Mattar Rahif E, Sulimany Ayman M, Binsaleh Saad S, Al-Majed Ibrahim M
Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
Children (Basel). 2021 May 25;8(6):444. doi: 10.3390/children8060444.
This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the patient's preference and chair time needed during pit and fissure sealant placement under three isolation techniques (Isolite system, rubber dam isolation, and cotton roll isolation). Participants, aged 6-15 years and requiring four sealants on the first or second permanent molars, attending the pediatric dental clinics at King Saud University in Saudi Arabia were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria. Each participant received sealants on three random first or second permanent molars using three isolation techniques. The time required for sealant placement was recorded for each technique. Following sealant placement, an interview-based questionnaire was administered to the participants to evaluate their preference regarding the isolation techniques. Forty-eight children (23 male and 25 female) with a mean age of 8.58 ± 1.93 years participated in this study. The mean chair times were 248.14, 255.89, and 243.29 s for the Isolite system, rubber dam isolation, and cotton roll isolation, respectively. Approximately 79% of participants considered cotton roll isolation to be the most comfortable, whereas approximately 71% were significantly less likely to use rubber dam isolation again. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in sealant placement time among the three isolation techniques. However, cotton roll isolation was the technique that was most preferred by the participants.
这项随机临床试验旨在评估在三种隔离技术(Isolite系统、橡皮障隔离和棉卷隔离)下进行窝沟封闭时患者的偏好以及所需的椅旁操作时间。年龄在6至15岁、需要对第一或第二恒磨牙进行四颗牙齿封闭的参与者,按照纳入标准入选,他们在沙特阿拉伯国王沙特大学的儿科牙科诊所就诊。每位参与者使用三种隔离技术,在三颗随机选择的第一或第二恒磨牙上进行封闭。记录每种技术进行封闭所需的时间。封闭完成后,对参与者进行基于访谈的问卷调查,以评估他们对隔离技术的偏好。48名儿童(23名男性和25名女性)参与了本研究,平均年龄为8.58±1.93岁。Isolite系统、橡皮障隔离和棉卷隔离的平均椅旁操作时间分别为248.14秒、255.89秒和243.29秒。约79%的参与者认为棉卷隔离最舒适,而约71%的参与者表示再次使用橡皮障隔离的可能性显著降低。总之,三种隔离技术在封闭时间上无显著差异。然而,棉卷隔离是参与者最偏好的技术。