• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童牙医学中局部麻醉注射时的疼痛感知。

Pain perception during injection of local anesthesia in pedodontics.

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2021 Jul 20;52(8):706-712. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b1492035.

DOI:10.3290/j.qi.b1492035
PMID:34076376
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have examined pain levels for the injection of local anesthesia in children, though it is a routine technique in pediatric dentistry. The objective of the study was to evaluate the difference in the assessment of procedural pain by the child, parent, dental practitioner, and independent observers during injection of local anesthesia for dental treatment in pediatric dentistry.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

In total, 27 male and 22 female children (5 to 17 years of age, mean ± SD 9.8 ± 4.0 years) received local anesthesia (LA) via infiltration or mandibular alveolar blocks according to a standard protocol. After the dental treatment, the children assessed the pain levels for the procedures on a visual analog scale (VAS), while their parents and the dental practitioner used a numeric rating scale (0 to 10). Independent observers also assessed pain via video tape for an evaluation after blinding. The heart rate was monitored continuously during the procedure. The Bland-Altman method was used to quantify the comparison between pain ratings.

RESULTS

The assessed level of pain by dental practitioner, parent, and child during injection of LA differed clearly (child: 3.94 ± 2.71; parent: 3.31 ± 2.60; dental practitioner: 3.02 ± 1.98; video observer 1: 1.76 ± 2.56; video observer 2: 1.89 ± 2.55). In 42.9% of cases the dental practitioner's rating and the self--reported pain by the child during injection of LA differed by ≥ 2 on the numeric rating scale, which is clinically a highly different and relevant assessment.

CONCLUSION

As pain perception in children during the injection of local anesthetic and its assessment varies considerably depending on the assessing person and the treated child, dental practitioners and researchers should be cautious in interpreting the patient's pain perception.

摘要

目的

尽管局部麻醉注射在儿童牙科中是一种常规技术,但很少有研究检查儿童注射局部麻醉的疼痛水平。本研究的目的是评估在儿童牙科中进行牙科治疗时,儿童、家长、牙医和独立观察者在注射局部麻醉时评估操作疼痛的差异。

方法和材料

共有 27 名男性和 22 名女性儿童(5 至 17 岁,平均 ± SD 9.8 ± 4.0 岁)根据标准方案通过浸润或下颌牙槽骨阻滞接受局部麻醉(LA)。在牙科治疗后,儿童使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估程序疼痛水平,而其父母和牙医使用数字评分量表(0 至 10)。独立观察者还通过录像评估疼痛,然后进行盲法评估。在整个过程中连续监测心率。使用 Bland-Altman 方法来量化疼痛评分之间的比较。

结果

牙医、家长和儿童在注射 LA 期间评估的疼痛水平明显不同(儿童:3.94 ± 2.71;家长:3.31 ± 2.60;牙医:3.02 ± 1.98;视频观察者 1:1.76 ± 2.56;视频观察者 2:1.89 ± 2.55)。在 42.9%的情况下,牙医的评分和儿童在注射 LA 期间自我报告的疼痛程度在数字评分量表上相差≥2,这在临床上是一种高度不同且相关的评估。

结论

由于儿童在接受局部麻醉注射时的疼痛感知以及评估因人而异,且与接受治疗的儿童有关,因此牙医和研究人员在解释患者的疼痛感知时应谨慎。

相似文献

1
Pain perception during injection of local anesthesia in pedodontics.儿童牙医学中局部麻醉注射时的疼痛感知。
Quintessence Int. 2021 Jul 20;52(8):706-712. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b1492035.
2
Pain Perception: Computerized versus Traditional Local Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients.疼痛感知:儿科患者中计算机化局部麻醉与传统局部麻醉的比较
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Fall;39(5):470-4. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.5.470.
3
Evaluation of the effectiveness of photobiomodulation therapy as an alternative method to local anesthesia injection in pediatric dentistry.评价光生物调节疗法作为一种替代局部麻醉注射的方法在儿童牙科中的有效性。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2023 Jul-Sep;41(3):222-227. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_305_23.
4
Evaluation of the Injection Pain with the Use of Vibraject during Local Anesthesia Injection for Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.评价使用 Vibraject 在儿童局部麻醉注射时的注射疼痛:一项随机临床试验。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Jul 1;23(7):749-754.
5
Evaluation of effect of warm local anesthetics on pain perception during dental injections in children: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.评价局部温热麻醉剂对儿童牙内注射疼痛感知的影响:一项分侧随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jul;24(7):2315-2319. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03086-6. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
6
Levels of Stress among General Practitioners, Students and Specialists In Pediatric Dentistry during Dental Treatment.儿科牙科全科医生、学生和专科医生在牙科治疗期间的压力水平。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Fall;39(5):419-22. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.5.419.
7
Local anesthesia with SleeperOne S4 computerized device traditional syringe and perceived pain in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial.SleeperOne S4 电脑控制仪局部麻醉与传统注射器在小儿患者中的应用:一项随机临床试验。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Jan;47(1):82-90. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.002. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
8
Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial.计算机控制与传统牙科麻醉后疼痛感知的比较:随机对照试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Sep 22;22(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02454-1.
9
Comparison of the pain perception in children using comfort control syringe and a conventional injection technique during pediatric dental procedures.儿童牙科治疗过程中使用舒适控制注射器和传统注射技术时儿童疼痛感知的比较。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Oct-Dec;30(4):323-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.108931.
10
Intraoperative local anaesthesia for reduction of postoperative pain following general anaesthesia for dental treatment in children and adolescents.术中局部麻醉以减轻儿童和青少年牙科治疗全身麻醉后的术后疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 23;2014(12):CD009742. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009742.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Intraosseous and Conventional Dental Anesthesia in Children-A Scoping Review.儿童骨内与传统牙科麻醉的比较——一项范围综述
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul 18;13(7):326. doi: 10.3390/dj13070326.
2
Provider perspectives on pain management practices and needs in pediatric dentistry.医疗机构对儿童牙科疼痛管理实践和需求的看法。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2023 Dec;154(12):1067-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
3
Evaluation of Intraligamentous and Intraosseous Computer-Controlled Anesthetic Delivery Systems in Pediatric Dentistry: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
小儿牙科中韧带内和骨内计算机控制麻醉给药系统的评估:一项随机对照试验。
Children (Basel). 2022 Dec 30;10(1):79. doi: 10.3390/children10010079.