• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“外部”员工主动行为对其离职意愿的对比效应:一个有调节的中介模型。

Contrasting Effects of "External" Worker's Proactive Behavior on Their Turnover Intention: A Moderated Mediation Model.

作者信息

Kim Seonjo, Ishikawa Jun

机构信息

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Kanayagawa Campus, Fukushima University, Fukushima 960-1296, Japan.

College of Business, Rikkyo University, Tokyo 171-8501, Japan.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 May 6;11(5):70. doi: 10.3390/bs11050070.

DOI:10.3390/bs11050070
PMID:34066401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8148111/
Abstract

Interpersonal conflicts between portfolio career workers (hereafter, PCWs) who entered from the external labor market and existing permanent workers are a controversial workplace issue in South Korea. This study examines whether the existing permanent workers' responses to the newcomers speaking up depend on the type of proactive behavior, that is, whether PCWs speak within extra-role or in-role boundaries. We found that PCWs perceive more workplace ostracism when they are proactive outside their job boundaries and less workplace ostracism when they are proactive inside their job boundaries. Further, their perceptions of ostracism lead to intentions of turnover. These relationships are conditional on the type of employee-organization relationship and the PCWs' status in a new organization. Data were collected from 261 PCWs in Korea. Bootstrap-based conditional process analyses were utilized to test the hypothesized model. The results show that workplace ostracism mediates the relationship between the two types of proactive behavior and turnover intention, but in contrasting directions. The effect of the two types of proactive behavior on workplace ostracism is stronger for higher levels of reciprocal relationship between organization and employees, while the effect of workplace ostracism on turnover intention is stronger for higher levels of PCWs' status in a new organization. Thus, the workplace conflicts PCWs face not only represent interpersonal problems within the workplace but also constitute a multilayered phenomenon related to the long-term institutionalized relationships between organizations and employees.

摘要

从外部劳动力市场进入的组合职业者(以下简称PCW)与现有长期员工之间的人际冲突,是韩国一个颇具争议的职场问题。本研究考察了现有长期员工对新员工发声的反应是否取决于积极行为的类型,即PCW是在角色外还是角色内发声。我们发现,当PCW在工作边界之外积极行事时,他们会感受到更多的职场排斥;而当他们在工作边界之内积极行事时,感受到的职场排斥则较少。此外,他们对排斥的认知会导致离职意图。这些关系取决于员工与组织关系的类型以及PCW在新组织中的地位。数据收集自韩国的261名PCW。基于Bootstrap的条件过程分析被用于检验假设模型。结果表明,职场排斥在两种积极行为与离职意图之间起中介作用,但方向相反对于组织与员工之间较高水平的互惠关系,两种积极行为对职场排斥的影响更强;而对于PCW在新组织中的较高地位水平,职场排斥对离职意图的影响更强。因此,PCW面临的职场冲突不仅代表职场内的人际问题而且构成了一个与组织和员工之间长期制度化关系相关的多层次现象。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37be/8148111/e803fe12ca6a/behavsci-11-00070-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37be/8148111/ec332942c39f/behavsci-11-00070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37be/8148111/df1e3154bccc/behavsci-11-00070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37be/8148111/7538fc8cf311/behavsci-11-00070-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37be/8148111/e803fe12ca6a/behavsci-11-00070-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37be/8148111/ec332942c39f/behavsci-11-00070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37be/8148111/df1e3154bccc/behavsci-11-00070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37be/8148111/7538fc8cf311/behavsci-11-00070-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37be/8148111/e803fe12ca6a/behavsci-11-00070-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Contrasting Effects of "External" Worker's Proactive Behavior on Their Turnover Intention: A Moderated Mediation Model.“外部”员工主动行为对其离职意愿的对比效应:一个有调节的中介模型。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 May 6;11(5):70. doi: 10.3390/bs11050070.
2
Workplace ostracism influencing turnover intentions: Moderating roles of perceptions of organizational virtuousness and authentic leadership.职场排斥对离职意愿的影响:组织道德感认知与真实领导的调节作用
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Mar;243:104136. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104136. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
3
Personal care workers' intention to stay in residential aged care: An integrative review.个人护理工作者在养老院工作的意愿:综合评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Dec;80(12):4871-4887. doi: 10.1111/jan.16242. Epub 2024 May 23.
4
The Relationship Between Workplace Ostracism and Organizational Dehumanization: The Role of Need to Belong and its Outcomes.职场排斥与组织去人性化之间的关系:归属需求的作用及其结果。
Psychol Belg. 2023 Nov 8;63(1):120-137. doi: 10.5334/pb.1215. eCollection 2023.
5
Abusive supervision and newcomers' turnover intention: a perceived workplace ostracism perspective.abusive监督与新人离职意愿:基于感知到的职场排斥视角
J Gen Psychol. 2021 Oct-Dec;148(4):398-413. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2020.1751043. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
6
Harnessing Workplace Ostracism: Unleashing Proactive Behavior through Work Focus and Visionary Leadership.利用职场排斥:通过专注工作和有远见的领导激发积极行为。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 4;14(7):566. doi: 10.3390/bs14070566.
7
How does proactive personality affect employee creativity and ostracism? The mediating role of envy.积极主动型人格如何影响员工创造力和被排斥感?嫉妒的中介作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 9;10(4):e25457. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25457. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
8
Workplace ostracism in healthcare: Association with job satisfaction, stress, and perceived health.工作场所排斥与医疗保健:与工作满意度、压力和感知健康的关联。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 May;80(5):1813-1825. doi: 10.1111/jan.15934. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
9
The Relationship between Workplace Ostracism, TMX, Task Interdependence, and Task Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model.工作场所排斥、TMX、任务相互依赖与任务绩效的关系:一个有调节的中介模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 20;17(12):4432. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124432.
10
Workplace ostracism And workplace behaviors: A moderated mediation model of perceived stress and psychological empowerment.工作场所排斥与工作场所行为:感知压力和心理赋权的中介调节模型。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2018 May;31(3):304-317. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2018.1424835. Epub 2018 Jan 11.

