• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Tobacco Control as an LGBTQ+ Issue: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Recommendations from LGBTQ+ Community Leaders.将烟草控制作为一个 LGBTQ+ 问题:LGBTQ+ 社区领袖的知识、态度与建议
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 22;18(11):5546. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115546.
2
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and gender diverse and queer (LGBTQ) community members' perspectives on palliative care in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)的女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和性别多样化(LGBTQ)群体对姑息治疗的看法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5926-e5945. doi: 10.1111/hsc.14024. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
3
Nurse leaders' recommendations for implementing LGBTQ+ inclusive practices in health systems: A qualitative descriptive study.护士领导者关于在卫生系统中实施包容 LGBTQ+ 群体做法的建议:一项定性描述性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Oct 31;7:100262. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100262. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
"We're always an afterthought"- Designing tobacco control campaigns for dissemination with and to LGBTQ +-serving community organizations: a thematic analysis.“我们总是被忽视的一方”——为 LGBTQ 服务的社区组织设计传播烟草控制活动的主题分析。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Aug;34(8):673-682. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01706-x. Epub 2023 May 9.
5
LGBTQ Utilization of a Statewide Tobacco Quitline: Engagement and Quitting Behavior, 2010-2022.LGBTQ 人群对全州范围内戒烟热线的使用情况:参与度和戒烟行为,2010-2022 年。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Jan 1;26(1):54-62. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad160.
6
The Impact of Generative Conversational Artificial Intelligence on the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Community: Scoping Review.生成式对话人工智能对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿群体的影响:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 6;25:e52091. doi: 10.2196/52091.
7
Community Voices: A Qualitative Study Exploring Perceptions of Menthol Cigarette Sales Restrictions in Los Angeles County Among Black Adults Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes.社区声音:一项定性研究,探讨洛杉矶县吸薄荷烟的黑人成年人对薄荷烟销售限制的看法。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 May 31;26(Supplement_2):S82-S88. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad141.
8
A Comparison of Alternative Tobacco Product Usage, Knowledge and Beliefs Between the New York City Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered Community and Heterosexuals.《纽约市男女同性恋、双性恋和变性群体与异性恋者对替代烟草产品使用、知识和看法的比较》
J Community Health. 2017 Oct;42(5):903-910. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0332-9.
9
Improving dissemination products and practices for community-based organisations serving LGBTQ+ communities in the USA: a thematic analysis.改善美国为 LGBTQ+ 社区服务的社区组织的传播产品与实践:一项主题分析。
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Nov 7;2(2):e001106. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001106. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
A Qualitative Study of Rapid HIV Testing and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Competency in the Oral Health Setting: Practices and Attitudes of New York State Dental Directors.口腔健康环境中快速艾滋病毒检测及女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者和酷儿能力的定性研究:纽约州牙科主任的实践与态度
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2018;16(4):333-338. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a40958.

引用本文的文献

1
Internalized Homophobia and Cigarette Use Among Latino and Black Sexual Minority Men: Protective and Risk Factors.拉丁裔和黑人性少数男性的内化恐同心理与吸烟行为:保护因素和风险因素
Stigma Health. 2025 Mar 10. doi: 10.1037/sah0000625.
2
Prevalence of Tobacco and Poly-Tobacco Use as a Function of Sexual Orientation Identity and Sex.烟草及多种烟草使用情况与性取向身份及性别的关系
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Dec 4. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae292.
3
Association Between Exposure to LGBTQ-Targeted Tobacco Marketing and Tobacco Use Behaviors Among US Young Adults.美国年轻成年人接触针对LGBTQ群体的烟草营销与烟草使用行为之间的关联。
Subst Use Misuse. 2025;60(3):414-420. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2434011. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
4
The Intersection of Sexual Orientation, Substance Use, and Mental Health: Findings from Hints 5.性取向、物质使用与心理健康的交叉点:来自HINTS 5的研究结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;12(20):2083. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12202083.
5
Marketing Strategies Used by Tobacco Companies Targeting the Queer Community.烟草公司针对同性恋群体采用的营销策略。
Tob Use Insights. 2024 Jul 20;17:1179173X241265743. doi: 10.1177/1179173X241265743. eCollection 2024.
6
From Invisibility to Inclusion: A Call to Action to Address COPD Disparities in the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer+ Community.从隐形到包容:呼吁采取行动解决女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者及酷儿群体中慢性阻塞性肺疾病的差异问题
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2024 May 29;11(3):326-330. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0496.
7
Cannabis Use Differences Among Sexual Minority Versus Heterosexual Females and Males in Oklahoma: The Roles of Mental Health, Cannabis Perceptions, and Cannabis Marketing Exposure.俄克拉荷马州性少数群体与异性恋女性和男性在大麻使用方面的差异:心理健康、大麻认知和大麻营销接触的作用。
Subst Use Addctn J. 2024 Jan;45(1):101-113. doi: 10.1177/29767342231208519.
8
Health inequities across the lung cancer care continuum in ten marginalized populations: a narrative review.十个边缘化群体肺癌护理连续过程中的健康不平等:一项叙述性综述
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Nov 30;15(11):6345-6361. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-727. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
9
Comprehensive review of the national surveys that assess E-cigarette use domains among youth and adults in the United States.对评估美国青少年和成年人电子烟使用领域的全国性调查的全面综述。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Jun 7;23:100528. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100528. eCollection 2023 Jul.
10
Awareness of LGBTQ+ health disparities: A survey study of complementary integrative health providers.对 LGBTQ+ 群体健康差异的认知:一项针对补充与整合医学从业者的调查研究。
J Chiropr Educ. 2023 Oct 1;37(2):124-136. doi: 10.7899/JCE-22-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Tobacco Product Use Among Adults - United States, 2019.成年人烟草制品使用情况 - 美国,2019 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Nov 20;69(46):1736-1742. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6946a4.
2
The US Cigarette Industry: An Economic and Marketing Perspective.美国烟草行业:经济与营销视角
Tob Regul Sci. 2019 Mar;5(2):156-168. doi: 10.18001/trs.5.2.7.
3
California advocates' perspectives on challenges and risks of advancing the tobacco endgame.加利福尼亚倡导者对推进烟草终结策略的挑战和风险的看法。
J Public Health Policy. 2020 Sep;41(3):321-333. doi: 10.1057/s41271-020-00230-5.
4
Receipt of direct tobacco mail/email coupons and coupon redemption: Demographic and socioeconomic disparities among adult smokers in the United States.收到直接邮寄/电子邮件烟草优惠券及优惠券兑换情况:美国成年吸烟者的人口统计学和社会经济差异
Prev Med. 2019 Sep;126:105778. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105778. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
5
Exposure to Multimedia Tobacco Marketing and Product Use Among Youth: A Longitudinal Analysis.青少年接触多媒体烟草营销和产品使用情况:一项纵向分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 May 26;22(6):1036-1040. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz096.
6
Tobacco Industry Promotions and Pricing After Tax Increases: An Analysis of Internal Industry Documents.烟草业提税后的促销和定价:对行业内文件的分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 May 26;22(6):967-974. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz068.
7
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) View it Differently Than Non-LGBT: Exposure to Tobacco-related Couponing, E-cigarette Advertisements, and Anti-tobacco Messages on Social and Traditional Media.同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者(LGBT)与非 LGBT 群体的看法不同:在社交媒体和传统媒体上接触与烟草相关的优惠券、电子烟广告和反烟草信息。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Mar 30;21(4):513-522. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty049.
8
Success in the city: the road to implementation of Tobacco 21 and Sensible Tobacco Enforcement in New York City.城市中的成功:纽约市实施《21岁烟草销售限制法》及合理烟草执法之路。
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i6-i9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053089.
9
LGBT organisation successfully advocated for ban on tobacco promotions in San Jose, California.同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者组织在加利福尼亚州圣何塞成功倡导禁止烟草促销活动。
Tob Control. 2016 Sep;25(5):504-5. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052660. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
10
Reducing tobacco use and access through strengthened minimum price laws.通过强化最低价格法规减少烟草使用和获取。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Oct;104(10):1844-50. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302069. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

