[Gross hematuria and usefulness of urinary cytology: Experience at hematuria one stop clinic.].

OBJECTIVE

To report the diagnostic accuracy and liability of the instrumentalized urine cytology in the preliminary study of monosyntomatic gross haematuria.

METHODS

A retrospective, descriptive and analytic study of the patients that complained of macroscopic hematuria at the one-stop clinic between 2011 and 2018. The complementary tests requested were: kidney/bladder ultrasounds, urethrocystoscopy and urinary instrumentalized cytology. All the urine cytology samples were examined by the same pathologist.

RESULTS

1122 patients were reviewed with ultrasonography and cystoscopy. Bladder tumor was detected in 354 patients (31.5%) and other urological malignancies were found in 33 cases (2.9%). Urinary instrumentalized cytologies were collected in 804 patients (71.4%), being positive in 236 cases (29.4%). Sensitivity and specificity of urinary cytology for urothelial tumor detection were 55.1% and 85.7%, respectively. Cytology was positive in 181 patients (52.1%) with visible bladder tumors through cystoscopy, in 7 patients (0.87%) without visible bladder tumors. In 433 patients with ultrasonography and cystoscopy both negative, urine cytology was performed with a negative result (38.6%).

CONCLUSION

The usefulness of instrumentalized urinary cytology to diagnose urothelial tumors is restricted in terms of monosymptomatic gross haematuria one stop clinic. It allows the diagnosis of a very limited number of cases tumors and leaves a significant number of them out. In case of gross hematuria and negative imaging, urine cytology can be requested as a differed complementary.