Vali Yasaman, Lee Jenny, Boursier Jérôme, Spijker René, Verheij Joanne, Brosnan M Julia, Anstee Quentin M, Bossuyt Patrick M, Zafarmand Mohammad Hadi
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, Angers University Hospital, 49933 Angers, France.
J Clin Med. 2021 May 29;10(11):2415. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112415.
(1) Background: FibroTest™ is a multi-marker panel, suggested by guidelines as one of the surrogate markers with acceptable performance for detecting fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). A number of studies evaluating this test have been published after publication of the guidelines. This study aims to produce summary estimates of FibroTest™ diagnostic accuracy. (2) Methods: Five databases were searched for studies that evaluated FibroTest™ against liver biopsy as the reference standard in NAFLD patients. Two authors independently screened the references, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. Meta-analyses of the accuracy in detecting different levels of fibrosis were performed using the bivariate random-effects model and the linear mixed-effects multiple thresholds model. (3) Results: From ten included studies, seven were eligible for inclusion in our meta-analysis. Five studies were included in the meta-analysis of FibroTest™ in detecting advanced fibrosis and five in significant fibrosis, resulting in an AUC of 0.77 for both target conditions. The meta-analysis of three studies resulted in an AUC of 0.69 in detecting any fibrosis, while analysis of three other studies showed higher accuracy in cirrhosis (AUC: 0.92). (4) Conclusions: Our meta-analysis showed acceptable performance (AUC > 0.80) of FibroTest™ only in detecting cirrhosis. We observed more limited performance of the test in detecting significant and advanced fibrosis in NAFLD patients. Further primary studies with high methodological quality are required to validate the reliability of the test for detecting different fibrosis levels and to compare the performance of the test in different settings.
(1)背景:FibroTest™是一种多标志物组合,被指南推荐为检测非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)患者纤维化的性能可接受的替代标志物之一。在指南发布后,已经发表了许多评估该检测的研究。本研究旨在得出FibroTest™诊断准确性的汇总估计值。(2)方法:检索了五个数据库,以寻找评估FibroTest™并以肝活检作为NAFLD患者参考标准的研究。两位作者独立筛选参考文献、提取数据并评估纳入研究的质量。使用双变量随机效应模型和线性混合效应多阈值模型对检测不同纤维化水平的准确性进行荟萃分析。(3)结果:在纳入的十项研究中,七项符合纳入我们荟萃分析的条件。五项研究纳入了FibroTest™检测晚期纤维化的荟萃分析,五项纳入了检测显著纤维化的荟萃分析,两种目标情况的曲线下面积(AUC)均为0.77。三项研究的荟萃分析得出检测任何纤维化的AUC为0.69,而其他三项研究的分析显示在肝硬化检测中准确性更高(AUC:0.92)。(4)结论:我们的荟萃分析表明,FibroTest™仅在检测肝硬化方面具有可接受的性能(AUC>0.80)。我们观察到该检测在检测NAFLD患者的显著和晚期纤维化方面性能更有限。需要进一步开展方法学质量高的原发性研究,以验证该检测在检测不同纤维化水平方面的可靠性,并比较该检测在不同情况下的性能。