Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia; British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Division of Medical Microbiology and Virology, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Mol Diagn. 2021 Aug;23(8):907-919. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.04.014. Epub 2021 May 29.
Quantitative viral load assays have transformed our understanding of viral diseases. They hold similar potential to advance COVID-19 control and prevention, but SARS-CoV-2 viral load tests are not yet widely available. SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostic tests, which typically employ real-time RT-PCR, yield semiquantitative results only. Droplet digital RT-PCR (RT-ddPCR) offers an attractive platform for SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification. Eight primer/probe sets originally developed for real-time RT-PCR-based SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests were evaluated for use in RT-ddPCR; three were identified as the most efficient, precise, and sensitive for RT-ddPCR-based SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification. For example, the analytical efficiency for the E-Sarbeco primer/probe set was approximately 83%, whereas assay precision, measured as the coefficient of variation, was approximately 2% at 1000 input copies/reaction. Lower limits of quantification and detection for this primer/probe set were 18.6 and 4.4 input SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies/reaction, respectively. SARS-CoV-2 RNA viral loads in a convenience panel of 48 COVID-19-positive diagnostic specimens spanned a 6.2log range, confirming substantial viral load variation in vivo. RT-ddPCR-derived SARS-CoV-2 E gene copy numbers were further calibrated against cycle threshold values from a commercial real-time RT-PCR diagnostic platform. This log-linear relationship can be used to mathematically derive SARS-CoV-2 RNA copy numbers from cycle threshold values, allowing the wealth of available diagnostic test data to be harnessed to address foundational questions in SARS-CoV-2 biology.
定量病毒载量检测方法改变了我们对病毒疾病的认识。它们具有类似的潜力来推进 COVID-19 的控制和预防,但 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量检测尚未广泛应用。SARS-CoV-2 分子诊断检测通常采用实时 RT-PCR,只能提供半定量结果。液滴数字 RT-PCR(RT-ddPCR)为 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 定量提供了一个有吸引力的平台。最初为基于实时 RT-PCR 的 SARS-CoV-2 诊断检测开发的 8 个引物/探针组被评估用于 RT-ddPCR;其中 3 个被确定为最有效、最精确和最敏感的 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 定量 RT-ddPCR 引物/探针组。例如,E-Sarbeco 引物/探针组的分析效率约为 83%,而在 1000 个输入拷贝/反应时,测定精度(以变异系数表示)约为 2%。该引物/探针组的定量下限和检测下限分别为 18.6 和 4.4 个输入 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 拷贝/反应。48 份 COVID-19 阳性诊断标本的方便面板中的 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 病毒载量跨越了 6.2log 范围,证实了体内病毒载量的显著变化。RT-ddPCR 衍生的 SARS-CoV-2 E 基因拷贝数进一步与商业实时 RT-PCR 诊断平台的循环阈值进行校准。这种对数线性关系可用于从循环阈值值数学推导 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 拷贝数,从而利用大量可用的诊断测试数据来解决 SARS-CoV-2 生物学中的基础问题。