Suppr超能文献

对比研究左半结肠癌全腹腔镜根治术中重叠吻合法与传统吻合法的效果。

Comparative study of Overlap anastomosis and traditional anastomosis in total laparoscopic radical resection of left colon cancer.

机构信息

Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, Wuhu No.1 People's Hospital, Anhui 241000, P.R. China.

出版信息

J BUON. 2021 Mar-Apr;26(2):521-527.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the safety and feasibility of using linear stapler to complete the side-to-side anastomosis (Overlap method) of distal and proximal colon on taenia coli along the long axis of the intestine in laparoscopic radical resection of left colon cancer.

METHODS

From January 2017 to December 2019, the clinical data of 24 patients with total laparoscopic radical resection of left colon cancer and Overlap anastomosis in the general surgery department of Wuhu First People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed (research group, RG). In addition, 36 patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of left colon cancer during the same period and whose intestinal tubes were removed from the abdominal wall to complete specimen resection and intestinal anastomosis through auxiliary incision were used as controls (control group, CG). The advantages and disadvantages of the two surgical methods were compared through the research indexes during and after the operation.

RESULTS

Compared with CG, the total operation time of the patients in RG was shortened (p<0.001), the intraoperative blood loss was less (p<0.001), the abdominal wall incision length was shorter (p<0.001) and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter (p=0.014). There was no significant difference between RG and CG in the number of lymph node dissection, the time of first postoperative anal exhaust and the incidence of postoperative complications (all p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The Overlap anastomosis technique of total laparoscopic radical resection of left colon cancer is feasible and easy to perform. It has the advantages of low incidence of complications, better cosmetic effect and short hospital stay. Although further prospective randomized studies are needed to determine its effects and limitations, it is still recommended that this operation can be popularized in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

探讨在腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术中利用直线吻合器行沿结肠带侧侧吻合(重叠法)的安全性和可行性。

方法

回顾性分析 2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月我院普外科 24 例行腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术并采用重叠吻合的患者(研究组,RG)的临床资料,同时选取同期行腹腔镜辅助左半结肠癌根治术并经辅助切口取出肠管完成标本切除和肠吻合的 36 例患者作为对照(对照组,CG)。通过围手术期的研究指标比较两种手术方式的优缺点。

结果

与 CG 相比,RG 组患者的总手术时间更短(p<0.001),术中出血量更少(p<0.001),腹壁切口长度更短(p<0.001),术后住院时间更短(p=0.014)。RG 组与 CG 组在淋巴结清扫数目、术后首次肛门排气时间及术后并发症发生率方面差异均无统计学意义(均 p>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术的重叠吻合技术是可行且易于操作的,具有并发症发生率低、美容效果好、住院时间短等优点。尽管需要进一步的前瞻性随机研究来确定其效果和局限性,但仍建议该手术可在临床实践中推广。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验