Sport and Exercise Science Research Centre, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK.
Science of Motion, Institute of Sports Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2022 Aug;22(8):1188-1195. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1938691. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
This study aimed to investigate the role of trunk posture in running locomotion. Twelve recreational runners ran in the laboratory across even and uneven ground surface (expected 10 cm drop-step) with three trunk-lean angles from the vertical (self-selected, ∼15°; anterior, ∼25°; posterior, ∼0°) while 3D kinematic and kinetic data were collected using a 3D motion-capture-system and two embedded force-plates. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs ( = 0.05) compared lower-limb joint mechanics (angles, moments, energy absorption and generation) and ground-reaction-force parameters (braking and propulsive impulse) between (level and drop) and conditions. The -by- interaction revealed decreased hip energy generation, and greater peak knee extension moment in the drop-step during running with posterior versus anterior trunk-lean. Furthermore, energy absorption across hip and ankle nearly doubled in the drop-step across all running conditions. The main effect revealed that the knee and ankle energy absorption, ankle energy generation, ground-reaction-force, and braking impulse significantly increased in the drop-step. The main effect revealed that, compared with a self-selected trunk-lean, the knee's energy absorption/generation, ankle's energy generation and the braking impulse were either retained or attenuated when leaning the trunk anteriorly. The opposite effects occurred with a posterior trunk-lean. In conclusion, while the pronounced mechanical ankle stress in drop-steps is marginally affected by posture, changing the trunk-lean reorganizes the load distribution across the knee and hip joints. Leaning the trunk anteriorly in running shifts loading from the knee to the hip not only in level running but also when coping with ground-level changes.Changing the trunk-lean when running reorganizes the load distribution across the knee and hip joints.Leaning the trunk anteriorly from a habitual trunk posture during running attenuates the mechanical stress on the knee, while the opposite effect occurs with a posterior trunk-lean, irrespective to the ground surface uniformity.The effect of posture on pronounced mechanical ankle stress in small perturbation height during running is marginal.Leaning the trunk anteriorly shifts loading from the knee to the hip not only in level running but also when coping with small perturbation height.
本研究旨在探讨躯干姿势在跑步运动中的作用。12 名休闲跑者在实验室中以三种躯干前倾角度(自我选择,约 15°;前倾,约 25°;后倾,约 0°)在水平和不平整地面(预计 10 cm 落差)上跑步,同时使用三维运动捕捉系统和两个嵌入式测力板收集三维运动学和动力学数据。使用双向重复测量方差分析( = 0.05)比较下肢关节力学(角度、力矩、能量吸收和产生)和地面反作用力参数(制动和推进冲量)在 (水平和落差)和 条件之间的差异。-by- 交互作用揭示了在跑步时,与前倾相比,后倾躯干姿势会导致髋关节能量产生减少和膝关节伸展峰值力矩增加。此外,在所有跑步条件下,在落差阶段,髋关节和踝关节的能量吸收几乎增加了一倍。主效应揭示了在落差阶段,膝关节和踝关节的能量吸收/产生、踝关节的能量产生、地面反作用力和制动冲量显著增加。主效应揭示了与自我选择的躯干前倾相比,当躯干前倾时,膝关节的能量吸收/产生、踝关节的能量产生和制动冲量保持或减弱。相反的效果发生在躯干后倾时。总之,虽然在落差阶段明显的踝关节力学应力受姿势影响较小,但改变躯干姿势会重新分配膝关节和髋关节的负荷分布。在跑步时,躯干前倾会将负荷从膝关节转移到髋关节,不仅在水平跑步时如此,而且在应对地面高度变化时也是如此。在跑步时改变躯干姿势会重新分配膝关节和髋关节的负荷分布。与习惯性躯干姿势相比,跑步时躯干前倾会减轻膝关节的机械应力,而相反的效果则发生在躯干后倾时,无论地面是否平整。在跑步时,较小的微扰高度对明显的机械踝关节应力的影响较小。在水平跑步时以及应对较小的微扰高度时,躯干前倾会将负荷从膝关节转移到髋关节。