Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Nov;43(11):1274-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 May 28.
To evaluate the diagnostic value of the "sliding sign", a sonographic test, in predicting intra-abdominal adhesions for women undergoing repeat cesarean delivery.
This was a prospective observational study of women undergoing a scheduled repeat cesarean delivery at a regional hospital. The sliding sign is a sonographic observation of sliding movement between the uterus and the abdominal wall during deep breathing. The absence of the sliding sign was considered indicative of a high risk for dense uterine-abdominal adhesions, and this finding was compared with the operative findings. The primary outcome was the accuracy of the sliding sign in predicting adhesions. Secondary outcomes included incision-to-delivery time, operative time, and blood loss.
We examined 112 pregnant women. Dense uterine-abdominal adhesions were found in 15 women, 8 of whom had no sliding sign identified on ultrasound. Therefore, the presence of the sliding sign detected 78 out of 97 women without uterine-abdominal adhesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the sliding sign were 53.3%, 80.4%, 29.6%, and 91.8%, respectively. The intra- and inter-observer reliability using the kappa coefficient showed moderate consistency at 0.43 and 0.45, respectively.
The sliding sign was less predictive than desired for clinical use, and it only detected half of the women with dense uterine-abdominal adhesions. Furthermore, a moderately low kappa coefficient indicates a lack of reproducibility, further emphasizing the sign's limited clinical value.
评估“滑动征”(一种超声检查测试)在预测行重复剖宫产术的女性发生腹腔内粘连方面的诊断价值。
这是一项在区域医院行计划性重复剖宫产术的女性的前瞻性观察性研究。滑动征是一种超声观察,即在深吸气时观察子宫与腹壁之间的滑动运动。如果滑动征不存在,则认为子宫腹壁粘连致密的风险较高,并且将此发现与手术结果进行比较。主要结局是滑动征预测粘连的准确性。次要结局包括切口至分娩时间、手术时间和失血量。
我们检查了 112 名孕妇。15 名孕妇发现有致密的子宫-腹壁粘连,其中 8 名孕妇在超声检查中未发现滑动征。因此,滑动征在 97 名无子宫-腹壁粘连的女性中检测到 78 名。滑动征的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 53.3%、80.4%、29.6%和 91.8%。使用 Kappa 系数的观察者内和观察者间可靠性分别为中度一致性,分别为 0.43 和 0.45。
滑动征的预测性不如预期,仅能检测到一半的致密性子宫-腹壁粘连女性。此外,较低的 Kappa 系数表明缺乏可重复性,进一步强调了该征象的临床价值有限。