• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估使用 AGoRA 助行器进行助行步态时的身体相互作用:基于虚拟机械刚度的策略。

Evaluation of Physical Interaction during Walker-Assisted Gait with the AGoRA Walker: Strategies Based on Virtual Mechanical Stiffness.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Colombian School of Engineering Julio Garavito, Bogotá 111166, Colombia.

EPF-Graduate School of Engineering, F-92330 Sceaux, France.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 7;21(9):3242. doi: 10.3390/s21093242.

DOI:10.3390/s21093242
PMID:34067133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8125083/
Abstract

Smart walkers are commonly used as potential gait assistance devices, to provide physical and cognitive assistance within rehabilitation and clinical scenarios. To understand such rehabilitation processes, several biomechanical studies have been conducted to assess human gait with passive and active walkers. Several sessions were conducted with 11 healthy volunteers to assess three interaction strategies based on passive, low and high mechanical stiffness values on the AGoRA Smart Walker. The trials were carried out in a motion analysis laboratory. Kinematic data were also collected from the smart walker sensory interface. The interaction force between users and the device was recorded. The force required under passive and low stiffness modes was 56.66% and 67.48% smaller than the high stiffness mode, respectively. An increase of 17.03% for the hip range of motion, as well as the highest trunk's inclination, were obtained under the resistive mode, suggesting a compensating motion to exert a higher impulse force on the device. Kinematic and physical interaction data suggested that the high stiffness mode significantly affected the users' gait pattern. Results suggested that users compensated their kinematics, tilting their trunk and lower limbs to exert higher impulse forces on the device.

