Macera Margherita, Calò Federica, Onorato Lorenzo, Di Caprio Giovanni, Monari Caterina, Russo Antonio, Galdieri Anna, Giordano Antonio, Cuccaro Patrizia, Coppola Nicola
Department of Mental Health and Public Medicine. University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 81100 Caserta, Italy.
Infectious Diseases Unit, AORN Sant'Anna and San Sebastiano, Caserta Hospital, 81100 Caserta, Italy.
Life (Basel). 2021 May 24;11(6):475. doi: 10.3390/life11060475.
The objectives of the present study were to provide a snapshot analysis of antibiotic appropriateness in two hospitals in Southern Italy in three specific areas, surgical, medical and intensive care, and to evaluate the risk factors associated with inappropriateness in antimicrobial prescriptions. We conducted a multicentre observational study in two hospitals in the Campania region. We collected data of all patients admitted on the day of evaluation to antibiotic therapy or prophylaxis through a case report form. The primary outcome was to assess the inappropriateness of antibiotic prescribing, related to the spectrum, dose, route of administration and duration of treatment-in particular, to assess whether there was a difference in the adequacy of the prescriptive practice in the medical, surgical and intensive sectors. Prescriptive inappropriateness was more frequently observed in surgical units (79.8% of the 104 antimicrobial prescriptions) than in medical units (53.8% of the 65 prescriptions, = 0.0003) or in intensive care units (64.1% of the 39 prescriptions, = 0.052). The reasons for the inappropriate antimicrobial prescriptions were similar in the three areas evaluated: antimicrobial unnecessary and antimicrobial not recommended were the most frequent reasons for inappropriateness. Not participating in an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) was identified as a factor associated with inappropriate antimicrobial prescriptions in medical and surgical units, but not in Intensive Care Units (ICUs). ASPs may enhance the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescriptions especially in medical and surgical units. In ICUs, specific programs able to limit empirical therapies and encourage the collection of microbiological samples may be useful to set up targeted therapies and to design antimicrobial protocols.
本研究的目的是对意大利南部两家医院外科、内科和重症监护三个特定领域的抗生素使用合理性进行简要分析,并评估抗菌药物处方不合理的相关风险因素。我们在坎帕尼亚地区的两家医院开展了一项多中心观察性研究。通过病例报告表收集了评估当天所有接受抗生素治疗或预防的患者的数据。主要结果是评估抗生素处方的不合理性,涉及抗菌谱、剂量、给药途径和治疗持续时间,特别是评估内科、外科和重症监护部门的处方实践合理性是否存在差异。手术科室的处方不合理情况比内科科室(65张处方中的53.8%,P = 0.0003)或重症监护病房(39张处方中的64.1%,P = 0.052)更为常见(104张抗菌药物处方中的79.8%)。在评估的三个领域中,抗菌药物处方不合理的原因相似:抗菌药物不必要和不推荐使用是最常见的不合理原因。未参与抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)被确定为内科和外科科室抗菌药物处方不合理的相关因素,但在重症监护病房(ICU)并非如此。抗菌药物管理计划可能会提高抗菌药物处方的合理性,尤其是在内科和外科科室。在重症监护病房,能够限制经验性治疗并鼓励采集微生物样本的特定计划可能有助于制定针对性治疗方案和设计抗菌药物使用规范。