Wei Yu-Jen, Chen Yen-Ju, Lin Yung-Chieh, Kan Chung-Dann, Hsieh Min-Ling, Lin Yuh-Jyh, Wu Jing-Ming, Wang Jieh-Neng
Department of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70403, Taiwan.
Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70403, Taiwan.
Children (Basel). 2021 May 15;8(5):398. doi: 10.3390/children8050398.
Invasive interventions have been conducted in preterm infants with significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) when medical treatment has failed, and methods of invasive intervention have been reported. Surgical ligation via lateral thoracotomy has been a well-established procedure for decades. Recently, transcatheter occlusion has been safely and feasibly applied to the premature population. However, little research has been conducted on the benefits of transcatheter occlusion in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants compared to surgical ligation. This study compared transcatheter and surgical techniques in VLBW infants in terms of short-term respiratory outcomes. The medical records of 401 VLBW infants admitted to a tertiary hospital between September 2014 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who were diagnosed with a congenital anomaly, a chromosomal anomaly, or congenital heart disease, except for an inter-atrial shunt, were excluded. The perinatal conditions, neonatal morbidities, periprocedural vital signs, and respiratory support trajectories were compared between the transcatheter-treated and surgically ligated group. A total of 31 eligible VLBW infants received invasive intervention: 14 were treated with transcatheter occlusion (Group A), and 17 infants were treated with surgical ligation (Group B). Respiratory outcomes were not statistically significant between the two groups, despite Group A showing a trend toward early improvement in post-intervention respiratory trajectory. In this small case study, a different trend in post-intervention respiratory trajectories was observed. Future research with larger case numbers should be conducted to address our preliminary observations in more detail.
当药物治疗失败时,已对患有显著动脉导管未闭(PDA)的早产儿进行侵入性干预,并且已有侵入性干预方法的报道。经侧胸壁切开术进行手术结扎几十年来一直是一种成熟的手术。最近,经导管封堵已安全且可行地应用于早产儿群体。然而,与手术结扎相比,关于经导管封堵在极低出生体重(VLBW)婴儿中的益处的研究很少。本研究比较了VLBW婴儿经导管和手术技术在短期呼吸结局方面的差异。回顾性分析了2014年9月至2019年1月期间入住一家三级医院的401例VLBW婴儿的病历。排除诊断患有先天性异常、染色体异常或先天性心脏病(房间隔分流除外)的患者。比较经导管治疗组和手术结扎组之间的围产期情况、新生儿发病率、围手术期生命体征和呼吸支持轨迹。共有31例符合条件的VLBW婴儿接受了侵入性干预:14例接受经导管封堵治疗(A组),17例婴儿接受手术结扎治疗(B组)。尽管A组在干预后呼吸轨迹方面有早期改善的趋势,但两组之间的呼吸结局在统计学上无显著差异。在这个小病例研究中,观察到干预后呼吸轨迹的不同趋势。未来应进行更大病例数的研究,以更详细地探讨我们的初步观察结果。