• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

圈套尖端喷雾凝固术与氩离子凝固术的比较:一项评估组织效应的离体研究

Spray coagulation with snare-tip versus argon plasma coagulation: An ex vivo study evaluating tissue effects.

作者信息

Fetz Andrew, Farnell David, Irani Shayan, Gan S Ian

机构信息

Gastroenterology Department, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Pathology Department, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2021 Jun;9(6):E790-E795. doi: 10.1055/a-1373-4162. Epub 2021 May 27.

DOI:10.1055/a-1373-4162
PMID:34079859
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8159595/
Abstract

Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is an effective and safe modality for many gastrointestinal conditions requiring hemostasis and/or ablation. However, it can be quite costly. A potentially more cost-effective alternative is snare-tip spray coagulation (SC). This study aimed to determine whether SC would be a safe and effective alternative to APC using an ex-vivo model. Using two resected porcine stomach, 36 randomized gastric areas were ablated for 2 seconds with either APC at 1.0 L/min 20 W (APC20) and 1.4 L/min 40 W (APC40) or SC with Effect 2 60 W (SC60) and 80 W (SC80) from 3 mm. Extent of tissue injury was then analyzed histopathologically. The mean coagulation depth was 790 ± 159 µm and 825 ± 467 µm for SC60 (n = 9) and SC80 (n = 8), respectively. This was compared to 539 ± 151 µm for APC20 (n = 8) and 779 ± 267 µm for APC40 (n = 9). Mean difference (MD) in coagulation depth between SC60 and APC40 was 12 µm (95 % confidence interval [CI], -191 to 214 µm;  = 0.91) and was 47 µm (95 %CI, -162 to 255 µm;  = 0.81) between SC80 and APC40. There was a greater depth of injury with APC40 (MD, 240 µm; 95 %CI, 62 to 418 µm;  = 0.04) and with SC60 (MD, 252 µm; 95 %CI, 141 to 362 µm;  = 0.004) when compared to APC20. Mean cross-sectional area of coagulation was 2.39 ± 0.852 mm² for SC60 and 2.54 ± 1.83 mm² for SC80 compared to 1.22 ± 0.569 mm² for APC20 and 1.99 ± 0.769 mm² for APC40. Seventy-eight percent reached the muscularis mucosa (MM) and 11 % the submucosa in the SC60 group compared to 50 % and 38 % in SC80 and 56 % and 11 % in APC40, respectively. Thirty-eight percent of APC20 specimens reached the MM. The muscularis propria was unaffected. This small ex-vivo study suggests that SC60 and SC80 may be safe alternatives to APC40 with comparable coagulation depths and area effects.

摘要

氩等离子体凝固术(APC)是一种用于许多需要止血和/或消融的胃肠道疾病的有效且安全的治疗方式。然而,其成本可能相当高。一种潜在更具成本效益的替代方法是圈套器顶端喷雾凝固术(SC)。本研究旨在使用离体模型确定SC是否是APC的一种安全有效的替代方法。使用两个切除的猪胃,将36个随机选择的胃区域分别用1.0升/分钟20瓦的APC(APC20)、1.4升/分钟40瓦的APC(APC40)、60瓦的Effect 2的SC(SC60)以及80瓦的Effect 2的SC(SC80)从3毫米处进行2秒的消融。然后对组织损伤程度进行组织病理学分析。SC60组(n = 9)和SC80组(n = 8)的平均凝固深度分别为790±159微米和825±467微米。与之相比,APC20组(n = 8)为539±151微米,APC40组(n = 9)为779±267微米。SC60与APC40之间凝固深度的平均差值(MD)为12微米(95%置信区间[CI],-191至214微米;P = 0.91),SC80与APC40之间为47微米(95%CI,-162至255微米;P = 0.81)。与APC20相比,APC40(MD,240微米;95%CI,62至418微米;P = 0.04)和SC60(MD,252微米;95%CI,141至362微米;P = 0.004)造成的损伤深度更大。SC60的平均凝固横截面积为2.39±0.852平方毫米,SC80为2.54±1.83平方毫米,与之相比,APC20为1.22±

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c981/8159595/8e2c89086c8d/10-1055-a-1373-4162-i2107ei4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c981/8159595/aafaace283cd/10-1055-a-1373-4162-i2107ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c981/8159595/720f50667265/10-1055-a-1373-4162-i2107ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c981/8159595/80690ae210ff/10-1055-a-1373-4162-i2107ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c981/8159595/8e2c89086c8d/10-1055-a-1373-4162-i2107ei4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c981/8159595/aafaace283cd/10-1055-a-1373-4162-i2107ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c981/8159595/720f50667265/10-1055-a-1373-4162-i2107ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c981/8159595/80690ae210ff/10-1055-a-1373-4162-i2107ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c981/8159595/8e2c89086c8d/10-1055-a-1373-4162-i2107ei4.jpg

