Daniels Anthony B, Patel Shriji N, Milam Ronald W, Kohanim Sahar, Friedman Debra L, Koyama Tatsuki
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 6;13(9):2216. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092216.
To evaluate the relative efficacy of novel retinoblastoma treatments, eye classification-specific success rates for current standard-of-care intravenous chemotherapy regimens must be known. This meta-analysis included studies if: (1) patients received intravenous chemotherapy for retinoblastoma, (2) globe salvage data was reported, (3) only chemoreduction (with/without local consolidation) was used. The outcome measure was globe salvage success without need for salvage radiotherapy, subdivided by disease classification and chemotherapy regimen. Data from 27 studies (1483 eyes) were pooled. By Reese-Ellsworth classification, globe salvage rates were 85% (95%CI:73-92%) for Group I, 78% (95%CI:70-85%) for Group II, 68% (95%CI:56-78%) for Group III, 47% (95%CI:34-60%) for Group IV, and 35% (95%CI:26-45%) for Group V (Va: 35% [95%CI:21-54%]; Vb: 42% [95%CI:29-56%]; those without sub-classification: 31% [95%CI:19-47%]). By International Classification, globe salvage rates were 93% (95%CI:80-97%) for Group A, 83% (95%CI:73-89%) for Group B, 73% (95%CI:54-86%) for Group C, 40% (95%CI:31-51%) for Group D, and 19% (95%CI:5-50%) for Group E. Standard carboplatin-etoposide-vincristine out-performed two-drug regimens (odds ratio (OR) = 1.9 (95%CI:1.3-3.0) for Groups I-IV and OR = 2.1 (95%CI:1.3-3.4) for Group V; = 0.002 for each). For eyes with diffuse vitreous seeds (Vb), an enhanced regimen out-performed standard chemotherapy (OR = 2.4 [95%CI:1.3-4.7]; = 0.004). In conclusion, two-drug regimens were less effective for all eyes, whereas enhanced regimens were more effective for eyes with vitreous seeds. Novel therapies can now be compared to these baseline globe salvage rates.
为评估新型视网膜母细胞瘤治疗方法的相对疗效,必须了解当前标准护理静脉化疗方案针对不同眼部分类的成功率。本荟萃分析纳入符合以下条件的研究:(1)患者接受视网膜母细胞瘤静脉化疗;(2)报告了眼球挽救数据;(3)仅采用了化疗减积(伴或不伴局部巩固治疗)。观察指标为无需挽救性放疗的眼球挽救成功率,并按疾病分类和化疗方案进行细分。汇总了来自27项研究(1483只眼)的数据。根据里斯 - 埃尔斯沃思分类,I组眼球挽救率为85%(95%置信区间:73 - 92%),II组为78%(95%置信区间:70 - 85%),III组为68%(95%置信区间:56 - 78%),IV组为47%(95%置信区间:34 - 60%),V组为35%(95%置信区间:26 - 45%)(Va组:35% [95%置信区间:21 - 54%];Vb组:42% [95%置信区间:29 - 56%];未细分的:31% [95%置信区间:19 - 47%])。根据国际分类,A组眼球挽救率为93%(95%置信区间:80 - 97%),B组为83%(95%置信区间:73 - 89%),C组为73%(95%置信区间:54 - 86%),D组为40%(95%置信区间:31 - 51%),E组为19%(95%置信区间:5 - 50%)。标准的卡铂 - 依托泊苷 - 长春新碱方案优于两药方案(I - IV组优势比(OR) = 1.9(95%置信区间:1.3 - 3.0),V组OR = 2.1(95%置信区间:1.3 - 3.4);每组P = 0.002)。对于伴有弥漫性玻璃体种植(Vb)的眼睛,强化方案优于标准化疗(OR = 2.4 [95%置信区间:1.3 - 4.7];P = 0.004)。总之,两药方案对所有眼睛的疗效较差,而强化方案对伴有玻璃体种植的眼睛更有效。现在可以将新型疗法与这些基线眼球挽救率进行比较。