness considerations) antecedents of perceived economic inequality. We hypothesized that individuals who legitimized income inequality would perceive less inequality, whereas individuals who experienced unfairness engendered by income inequality would perceive more inequality. We utilized a nationally representative sample in China (N = 33,600 respondents nested within 25 provinces) and conducted multilevel longitudinal analyses to test our hypotheses. In line with our predictions, we found that legitimation of inequality was associated with less perceived inequality six years later, whereas unfairness was associated with more perceived inequality six years later. In addition, we found that in more unequal areas, people perceived less income inequality. These longitudinal effects were robust when controlling for prior years of perceived inequality, economic development, and sociodemographic factors. Findings have implications for system justification and economic inequality theories.

摘要

过去的研究大多集中于调查实际经济不平等,而较少关注理解感知经济不平等及其前因。然而,许多研究表明,感知到的不平等是心理、政治和社会结果的强有力预测因素,因此本身就是一个重要的结果。本文旨在确定感知经济不平等的社会生态(即实际不平等)和心理(合法化和公平考虑)前因。我们假设,将收入不平等合法化的人会认为不平等程度较低,而经历由收入不平等引起的不公正的人则会认为不平等程度较高。我们利用中国一个具有全国代表性的样本(33600 名受访者嵌套在 25 个省份中)进行了多层次纵向分析,以检验我们的假设。与我们的预测一致,我们发现,不平等合法化与六年后感知到的不平等程度较低有关,而不公正则与六年后感知到的不平等程度较高有关。此外,我们发现,在不平等程度较高的地区,人们对收入不平等的感知程度较低。这些纵向效应在控制了前几年的感知不平等、经济发展和社会人口因素后仍然稳健。研究结果对制度合理化和经济不平等理论具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
What predicts perceived economic inequality? The roles of actual inequality, system justification, and fairness considerations.什么因素预测了感知到的经济不平等?实际不平等、制度辩护和公平考量的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jan;61(1):19-36. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12468. Epub 2021 May 31.
2
How Fair is Economic Inequality? Belief in a Just World and the Legitimation of Economic Disparities in 27 European Countries.经济不平等有多公平?27个欧洲国家对公正世界的信念与经济差距的合法化
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Mar;48(3):382-395. doi: 10.1177/01461672211002366. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
3
Income inequality and happiness.收入不平等与幸福感
Psychol Sci. 2011 Sep;22(9):1095-100. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417262. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
4
Economic and social distance: Perceived income inequality negatively predicts an interdependent self-construal.经济和社会距离:感知到的收入不平等对相互依存的自我建构有负面预测作用。
Int J Psychol. 2019 Feb;54(1):117-125. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12437. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
5
The psychological imprint of inequality: Economic inequality shapes achievement and power values in human life.不平等的心理印记:经济不平等塑造了人类生活中的成就和权力价值观。
J Pers. 2024 Feb;92(1):222-242. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12758. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
6
Income inequality is detrimental to long-term well-being: A large-scale longitudinal investigation in China.收入不平等对长期幸福感有害:来自中国的一项大规模纵向调查。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul;232:120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.043. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
7
Income inequality, distributive fairness and political trust in Latin America.拉丁美洲的收入不平等、分配公平与政治信任。
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Jul;52:179-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
8
The paradox of local inequality: Meritocratic beliefs in unequal localities.地方不平等悖论:不平等地方的精英主义信仰。
Br J Sociol. 2022 Mar;73(2):421-460. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12930. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
9
Absolute Income, Income Inequality and the Subjective Well-Being of Migrant Workers in China: Toward an Understanding of the Relationship and Its Psychological Mechanisms.绝对收入、收入不均与中国农民工的主观幸福感:对关系及其心理机制的理解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 21;16(14):2597. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142597.
10
Is it unfair for the affluent to be able to purchase "better" healthcare? Existential standards and institutional norms in healthcare attitudes across 28 countries.富裕人群能够购买到“更好”的医疗保健服务是否公平?28 个国家的医疗保健态度中的存在标准和制度规范。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Dec;267:113146. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113146. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Increasing Subjective Economic Inequality on Prosocial Behavior Development: The Longitudinal Mediating Effect of Trust and Moderating Effect of Socioeconomic Status.主观经济不平等加剧对亲社会行为发展的影响:信任的纵向中介作用和社会经济地位的调节作用
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02166-z.
2
Identifying the spatial heterogeneity of housing financialization in China: Insights from a multiscale geographically weighted regression.识别中国住房金融化的空间异质性:来自多尺度地理加权回归的见解
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 12;10(6):e27542. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27542. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
3
Economic inequality increases the number of hours worked and decreases work-life balance perceptions: longitudinal and experimental evidence.
经济不平等增加工作时长并降低工作与生活平衡感:纵向研究与实验证据
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Oct 18;10(10):230187. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230187. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
The role of system justification theory in support of the government under long-term conservative party dominance in Japan.系统正当化理论在长期由保守党主导的日本对政府的支持中所起的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 29;14:909022. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.909022. eCollection 2023.
5
Justice Evaluation of the Income Distribution (JEID): Development and validation of a short scale for the subjective assessment of objective differences in earnings.收入分配公正评价量表(JEID):用于主观评估收入客观差异的简短量表的编制与验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0281021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281021. eCollection 2023.
6
Variation in Public Trust, Perceived Societal Fairness, and Well-Being before and after COVID-19 Onset-Evidence from the China Family Panel Studies.新冠疫情前后公众信任、社会公平感和幸福感的变化——来自中国家庭追踪调查的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 28;19(19):12365. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912365.
7
Tax the élites! The role of economic inequality and conspiracy beliefs on attitudes towards taxes and redistribution intentions.向精英征税!经济不平等和阴谋信念对税收态度和再分配意愿的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62(1):104-118. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12555. Epub 2022 Jun 27.