Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Colorectal Surgery Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;36(10):2063-2070. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03945-3. Epub 2021 May 4.
There is increasing evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in locally advanced colon cancer (LACC). However, its safety, efficacy and side effect profile is yet to be completely elucidated. This review aims to assess NAC regimens, duration, compare completion rates, intra-operative and post-operative complication profiles and oncological outcomes, in order to provide guidance for clinical practice and further research.
PubMed, EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched for a systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2020. Eight eligible studies were included, with a total of 1213 patients, 752 (62%) of whom received NAC. Of the eight studies analysed, two were randomised controlled trials comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by oncological resection to upfront surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, three were prospective single-arm phase II trials analysing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery only, one was a retrospective study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery first followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and the remaining two were single-arm retrospective studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.
All cases of LACC were determined and staged by computed tomography; majority of the studies defined LACC as T3 with extramural depth of 5 mm or more, T4 and/or nodal positivity. NAC administered was either folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) with the exception of one study which utilised 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin. Most studies had NAC completion rates of above 83% with two notable exceptions being Zhou et al. and The Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy Study Group of Japan who both recorded a completion rate of 52%. Time to surgery from completion of NAC ranged on average from 16 to 31 days. The anastomotic leak rate in the NAC group ranged from 0 to 4.5%, with no cases of postoperative mortality. The R0 resection rate in the NAC group was 96.1%. Meta-analysis of both RCTs included in this study showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased the likelihood of a negative resection margin T3/4 advanced colon cancer (pooled relative risk of 0.47 with a 95% confidence interval) with no increase in adverse consequence of anastomotic leak, wound infection or return to theatre.
Our systematic review and meta-analysis show that NAC is safe with an acceptable side effect profile in the management of LACC. The current data supports an oncological benefit for tumour downstaging and increased in R0 resection rate.
越来越多的证据支持在局部晚期结肠癌(LACC)中使用新辅助化疗(NAC)。然而,其安全性、疗效和副作用仍有待完全阐明。本综述旨在评估 NAC 方案、持续时间、比较完成率、术中及术后并发症谱和肿瘤学结局,为临床实践和进一步研究提供指导。
从 2000 年至 2020 年,我们在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 MEDLINE 上进行了系统文献检索。纳入了 8 项符合条件的研究,共纳入 1213 例患者,其中 752 例(62%)接受了 NAC。在分析的 8 项研究中,有 2 项为比较新辅助化疗联合肿瘤切除术与直接手术和辅助化疗的随机对照试验,3 项为分析单纯新辅助化疗联合手术的前瞻性单臂 II 期试验,1 项为比较新辅助化疗联合手术与手术联合辅助化疗的回顾性研究,其余 2 项为新辅助化疗联合手术的单臂回顾性研究。
所有 LACC 病例均通过计算机断层扫描确定和分期;大多数研究将 LACC 定义为 T3 伴外膜深度 5mm 或以上、T4 和/或淋巴结阳性。NAC 方案为氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和奥沙利铂(FOLFOX)或卡培他滨和奥沙利铂(XELOX),除了一项研究使用氟尿嘧啶和丝裂霉素。大多数研究的 NAC 完成率高于 83%,但有两项研究例外,即 Zhou 等人和日本结直肠癌化疗研究组,其 NAC 完成率分别为 52%和 52%。从 NAC 完成到手术的时间平均为 16 至 31 天。NAC 组吻合口漏发生率为 0 至 4.5%,无术后死亡病例。NAC 组的 R0 切除率为 96.1%。本研究纳入的两项 RCT 的荟萃分析显示,新辅助化疗增加了 T3/4 期晚期结肠癌阴性切缘的可能性(合并相对风险 0.47,95%置信区间),吻合口漏、伤口感染或再次手术的不良后果没有增加。
我们的系统评价和荟萃分析表明,NAC 在 LACC 治疗中是安全的,具有可接受的副作用谱。目前的数据支持肿瘤降期和 R0 切除率增加的肿瘤学获益。