Suppr超能文献

不同替代酶联免疫吸附测定法(sELISA)检测新型冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)中和抗体的效用

Utility of Different Surrogate Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (sELISAs) for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies.

作者信息

Kohmer Niko, Rühl Cornelia, Ciesek Sandra, Rabenau Holger F

机构信息

Institute for Medical Virology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.

German Centre for Infection Research, External Partner Site, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 May 14;10(10):2128. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102128.

Abstract

The plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) is a preferred method for the detection of functional, SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralizing antibodies from serum samples. Alternatively, surrogate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) using ACE2 as the target structure for the detection of neutralization-competent antibodies have been developed. They are capable of high throughput, have a short turnaround time, and can be performed under standard laboratory safety conditions. However, there are very limited data on their clinical performance and how they compare to the PRNT. We evaluated three surrogate immunoassays (GenScript SARS-CoV-2 Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test Kit (GenScript Biotech, Piscataway Township, NJ, USA), the TECO SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Antibody Assay (TECOmedical AG, Sissach, Switzerland), and the Leinco COVID-19 ImmunoRank™ Neutralization MICRO-ELISA (Leinco Technologies, Fenton, MO, USA)) and one automated quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein-based IgG antibody assay (Abbott GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany) by testing 78 clinical samples, including several follow-up samples of six BNT162b2 (BioNTech/Pfizer, Mainz, Germany/New York, NY, USA) vaccinated individuals. Using the PRNT as a reference method, the overall sensitivity of the examined assays ranged from 93.8 to 100% and specificity ranged from 73.9 to 91.3%. Weighted kappa demonstrated a substantial to almost perfect agreement. The findings of our study allow these assays to be considered when a PRNT is not available. However, the latter still should be the preferred choice. For optimal clinical performance, the cut-off value of the TECO assay should be individually adapted.

摘要

空斑减少中和试验(PRNT)是一种从血清样本中检测功能性新冠病毒特异性中和抗体的首选方法。另外,也已开发出以血管紧张素转换酶2(ACE2)作为检测中和活性抗体的靶结构的替代酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)。它们能够进行高通量检测,周转时间短,并且可以在标准实验室安全条件下进行。然而,关于其临床性能以及与PRNT相比情况的数据非常有限。我们通过检测78份临床样本(包括6名接种BNT162b2(德国美因茨/美国纽约州的BioNTech/辉瑞公司)疫苗个体的若干随访样本),评估了三种替代免疫测定方法(金斯瑞新冠病毒替代病毒中和试验试剂盒(美国新泽西州皮斯卡塔韦镇的金斯瑞生物科技公司)、TECO新冠病毒中和抗体测定(瑞士锡萨赫的TECOmedical AG公司)和莱因科新冠病毒免疫等级™中和微孔ELISA(美国密苏里州芬顿的莱因科技术公司))以及一种基于新冠病毒刺突蛋白的自动化定量IgG抗体测定方法(德国威斯巴登的雅培有限公司)。以PRNT作为参考方法,所检测测定方法的总体灵敏度范围为93.8%至100%,特异性范围为73.9%至91.3%。加权kappa显示出实质性至几乎完美的一致性。我们的研究结果表明,在无法进行PRNT时可以考虑这些测定方法。然而,PRNT仍然应该是首选。为了获得最佳临床性能,TECO测定方法的临界值应进行个体化调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1d0/8157164/0adccec7e3eb/jcm-10-02128-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验