Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T1P5, Canada.
Curr Oncol. 2021 May 29;28(3):2065-2078. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28030191.
While adjuvant treatment of colon cancers that penetrate the serosa (T4) have been well-established, neoadjuvant strategies have yet to be formally evaluated. Our objective was to perform a scoping review of eligibility criteria, treatment regimens, and primary outcomes for neoadjuvant approaches to T4 colon cancer. A librarian-led, systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL up to 11 February 2020 was performed. Primary research evaluating neoadjuvant treatment in T4 colon cancer were included. Screening and data abstraction were performed in duplicate; analyses were descriptive or thematic. A total of twenty studies were included, most of which were single-arm, single-center, and retrospective. The primary objectives of the literature to date has been to evaluate treatment feasibility, tumor response, disease-free survival, and overall survival in healthy patients. Conventional XELOX and FOLFOX chemotherapy were the most commonly administered interventions. Rationale for selecting a specific regimen and for treatment eligibility criteria were poorly documented across studies. The current literature on neoadjuvant strategies for T4 colon cancer is overrepresented by single-center, retrospective studies that evaluate treatment feasibility and efficacy in healthy patients. Future studies should prioritize evaluating clear selection criteria and rationale for specific neoadjuvant strategies. Validation of outcomes in multi-center, randomized trials for XELOX and FOLFOX have the most to contribute to the growing evidence for this poorly managed disease.
虽然已经确立了对穿透浆膜(T4)的结肠癌进行辅助治疗的方法,但新辅助策略尚未经过正式评估。我们的目的是对 T4 结肠癌的新辅助方法的纳入标准、治疗方案和主要结果进行范围综述。在 2020 年 2 月 11 日之前,由图书馆员主导,对 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 CINAHL 进行了系统检索。纳入了评估 T4 结肠癌新辅助治疗的原始研究。筛选和数据提取均由两人进行;分析是描述性或主题性的。共纳入了 20 项研究,其中大多数为单臂、单中心和回顾性研究。迄今为止,文献的主要目标是评估健康患者中治疗的可行性、肿瘤反应、无病生存率和总生存率。常规 XELOX 和 FOLFOX 化疗是最常使用的干预措施。选择特定方案和治疗纳入标准的理由在不同的研究中记录不佳。目前关于 T4 结肠癌新辅助策略的文献主要是单中心、回顾性研究,评估健康患者的治疗可行性和疗效。未来的研究应优先评估明确的选择标准和特定新辅助策略的理由。XELOX 和 FOLFOX 的多中心、随机试验对结局的验证对这种管理不善的疾病的证据增长最有贡献。