Nsumbu Jean-Bonny, Makulo Jean-Robert, Mutombo Tshiswaka Trésor, Kisoka Lusunsi Christian, Nlombi Mbendi Charles
Unit of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Congo.
Unit of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Hôpital Médecins de Nuit SARL, Kinshasa, Congo.
Hepat Med. 2025 Jul 15;17:27-37. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S533064. eCollection 2025.
Several non-invasive tests are used to assess liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with liver disease. However, most validation studies have not included populations in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the APRI and FIB-4 scores in a Congolese cohort.
A cohort of patients in Kinshasa underwent FibroScan and laboratory testing to calculate APRI and FIB-4 scores. Pearson correlation, sensitivity, specificity, and ROC curve analyses were used to evaluate the performance of these non-invasive scores against FibroScan. Cirrhosis was defined as liver stiffness ≥14 kPa by FibroScan. Thresholds for APRI and FIB-4 scores predicting cirrhosis were set at ≥ 1.5 and ≥ 2.67, respectively.
The study included 316 patients (mean ± SD age: 48.1 ± 14.1 years; 60.8% male; 10.1% with diabetes; 37.1% obese; 14.2% with hepatitis B; 6.7% with hepatitis C; 25.6% with a history of alcohol use). The Pearson correlation between APRI and FibroScan was r = 0.210 (p < 0.001), while the correlation between FIB-4 and FibroScan was better (r = 0.478, p < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, FIB-4 correlated with FibroScan only among patients with alcohol use or hepatitis B or C, APRI only correlated with FibroScan in alcohol dependent patients. The sensitivity and specificity of APRI were 29.7% and 97.9% respectively, compared to 60.0% and 93.3% for FibroScan. The areas under the ROC curve were 0.8462 for APRI and 0.8312 for FIB-4, with thresholds lower than those reported in the literature: 0.422 for APRI and 1.285 for FIB-4, but these varied according to the subgroup.
APRI and FIB-4 scores demonstrate high specificity but low sensitivity for diagnosing cirrhosis in this population. Their diagnostic performance is notably better in patients with alcohol-related liver disease or viral hepatitis, but poor among those with diabetes or obesity.
多种非侵入性检测方法用于评估肝病患者的肝纤维化和肝硬化情况。然而,大多数验证研究未纳入撒哈拉以南非洲地区的人群。本研究旨在评估刚果人群中APRI和FIB-4评分的诊断性能。
金沙萨的一组患者接受了FibroScan检查和实验室检测,以计算APRI和FIB-4评分。采用Pearson相关性分析、敏感性分析、特异性分析和ROC曲线分析来评估这些非侵入性评分相对于FibroScan的性能。肝硬化定义为FibroScan检测的肝脏硬度≥14 kPa。APRI和FIB-4评分预测肝硬化的阈值分别设定为≥1.5和≥2.67。
该研究纳入了316例患者(平均±标准差年龄:48.1±14.1岁;男性占60.8%;糖尿病患者占10.1%;肥胖患者占37.1%;乙肝患者占14.2%;丙肝患者占6.7%;有饮酒史的患者占25.6%)。APRI与FibroScan之间的Pearson相关性为r = 0.210(p < 0.001),而FIB-4与FibroScan之间的相关性更好(r = 0.478,p < 0.001)。在亚组分析中,FIB-4仅在有饮酒史、乙肝或丙肝的患者中与FibroScan相关,APRI仅在酒精依赖患者中与FibroScan相关。APRI的敏感性和特异性分别为29.7%和97.9%,而FibroScan的敏感性和特异性分别为60.0%和93.3%。APRI的ROC曲线下面积为0.8462,FIB-4的ROC曲线下面积为0.8312,其阈值低于文献报道:APRI为0.422,FIB-4为1.285,但这些阈值因亚组而异。
在该人群中,APRI和FIB-4评分诊断肝硬化的特异性高但敏感性低。它们在酒精性肝病或病毒性肝炎患者中的诊断性能明显更好,但在糖尿病或肥胖患者中较差。