Suppr超能文献

使用米兰宠物生活质量量表(MPQL)来衡量新冠疫情期间宠物的生活质量。

Use of the Milan Pet Quality of Life Instrument (MPQL) to Measure Pets' Quality of Life during COVID-19.

作者信息

Piotti Patrizia, Karagiannis Christos, Satchell Liam, Michelazzi Manuela, Albertini Mariangela, Alleva Enrico, Pirrone Federica

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, 26900 Lodi, Italy.

Hellenic Institute of Canine and Feline Behaviour & Training, 10434 Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2021 May 8;11(5):1336. doi: 10.3390/ani11051336.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused lifestyle changes, with unknown effect on pets' quality of life (QoL). Between May and July 2020, we distributed an online survey to investigate the role of several factors on feline and canine QoL, including lockdown-related factors. We used existing scales to measure human and pets' personalities (Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Personality Questionnaire, RST-PQ; RST-Dog; RST-Cat) and the human-animal relationship (Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale, LAPS) and the Milan Pet Quality of Life instrument (MPQL). Overall, 235 participants reported about 242 adult pets (N = 78, N = 164). Factor analysis confirmed the structure and internal reliability of the existing scales (RST-PQ, RST-Dog, RST-Cat, LAPS) and suggested a four-factor structure for the MPQL (physical, psychological, social, environmental). The results indicate that the pets' psysical QoL was largely explained by pet-related elements (pets' demographics and life experience, and pets' personality). Conversely, the pets' psychological QoL was explained mostly by owner-related elements, such as the owners' demographics, COVID-19-related changes, and the owners' personality. Predictably, the pets' environmental QoL is mostly explained by environmental factors, such as the outdoor access in the home environment and the country. Finally, the pets' social QoL was explained by the larger combination of models: pets' characteristics and personality, environment and COVID-19-related changes, and the pet-human relationship. These findings can be explained by two non-mutually exclusive mechanisms. The reported changes may be a by-product of the COVID-19 pandemic's psychological and lifestyle effects on the owners, which in turn alter the way the owners interact with their pets and look after them. However, the owners' characteristics and mood may bias their answers regarding their pets.

摘要

新冠疫情导致了生活方式的改变,对宠物的生活质量(QoL)产生了未知影响。在2020年5月至7月期间,我们开展了一项在线调查,以探究包括与封锁相关因素在内的若干因素对猫和狗生活质量的影响。我们使用现有的量表来测量人类和宠物的性格(强化敏感性理论人格问卷,RST-PQ;RST-狗;RST-猫)、人与动物的关系(列克星敦宠物依恋量表,LAPS)以及米兰宠物生活质量工具(MPQL)。总体而言,235名参与者报告了约242只成年宠物(猫78只,狗164只)。因子分析证实了现有量表(RST-PQ、RST-狗、RST-猫、LAPS)的结构和内部信度,并提出了MPQL的四因素结构(身体、心理、社会、环境)。结果表明,宠物的身体生活质量在很大程度上由与宠物相关的因素所解释(宠物的人口统计学特征和生活经历,以及宠物的性格)。相反,宠物的心理生活质量主要由与主人相关的因素所解释,例如主人的人口统计学特征、与新冠疫情相关的变化以及主人的性格。可以预见,宠物的环境生活质量主要由环境因素所解释,例如家庭环境和所在地区的户外出行条件。最后,宠物的社会生活质量由多种因素共同解释:宠物的特征和性格、环境以及与新冠疫情相关的变化,以及人与宠物的关系。这些发现可以由两种并非相互排斥的机制来解释。所报告的变化可能是新冠疫情对主人心理和生活方式产生影响的副产品,进而改变了主人与宠物互动及照顾它们的方式。然而,主人的特征和情绪可能会使他们在回答有关宠物的问题时产生偏差。

相似文献

2
Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Behavioural Tendencies of Cats and Dogs in Japan.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jul 6;13(13):2217. doi: 10.3390/ani13132217.
3
How pets factor into healthcare decisions for COVID-19: A One Health perspective.
One Health. 2020 Dec 20;11:100176. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100176. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
4
Retrospective survey of owners' experiences with palliative radiation therapy for pets.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2018 Aug 1;253(3):307-314. doi: 10.2460/javma.253.3.307.
5
Owners' view of their pets' emotions, intellect, and mutual relationship: Cats and dogs compared.
Behav Processes. 2017 Aug;141(Pt 3):316-321. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
8
Risk of Foodborne Illness from Pet Food: Assessing Pet Owners' Knowledge, Behavior, and Risk Perception.
J Food Prot. 2020 Nov;83(11):1998-2007. doi: 10.4315/JFP-20-108. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
9
Profiling Italian cat and dog owners' perceptions of pet food quality traits.
BMC Vet Res. 2020 May 11;16(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02357-9.

引用本文的文献

3
Pet acquisition trends and veterinary care access in the US.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 2;20(7):e0325075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325075. eCollection 2025.
5
Life with pets study: lower income veterinary clients' perception of pets' quality of life.
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jul 17;11:1422359. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1422359. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
One welfare impacts of COVID-19 - A summary of key highlights within the one welfare framework.
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2021 Mar;236:105262. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105262. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
2
The effect of premature maternal separation on distress vocalizations and activity in kittens () during a brief nest separation.
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2020 Nov;232. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105130. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
Job Insecurity and Financial Concern During the COVID-19 Pandemic Are Associated With Worse Mental Health.
J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Sep;62(9):686-691. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001962.
5
The effects of the Spanish COVID-19 lockdown on people, their pets, and the human-animal bond.
J Vet Behav. 2020 Nov-Dec;40:75-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2020.05.013. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
6
Impact of Covid-19 on animal welfare.
Vet Rec. 2020 Sep 5;187(5):e31. doi: 10.1136/vr.m3265. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
7
The impact of physical activity on psychological health during Covid-19 pandemic in Italy.
Heliyon. 2020 Jun 24;6(6):e04315. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04315. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
Functional Fear Predicts Public Health Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021;19(5):1875-1888. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
9
Making the Case for Multi-Axis Assessment of Behavioural Problems.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Feb 27;10(3):383. doi: 10.3390/ani10030383.
10
Age-related positivity effect on behavioural responses of dogs to human vocalisations.
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):20201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56636-z.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验