Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127# Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd., 2258 Chengbei Road, Jiading District, Shanghai, 201807, China.
Eur Radiol. 2021 Dec;31(12):9232-9239. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08064-9. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
To determine the diagnostic performance of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) (FFR) difference across the lesion (ΔFFR) or the vessel (ΔFFR) and the gradient of FFR for the identification of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
From June 2016 to December 2018, 73 patients suspected of having coronary artery disease who underwent CCTA followed invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 1 month were retrospectively included. ΔFFR, ΔFFR, and FFR gradient were calculated. Performance characteristics of different corrected FFR metrics in detecting ischemic stenosis were analyzed. Impacts of coronary calcification and lesion length on the corrected FFR metrics were also analyzed.
The diagnostic sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies of 94.4%, 88.7%, and 91.0% with ΔFFR, 57.1%, 72.3%, and 65.2% with ΔFFR, and 50.0%, 85.1%, and 68.5% with FFR gradient, respectively, were detected. There was higher specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) for ΔFFR compared with CCTA (p < 0.05 for all). The specificity and AUC of FFR gradient and ΔFFR were significantly higher than CCTA (p < 0.05 for all). Coronary calcification showed no impact on corrected FFR metrics. ΔFFR for lesion length ratio (LLR) < 1/10 was significantly lower than that for LLR 1/10 to 3/10 and LLR > 3/10.
ΔFFR was significantly correlated with the hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis. ΔFFR had the potential to be immediately used in real-world practice to discriminate ischemic coronary artery stenosis.
• The difference of FFR across the lesion or the vessel and the gradient of FFR was related to the hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis. • The difference of FFR across the lesion showed the best diagnostic performance in detecting the hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis. • Coronary calcification showed no impact on corrected FFR metrics, while lesion length related to the difference of FFR across the lesion.
确定源自冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术(CCTA)的分流量储备(FFR)差异(ΔFFR)或血管(ΔFFR)和 FFR 梯度在识别血流动力学意义重大的冠状动脉狭窄方面的诊断性能。
回顾性纳入 2016 年 6 月至 2018 年 12 月期间 73 例疑似患有冠心病且在 1 个月内接受 CCTA 加介入冠状动脉造影(ICA)的患者。计算 ΔFFR、ΔFFR 和 FFR 梯度。分析不同校正 FFR 指标在检测缺血性狭窄方面的性能特征。还分析了冠状动脉钙化和病变长度对校正 FFR 指标的影响。
ΔFFR 的诊断灵敏度、特异度和准确度分别为 94.4%、88.7%和 91.0%,ΔFFR 分别为 57.1%、72.3%和 65.2%,FFR 梯度分别为 50.0%、85.1%和 68.5%。与 CCTA 相比,ΔFFR 的特异性、准确度和曲线下面积(AUC)更高(p < 0.05)。FFR 梯度和 ΔFFR 的特异性和 AUC 均明显高于 CCTA(p < 0.05)。冠状动脉钙化对校正 FFR 指标无影响。病变长度比(LLR)<1/10 的 ΔFFR 明显低于 LLR 1/10 至 3/10 和 LLR > 3/10。
ΔFFR 与血流动力学意义重大的冠状动脉狭窄显著相关。ΔFFR 有可能立即在实际工作中用于区分缺血性冠状动脉狭窄。
病变或血管间的 FFR 差异和 FFR 梯度与血流动力学意义重大的冠状动脉狭窄相关。
病变间的 FFR 差异在检测血流动力学意义重大的冠状动脉狭窄方面具有最佳的诊断性能。
冠状动脉钙化对校正 FFR 指标无影响,而病变长度与病变间的 FFR 差异相关。