本文引用的文献

1
A Moral Cleansing Process: How and When Does Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior Increase Prohibitive and Promotive Voice.一个道德净化过程:不道德的亲组织行为如何以及何时会增加禁止性和促进性建言。
J Bus Ethics. 2022;176(1):175-193. doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04697-w. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
2
The antecedents and outcomes of workplace ostracism: A meta-analysis.工作场所排斥的前因后果:一项元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Jun;105(6):577-596. doi: 10.1037/apl0000453. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
3
Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior.
放松道德推理以取胜:组织认同如何与不道德的亲组织行为相关。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Aug;101(8):1082-96. doi: 10.1037/apl0000111. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
4
Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions.调节中介假设的处理:理论、方法与建议。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):185-227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316.
5
Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: An organizational identification perspective.为什么和何时工作场所排斥会抑制组织公民行为:组织认同视角。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Mar;101(3):362-378. doi: 10.1037/apl0000063. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
6
Are proactive personalities always beneficial? Political skill as a moderator.积极主动的性格总是有益的吗?政治技巧作为调节因素。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 May;100(3):966-75. doi: 10.1037/a0037833. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
7
Unethical for the sake of the group: risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior.为了群体而不道德:社会排斥风险和亲群体不道德行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jan;100(1):98-113. doi: 10.1037/a0036708. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
8
Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison.他人报告的反生产工作行为是否比自我报告提供了更多的增量贡献?一项元分析比较。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 May;97(3):613-36. doi: 10.1037/a0026739. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
9
Unethical behavior in the name of the company: the moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior.以公司名义的不道德行为:组织认同和积极互惠信念对不道德亲组织行为的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jul;95(4):769-80. doi: 10.1037/a0019214.
10
Workplace victimization: aggression from the target's perspective.职场受侵害:从受害者角度看攻击行为
Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:717-41. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163703.