Suppr超能文献

拉丁美洲的姑息治疗:我们有进展吗?使用宏观指标评估随时间的发展情况。

Palliative Care in Latin America: Are We Making Any Progress? Assessing Development Over Time Using Macro Indicators.

作者信息

Pastrana Tania, De Lima Liliana

机构信息

Department of Palliative Medicine, RWTH University Aachen (T.P.), Aachen, Germany.

International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care (IAHPC) (L.D.L.), Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 May 29. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.05.021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Monitoring and reporting palliative care development serves to identify progress as well as remaining challenges for improvement.

AIM

To report on the updated status of palliative care development in Latin America, develop and apply a new index to measure progress, and enable cross-country comparisons.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of the data collected for the 1st (2012) and 2nd (2020) editions of the Atlas of Palliative Care in Latin America using indicators on Policy, Education, Access to Medicines and Service Provision. The ALCP indicators were reviewed and the ALCP Index-II was constructed adding the z-score for each indicator and used to rank the countries' development as High, Moderate or Low.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen Latin American countries.

RESULTS

The number of countries with a national palliative care plan increased from five (29%) to nine (53%); Percentage of medical schools with palliative care as an independent subject at the undergraduate level grew from 4.2% to 17.1%; Distributed Opioid Morphine Equivalence increased from 6.6 to 7.1 mg/capita; and Number of services increased from 1.5 to 2.6/million. The number of palliative care services was correlated to the proportion of medical schools which included palliative care (Rs = 0.48; Rs = 0.34); and with morphine equivalence/capita (Rs = 0.61; Rs = 0.72), but not associated with the existence of a national plan (p = 0.234; p = 0. 074). Using the ALCP Index-II, Uruguay, Chile, Costa Rica, Panama, Brazil, and Argentina ranked the highest while the other ranked in the middle or lowest groups. Uruguay registered the highest score (7.5), Honduras the lowest (-3.59). The dispersal in the values was larger than the one registered in 2012, showing more heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Significant advances in palliative care development in Latin America have been achieved. The ALCP-II Index is useful for assessing and comparing palliative care development across countries.

摘要

背景

监测和报告姑息治疗的发展有助于确定进展以及有待改进的挑战。

目的

报告拉丁美洲姑息治疗发展的最新状况,制定并应用一个新的指数来衡量进展,并进行跨国比较。

方法

我们使用政策、教育、药品可及性和服务提供等指标,对为《拉丁美洲姑息治疗地图集》第一版(2012年)和第二版(2020年)收集的数据进行了二次分析。对拉丁美洲姑息治疗联盟(ALCP)指标进行了审查,并构建了ALCP指数-II,为每个指标添加z分数,用于将各国的发展程度分为高、中、低三个等级。

地点/参与者:17个拉丁美洲国家。

结果

拥有国家姑息治疗计划的国家数量从5个(29%)增加到9个(53%);本科阶段将姑息治疗作为独立学科的医学院校比例从4.2%增长到17.1%;阿片类吗啡当量人均分配量从6.6毫克增加到7.1毫克;服务数量从每百万人口1.5个增加到2.6个。姑息治疗服务的数量与开设姑息治疗课程的医学院校比例相关(斯皮尔曼相关系数Rs = 0.48;Rs = 0.34);与人均吗啡当量相关(Rs = 0.61;Rs = 0.72),但与国家计划的存在无关(p = 0.234;p = 0.074)。使用ALCP指数-II,乌拉圭、智利、哥斯达黎加、巴拿马、巴西和阿根廷排名最高,而其他国家则排在中间或最低组。乌拉圭得分最高(7.5),洪都拉斯最低(-3.59)。数值的离散度大于2012年记录的情况,显示出更大的异质性。

结论

拉丁美洲在姑息治疗发展方面取得了显著进展。ALCP-II指数有助于评估和比较各国的姑息治疗发展情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验