• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型 gem premier chemstat 在血液透析患者中直接测量碳酸氢盐的分析评估。

Analytical evaluation of direct bicarbonate measurement with the new gem premier chemstat in hemodialysis patients.

机构信息

Laboratory Service Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza IFCA, Firenze, Italy.

SOD Sicurezza e Qualità Careggi Hospital, Firenze, Italy.

出版信息

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2021 Sep;81(5):418-421. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2021.1930142. Epub 2021 May 31.

DOI:10.1080/00365513.2021.1930142
PMID:34057879
Abstract

GEM Premier ChemSTAT is a whole-blood analyzer designed for providing a rapid basic metabolic panel, inclusive of creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, with the unique characteristic of providing measured bicarbonate (HCO) levels. The aim of this work was to evaluate the clinical performance of HCO assessment with this analyser in a real-life hemodialysis setting. Imprecision was calculated at different HCO levels, along with assay comparison with Gem Premier 4000 analysers. GEM Premier ChemSTAT displayed an imprecision and a bias (in comparison to GEM Premier 4000) for HCO of 0.4% and 37.3% at 20.8 mmol/L, 1.2% and 25.6% at 16.4 mmol/L, and 2.1% and 11.6% at 11.5 mmol/L, respectively, using three levels of HCO quality control sample ChemSTAT System Evaluator. At direct comparison with the GEM Premier 4000 in the hemodialysis setting, Bland-Altman analysis of HCO levels evidenced a bias () of -4.9 (95% CI, -5.2 to -4.7) mmol/L. Such difference was attenuated by recalculating the GEM ChemSTAT expected HCO values from pH and pCO using the Henderson Hasselbach equation, =-0.07 (95%CI, -0.19 to 0.05) mmol/L ( = .24). In conclusion, our results show a remarkable difference between the HCO values reported by GEM ChemSTAT or GEM 4000. New reference values for GEM ChemSTAT HCO shall hence be defined according to our findings. We suggest that further investigation and a re-evaluation of the reference range should be made before extending the clinical use of this device.

摘要

GEM Premier ChemSTAT 是一款全血分析仪,旨在提供快速的基本代谢面板,包括肌酐和血尿素氮,并具有提供测量碳酸氢盐 (HCO) 水平的独特特点。本研究旨在评估该分析仪在实际血液透析环境中评估 HCO 的临床性能。在不同 HCO 水平下计算精密度,并与 Gem Premier 4000 分析仪进行测定比较。GEM Premier ChemSTAT 在 20.8mmol/L 时显示 HCO 的精密度和偏差(与 Gem Premier 4000 相比)分别为 0.4%和 37.3%,在 16.4mmol/L 时分别为 1.2%和 25.6%,在 11.5mmol/L 时分别为 2.1%和 11.6%,使用三个水平的 HCO 质量控制样本 ChemSTAT 系统评估器。在直接与血液透析环境中的 GEM Premier 4000 进行比较时,HCO 水平的 Bland-Altman 分析显示偏倚 () 为-4.9(95%CI,-5.2 至-4.7)mmol/L。通过使用 Henderson Hasselbach 方程从 pH 和 pCO 重新计算 GEM ChemSTAT 预期的 HCO 值,可以减轻这种差异,= -0.07(95%CI,-0.19 至 0.05)mmol/L( = 0.24)。总之,我们的结果显示 GEM ChemSTAT 或 GEM 4000 报告的 HCO 值之间存在显著差异。根据我们的发现,应定义新的 GEM ChemSTAT HCO 参考值。我们建议在扩展该设备的临床应用之前,应进行进一步的研究和重新评估参考范围。

相似文献

1
Analytical evaluation of direct bicarbonate measurement with the new gem premier chemstat in hemodialysis patients.新型 gem premier chemstat 在血液透析患者中直接测量碳酸氢盐的分析评估。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2021 Sep;81(5):418-421. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2021.1930142. Epub 2021 May 31.
2
Performance evaluation of a point of care cartridge of the new GEM Premier ChemSTAT analyzer.新型GEM Premier ChemSTAT分析仪即时检测试剂盒的性能评估
Pract Lab Med. 2022 Jul 19;31:e00297. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2022.e00297. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Reliability of point-of-care hematocrit, blood gas, electrolyte, lactate and glucose measurement during cardiopulmonary bypass.体外循环期间即时检测血细胞比容、血气、电解质、乳酸和葡萄糖的可靠性。
Perfusion. 2006 Jan;21(1):33-7. doi: 10.1191/0267659106pf846oa.
4
Clinical Evaluation of a New Point-of-Care System for Chemistry Panel Testing.一种用于化学全项检测的新型即时检验系统的临床评估
J Appl Lab Med. 2019 Sep;4(2):180-192. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2019.029900. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
5
Comparing measured total carbon dioxide and calculated bicarbonate.比较测量的总二氧化碳和计算的碳酸氢盐。
Malays J Pathol. 2010 Jun;32(1):21-6.
6
Comparison of Creatinine, Urea, Ionized Calcium, and Bicarbonate Methods by 2 POC Systems and a Mainframe Chemistry Analyzer.两种即时检测系统与主机化学分析仪对肌酐、尿素、离子钙和碳酸氢盐方法的比较。
J Appl Lab Med. 2023 Mar 6;8(2):296-306. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfac099.
7
A comparison of bicarbonate kinetics and acid-base status in high flux hemodialysis and on-line post-dilution hemodiafiltration.高通量血液透析与在线后稀释血液透析滤过中碳酸氢盐动力学和酸碱状态的比较。
Int J Artif Organs. 2012 Apr 30;35(4):288-300. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000082. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
8
Daily variability of acid-base status and determinants of serum bicarbonate in hemodialysis patients.血液透析患者酸碱状态的日变异性及碳酸氢盐的决定因素。
Clin Nephrol. 2022 Jul;98(1):26-32. doi: 10.5414/CN110735.
9
[Bicarbonate versus acetate hemodialysis: effects on the acid-base status].[碳酸氢盐与醋酸盐血液透析:对酸碱平衡状态的影响]
Med Arh. 2001;55(4):231-3.
10
Correction of metabolic acidosis and its effect on albumin in chronic hemodialysis patients.慢性血液透析患者代谢性酸中毒的纠正及其对白蛋白的影响。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Jan;31(1):35-40. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v31.pm9428449.