将烟草控制作为一个 LGBTQ+ 问题:LGBTQ+ 社区领袖的知识、态度与建议

Tobacco Control as an LGBTQ+ Issue: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Recommendations from LGBTQ+ Community Leaders.

作者信息

Acosta-Deprez Veronica, Jou Judy, London Marisa, Ai Mike, Chu Carolyn, Cermak Nhi, Kozlovich Shannon

机构信息

Department of Health Science, California State University, Long Beach, CA 90802, USA.

OUT Against Big Tobacco Program, Equality California, Los Angeles, CA 90010, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 22;18(11):5546. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115546.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18115546
PMID:34067341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8196887/
Abstract

Tobacco companies use price discounts, including coupons and rebates, to market their products. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) communities are targeted by these marketing strategies, contributing to inequitably high tobacco use. Some localities have adopted policies restricting tobacco price discounts; for successful implementation, community buy-in is crucial. From July-October 2018, Equality California staff conducted semi-structured interviews with seven participants in Los Angeles, CA. Themes included familiarity with tobacco price discounts, their perceived impact on tobacco use in LGBTQ+ communities, and attitudes toward potential policy restrictions. Interview notes were analyzed using a deductive approach to qualitative analysis. Awareness of tobacco price discounts varied; some interviewees were familiar, while others expressed surprise at their ubiquity. Price discounts were seen to disproportionately impact LGBTQ+ individuals, especially those who additionally identify with other vulnerable groups, including young people and communities of color. Support for policy restrictions was unanimous; however, interviewees expressed concern over political opposition and emphasized a need for culturally competent outreach to LGBTQ+ communities. Community organizations are essential in mobilizing support for policy reform. Understanding the perceptions and recommendations of community leaders provides tools for policy action, likely improving outcomes to reduce LGBTQ+ tobacco use through restricting tobacco price discounts.

摘要

烟草公司利用价格折扣,包括优惠券和回扣,来推销他们的产品。女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者和酷儿(LGBTQ+)群体成为这些营销策略的目标对象,导致烟草使用量高得不公平。一些地方已经采取政策限制烟草价格折扣;为了成功实施,社区的支持至关重要。2018年7月至10月,加利福尼亚平等组织的工作人员对加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的七名参与者进行了半结构化访谈。主题包括对烟草价格折扣的熟悉程度、他们认为其对LGBTQ+群体烟草使用的影响,以及对潜在政策限制的态度。访谈记录采用演绎定性分析方法进行分析。对烟草价格折扣的认知各不相同;一些受访者很熟悉,而另一些人对其普遍存在表示惊讶。人们认为价格折扣对LGBTQ+个体的影响尤为严重,尤其是那些还认同其他弱势群体的人,包括年轻人和有色人种社区。对政策限制的支持是一致的;然而,受访者对政治反对表示担忧,并强调需要对LGBTQ+群体进行有文化能力的宣传。社区组织对于动员对政策改革的支持至关重要。了解社区领袖的看法和建议为政策行动提供了工具,通过限制烟草价格折扣,可能会改善减少LGBTQ+群体烟草使用的成果。