摘要

智能助行器通常被用作潜在的步态辅助设备,在康复和临床环境中提供身体和认知方面的辅助。为了理解这些康复过程,已经进行了几项生物力学研究,以评估被动和主动助行器下的人体步态。对 11 名健康志愿者进行了几次测试,以评估基于 AGoRA 智能助行器的被动、低和高机械刚度值的三种交互策略。试验在运动分析实验室进行。还从智能助行器的感应接口收集了运动学数据。记录了使用者与设备之间的相互作用力。在被动和低刚度模式下,所需的力分别比高刚度模式小 56.66%和 67.48%。在阻力模式下,髋关节活动范围增加了 17.03%,同时躯干倾斜度最高,这表明为了对设备施加更高的冲击力,人体会进行补偿运动。运动学和物理相互作用数据表明,高刚度模式显著影响了使用者的步态模式。结果表明,使用者通过倾斜躯干和下肢来补偿运动学,从而对设备施加更高的冲击力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/495d/8125083/1d85aeac6042/sensors-21-03242-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/495d/8125083/d4a1e63f317a/sensors-21-03242-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/495d/8125083/15e3a3beb74f/sensors-21-03242-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/495d/8125083/9591c5d501ee/sensors-21-03242-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/495d/8125083/809de79bf2cb/sensors-21-03242-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/495d/8125083/cf554ea8d017/sensors-21-03242-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/495d/8125083/1d85aeac6042/sensors-21-03242-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/495d/8125083/d4a1e63f317a/sensors-21-03242-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/495d/8125083/15e3a3beb74f/sensors-21-03242-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/495d/8125083/9591c5d501ee/sensors-21-03242-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/495d/8125083/809de79bf2cb/sensors-21-03242-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/495d/8125083/cf554ea8d017/sensors-21-03242-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/495d/8125083/1d85aeac6042/sensors-21-03242-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Physical Interaction during Walker-Assisted Gait with the AGoRA Walker: Strategies Based on Virtual Mechanical Stiffness.评估使用 AGoRA 助行器进行助行步态时的身体相互作用:基于虚拟机械刚度的策略。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 7;21(9):3242. doi: 10.3390/s21093242.
2
Analysis of Gait Kinematics in Smart Walker-Assisted Locomotion in Immersive Virtual Reality Scenario.沉浸式虚拟现实场景中智能助行器辅助行走的步态运动学分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Aug 27;24(17):5534. doi: 10.3390/s24175534.
3
The effect of horizontal forces from a Smart Walker on gait and perceived exertion.智能助行器产生的水平力对步态和主观用力感觉的影响。
Assist Technol. 2022 Mar 4;34(2):204-212. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2020.1744771. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
4
Human-Robot-Environment Interaction Interface for Smart Walker Assisted Gait: AGoRA Walker.用于智能助行器辅助步态的人机环境交互界面:AGoRA助行器
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jun 30;19(13):2897. doi: 10.3390/s19132897.
5
Do orthotic walkers affect knee and hip function during gait?矫形步行器在步态过程中会影响膝关节和髋关节功能吗?
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016 Feb;40(1):137-41. doi: 10.1177/0309364614546525. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
6
Collaborative robotic biomechanical interactions and gait adjustments in young, non-impaired individuals.年轻非残疾个体的协作机器人生物力学交互与步态调整。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Jun 16;13(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0166-1.
7
Assessment of a Robotic Walker in Older Adults With Parkinson's Disease in Daily Living Activities.帕金森病老年人日常生活活动中机器人助行器的评估
Front Neurorobot. 2021 Dec 14;15:742281. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.742281. eCollection 2021.
8
Role and Significance of Trunk and Upper Extremity Muscles in Walker-Assisted Paraplegic Gait: A Case Study.躯干和上肢肌肉在助行器辅助截瘫步态中的作用及意义:一项病例研究
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Winter;24(1):18-27. doi: 10.1310/sci16-00061. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
9
Semi-Remote Gait Assistance Interface: A Joystick with Visual Feedback Capabilities for Therapists.半远程步态辅助接口:带视觉反馈功能的治疗师用操纵杆。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 19;21(10):3521. doi: 10.3390/s21103521.
10
An instrumented walker in three-dimensional gait analysis: Improving musculoskeletal estimates in the lower limb mobility impaired.三维步态分析中的仪器化助行器:改善下肢运动功能受损患者的肌肉骨骼评估。
Gait Posture. 2022 Mar;93:142-145. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.01.023. Epub 2022 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Gait Kinematics in Smart Walker-Assisted Locomotion in Immersive Virtual Reality Scenario.沉浸式虚拟现实场景中智能助行器辅助行走的步态运动学分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Aug 27;24(17):5534. doi: 10.3390/s24175534.
2
Changes in Distance between a Wearable Robotic Exoskeleton User and Four-Wheeled Walker during Gait in Level and Slope Conditions: Implications for Fall Prevention Systems.在水平和斜坡条件下行走时,可穿戴机器人外骨骼使用者与四轮助行器之间距离的变化:对跌倒预防系统的启示
Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 May 23;8(2):213. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8020213.
3
Assessment of a Robotic Walker in Older Adults With Parkinson's Disease in Daily Living Activities.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of horizontal forces from a Smart Walker on gait and perceived exertion.智能助行器产生的水平力对步态和主观用力感觉的影响。
Assist Technol. 2022 Mar 4;34(2):204-212. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2020.1744771. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
2
Biomechanical analysis of the golf swing: methodological effect of angular velocity component on the identification of the kinematic sequence.高尔夫挥杆动作的生物力学分析:角速度分量对运动学顺序识别的方法学影响。
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2019;21(2):115-120.
3
Walking with rollator: a systematic review of gait parameters in older persons.
帕金森病老年人日常生活活动中机器人助行器的评估
Front Neurorobot. 2021 Dec 14;15:742281. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.742281. eCollection 2021.
使用助行器行走:老年人步态参数的系统评价
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2019 Sep 10;16:15. doi: 10.1186/s11556-019-0222-5. eCollection 2019.
4
A Novel Multimodal Cognitive Interaction for Walker-Assisted Rehabilitation Therapies.一种用于步行辅助康复治疗的新型多模态认知交互
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2019 Jun;2019:905-910. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779469.
5
Identifying the Effects of Assistive and Resistive Guidance on the Gait of Elderly People Using a Smart Walker.使用智能助行器识别辅助性和阻力性引导对老年人步态的影响。
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2019 Jun;2019:198-203. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779556.
6
Human-Robot-Environment Interaction Interface for Smart Walker Assisted Gait: AGoRA Walker.用于智能助行器辅助步态的人机环境交互界面:AGoRA助行器
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jun 30;19(13):2897. doi: 10.3390/s19132897.
7
Evaluation of biomechanical gait parameters of patients with Cerebral Palsy at three different levels of gait assistance using the CPWalker.使用 CPWalker 评估脑瘫患者在三种不同步态辅助水平下的生物力学步态参数。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Jan 28;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0485-0.
8
Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 21-40 year olds: CADENCE-adults.21-40 岁人群的步频(步/分钟)和强度:CADENCE-成年人。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Jan 17;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0769-6.
9
Experimental comparisons of passive and powered ankle-foot orthoses in individuals with limb reconstruction.被动式和动力式踝足矫形器在肢体重建患者中的实验比较。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Nov 21;15(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0455-y.
10
A review of the historical use and criticisms of gait analysis evidence.步态分析证据的历史应用及相关批评综述。
Sci Justice. 2018 Jul;58(4):292-298. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 7.