相似文献

1
Spray coagulation with snare-tip versus argon plasma coagulation: An ex vivo study evaluating tissue effects.圈套尖端喷雾凝固术与氩离子凝固术的比较:一项评估组织效应的离体研究
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Jun;9(6):E790-E795. doi: 10.1055/a-1373-4162. Epub 2021 May 27.
2
The tissue effect of argon-plasma coagulation with prior submucosal injection (Hybrid-APC) versus standard APC: A randomized ex-vivo study.氩等离子凝固术联合黏膜下注射(Hybrid-APC)与标准 APC 治疗的组织学效果比较:一项随机离体研究。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2014 Oct;2(5):383-90. doi: 10.1177/2050640614544315.
3
Effects of argon plasma coagulation on human stomach tissue: An ex vivo study.氩等离子体凝固对人胃组织的影响:一项离体研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 May;32(5):1040-1045. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13636.
4
Histological findings after argon plasma coagulation: an ex-vivo study revealing a possible role in superficial ablative treatment of the skin.氩等离子体凝固后的组织学发现:一项揭示其在皮肤表面消融治疗中可能作用的离体研究。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2018 Mar;310(2):157-163. doi: 10.1007/s00403-018-1810-3. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
5
In vivo evaluation of argon plasma coagulation in a porcine model.氩等离子体凝固术在猪模型中的体内评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Mar;65(3):457-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.09.005.
6
Investigation of the thermal tissue effects of the argon plasma coagulation modes "pulsed" and "precise" on the porcine esophagus, ex vivo and in vivo.对氩等离子体凝固模式“脉冲式”和“精确式”在离体和在体猪食管上的热组织效应的研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Aug;70(2):362-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.050. Epub 2009 Jun 5.
7
Histology assessment of bipolar coagulation and argon plasma coagulation on digestive tract.消化道双极电凝术和氩离子凝固术的组织学评估
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jul 16;6(7):304-11. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i7.304.
8
Gastric mucosal devitalization (GMD): translation to a novel endoscopic metabolic therapy.胃黏膜失活(GMD):向一种新型内镜代谢疗法的转变。
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Dec;7(12):E1640-E1645. doi: 10.1055/a-0957-3067. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
9
Argon plasma coagulation (APC) for endo-urological procedures: ex-vivo evaluations of hemostatic properties.用于腔内泌尿外科手术的氩等离子体凝固术(APC):止血特性的体外评估
Eur Urol. 2003 Aug;44(2):272-6. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00209-4.
10
Ablation of residual gastric tumor by argon plasma coagulation after endoscopic resection.内镜切除术后氩离子凝固术治疗残留胃肿瘤
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1093-1100. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5069-5. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel treatment for radiation proctopathy using monopolar spray coagulation with a polypectomy snare tip.一种使用带息肉切除圈套器尖端的单极喷雾凝固术治疗放射性直肠炎的新方法。
Endoscopy. 2025 Dec;57(S 01):E519-E520. doi: 10.1055/a-2598-4404. Epub 2025 May 28.
2
Endoscopic duodenal mucosal ablation via spray coagulation technique for duodenal mucosal resurfacing in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (with video).通过喷雾凝固技术进行内镜下十二指肠黏膜消融术用于2型糖尿病患者的十二指肠黏膜重塑(附视频)
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct;43(5):1065-1067. doi: 10.1007/s12664-024-01640-z.
3
Development and application of a spray tip that enables electrocoagulation of a variety of tissues.

本文引用的文献

1
Gastrointestinal: Spray coagulation with snare tip as a rescue therapy to argon plasma coagulation for bleeding jejunal angioectasia.胃肠道:使用圈套器尖端进行喷雾凝固作为氩离子凝固术治疗空肠血管扩张出血的挽救疗法。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;32(12):1909. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13827.
2
Long-term results on the efficacy of argon plasma coagulation for patients with chronic radiation proctitis after conventionally fractionated, dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.常规分割、剂量递增放疗治疗前列腺癌后慢性放射性直肠炎患者行氩离子血浆凝固治疗的疗效的长期结果。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan-Feb;7(1):e35-e42. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
3
一种能够对多种组织进行电凝的喷雾头的开发与应用。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 25;9(8):e17771. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17771. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Argon plasma coagulation in the right and left colon: safety-risk profile of the 60W-1.2 l/min setting.
左右结肠的氩等离子体凝固术:60W - 1.2升/分钟设置的安全风险概况
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 May;49(5):632-41. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.903510. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
4
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for removal of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms: A technical review.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗浅表性胃肠道肿瘤:技术综述
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Apr 16;4(4):123-36. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i4.123.
5
In vivo evaluation of argon plasma coagulation in a porcine model.氩等离子体凝固术在猪模型中的体内评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Mar;65(3):457-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.09.005.
6
Clinical applications of the argon plasma coagulator.氩等离子体凝固器的临床应用
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jan;59(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02296-x.
7
In vivo characterization of colonic thermal injury caused by argon plasma coagulation.氩等离子体凝固所致结肠热损伤的体内特征
Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 May;55(6):631-6. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.123418.
8
Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations.氩等离子体凝固术治疗可降低大肠广基息肉分块切除术后的复发率:一项随机试验及建议
Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Mar;55(3):371-5. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.121597.
9
Argon beam plasma coagulation in the management of cancers of the esophagus and stomach.
Surg Endosc. 2000 Dec;14(12):1127-30. doi: 10.1007/s004640000266.
10
The tissue effect of argon plasma coagulation on esophageal and gastric mucosa.氩离子凝固术对食管和胃黏膜的组织效应
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Sep;52(3):342-5. doi: 10.1067/mge.2000.108412.