• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

很高兴能提供帮助——如果不是太悲伤的话:情绪对帮助可识别和不可识别的受害者的影响。

Happy to help-if it's not too sad: The effect of mood on helping identifiable and unidentifiable victims.

机构信息

School of Education, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Department of Education, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 1;16(6):e0252278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252278. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0252278
PMID:34061880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8168869/
Abstract

People's preference to help single victims about whom they have some information is known as the identifiable victim effect. Previous research suggests that this effect stems from an intensive emotional reaction toward specific victims. The findings of two studies consistently show that the identifiability effect is attenuated when the subject is in a positive mood. Study 1 (along with a pilot study) demonstrate causal relationships between mood and identifiability, while using different manipulations to induce moods. In both studies, donations to identified victims exceeded donations to unidentified people-in the Negative Mood manipulations-while participants in the Positive Mood conditions showed no such preference. In Study 2, individual differences in people's moods interacted with the recipient's identifiability in predicting donations, demonstrating that the identifiability effect is attenuated by a positive mood. In addition, emotional reactions toward the victims replicate the donation pattern, suggesting emotions as a possible explanation for the observed donation pattern.

摘要

人们更愿意帮助自己有所了解的单一受害者,这种现象被称为可识别受害者效应。先前的研究表明,这种效应源于对特定受害者的强烈情绪反应。两项研究的结果一致表明,当主体处于积极情绪时,可识别性效应会减弱。研究 1(以及一项试点研究)通过使用不同的操作来诱导情绪,证明了情绪和可识别性之间的因果关系。在这两项研究中,在消极情绪操作中,对已识别受害者的捐款超过了对未识别者的捐款,而在积极情绪条件下的参与者则没有表现出这种偏好。在研究 2 中,人们情绪的个体差异与受助者的可识别性相互作用,预测了捐款,表明积极情绪会减弱可识别性效应。此外,对受害者的情绪反应复制了捐款模式,表明情绪可能是观察到的捐款模式的一个解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4758/8168869/0130c1e8a11f/pone.0252278.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4758/8168869/fcaba8b4dfee/pone.0252278.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4758/8168869/0130c1e8a11f/pone.0252278.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4758/8168869/fcaba8b4dfee/pone.0252278.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4758/8168869/0130c1e8a11f/pone.0252278.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Happy to help-if it's not too sad: The effect of mood on helping identifiable and unidentifiable victims.很高兴能提供帮助——如果不是太悲伤的话:情绪对帮助可识别和不可识别的受害者的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 1;16(6):e0252278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252278. eCollection 2021.
2
Altruistic behavior in cohesive social groups: The role of target identifiability.在具有凝聚力的社会群体中的利他行为:目标可识别性的作用。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 21;12(11):e0187903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187903. eCollection 2017.
3
Victim identifiability, number of victims, and unit asking in charitable giving.受害者识别、受害者人数和慈善捐赠中请求的单位。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0300863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300863. eCollection 2024.
4
Mental Imagery, Impact, and Affect: A Mediation Model for Charitable Giving.心理意象、影响与情感:慈善捐赠的中介模型
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e0148274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148274. eCollection 2016.
5
Neurocomputational Substrates Underlying the Effect of Identifiability on Third-Party Punishment.可识别性对第三方惩罚影响的神经计算基础。
J Neurosci. 2023 Nov 22;43(47):8018-8031. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0460-23.2023.
6
Social media's influence on momentary emotion based on people's initial mood: an experimental design.社交媒体对基于人们初始情绪的瞬间情绪的影响:一项实验设计。
Cogn Emot. 2023 Aug-Sep;37(5):1049-1056. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2023.2219443. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
7
The influence of induced mood on music preference.诱导情绪对音乐偏好的影响。
Cogn Process. 2018 Nov;19(4):517-525. doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0872-7. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
8
Neural underpinnings of the identifiable victim effect: affect shifts preferences for giving.可识别受害者效应的神经基础:情感转变影响捐赠偏好。
J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 23;33(43):17188-96. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2348-13.2013.
9
Overcoming beneficiary race as an impediment to charitable donations: social dominance orientation, the experience of moral elevation, and donation behavior.克服受益对象的种族因素对慈善捐赠的阻碍:社会支配取向、道德升华体验与捐赠行为。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan;35(1):72-84. doi: 10.1177/0146167208325415. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
10
Happily putting the pieces together: a test of two explanations for the effects of mood on group-level information processing.愉快地拼凑碎片:对情绪对群体层面信息处理影响的两种解释的检验。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2008 Jun;47(Pt 2):285-309. doi: 10.1348/000712607X218295. Epub 2007 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between charitable giving and emotional facial expressions: Results from affective computing.慈善捐赠与面部情感表达之间的关系:情感计算的结果。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 15;10(2):e23728. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23728. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The manipulation of affect: A meta-analysis of affect induction procedures.情感操控:情感诱导程序的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2020 Apr;146(4):355-375. doi: 10.1037/bul0000224. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
2
Fairness, fast and slow: A review of dual process models of fairness.公平,快与慢:双过程模型视角下的公平综述
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Jun;89:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
3
Cooperation, Fast and Slow: Meta-Analytic Evidence for a Theory of Social Heuristics and Self-Interested Deliberation.
合作、快与慢:社会启发式和自利深思的理论的元分析证据。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Sep;27(9):1192-206. doi: 10.1177/0956797616654455. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
4
Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men.社会启发法与社会角色:直觉促使女性利他,但对男性却并非如此。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Apr;145(4):389-96. doi: 10.1037/xge0000154. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
5
Scope insensitivity in helping decisions: Is it a matter of culture and values?帮助决策中的范围不敏感:这是文化和价值观的问题吗?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Dec;144(6):1042-52. doi: 10.1037/a0039708. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
6
Neural underpinnings of the identifiable victim effect: affect shifts preferences for giving.可识别受害者效应的神经基础:情感转变影响捐赠偏好。
J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 23;33(43):17188-96. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2348-13.2013.
7
Unit asking: a method to boost donations and beyond.单位询问:一种提高捐赠数量的方法及其他。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1801-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797613482947. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
8
Sinning saints and saintly sinners: the paradox of moral self-regulation.罪恶的圣徒与圣洁的罪人:道德自我调节的悖论
Psychol Sci. 2009 Apr;20(4):523-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
9
Incidental sadness biases social economic decisions in the Ultimatum Game.偶发性悲伤会影响最后通牒博弈中的社会经济决策。
Emotion. 2007 Nov;7(4):876-81. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.876.
10
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.