Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 1;139(7):769-776. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.1660.
Poor adherence or persistence to treatment can be a barrier to optimizing clinical practice (real-world) outcomes to intravitreal injection therapy in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Currently, there is a lack of consensus on the definition and classification of adherence specific to this context.
To describe the development and validation of terminology on patient nonadherence and nonpersistence to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Following a systematic review of currently used terminology in the literature, a subcommittee panel of retinal experts developed a set of definitions and classification for validation. Definitions were restricted to use in patients with nAMD requiring intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Validation by the full nAMD Barometer Leadership Coalition was established using a modified Delphi approach, with predetermined mean scores of 7.5 or more signifying consensus. Subsequent endorsement of the definitions was provided from a second set of retinal experts, with more than 50% members agreeing or strongly agreeing with all definitions.
Development of consensus definitions for the terms adherence and persistence and a classification system for the factors associated with treatment nonadherence or nonpersistence in patients with nAMD.
Nonadherence was defined as missing 2 or more treatment or monitoring visits over a period of 12 months, with a visit considered missed if it exceeded more than 2 weeks from the recommended date. Nonpersistence was defined by nonattendance or an appointment not scheduled within the last 6 months. The additional terms planned discontinuation and transfer of care were also established. Reasons for treatment nonadherence and nonpersistence were classified into 6 dimensions: (1) patient associated, (2) condition associated, (3) therapy associated, (4) health system and health care team associated, (5) social/economic, and (6) other, with subcategories specific to treatment for nAMD.
This classification system provides a framework for assessing treatment nonadherence and nonpersistence over time and across different health settings in the treatment of nAMD with current intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatments. This may have additional importance, given the potential association of the coronavirus pandemic on adherence to treatment in patients with nAMD.
在患有新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)的患者中,治疗依从性或持久性差可能是优化玻璃体腔内注射治疗的临床实践(真实世界)结局的障碍。目前,针对这一特定情况,尚无关于治疗依从性和持久性的定义和分类的共识。
描述抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的患者不依从和不持续治疗相关术语的制定和验证。
设计、设置和参与者:在对文献中当前使用的术语进行系统回顾后,一组视网膜专家小组委员会制定了一套定义和分类进行验证。这些定义仅限于需要接受玻璃体腔内抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的 nAMD 患者使用。使用改良 Delphi 方法由 nAMD 晴雨表领导联盟全体成员进行验证,预定平均得分为 7.5 或更高表示达成共识。随后,另一组视网膜专家对这些定义表示认可,超过 50%的成员同意或强烈同意所有定义。
制定了 nAMD 患者治疗依从性和持久性的术语共识定义和治疗不依从或不持续相关因素的分类系统。
不依从被定义为在 12 个月的时间内错过 2 次或更多次治疗或监测就诊,就诊时间超过推荐日期超过 2 周的被视为错过就诊。不持续被定义为未就诊或在过去 6 个月内未预约就诊。还确定了“计划停药”和“转院”这两个附加术语。治疗不依从和不持续的原因分为 6 个维度:(1)患者相关,(2)疾病相关,(3)治疗相关,(4)医疗系统和医疗团队相关,(5)社会/经济相关,以及(6)其他相关,每个维度都有针对 nAMD 治疗的具体分类。
该分类系统提供了一个框架,可用于评估 nAMD 患者接受当前玻璃体腔内抗血管内皮生长因子治疗时,随时间推移和在不同医疗环境下的治疗不依从和不持续情况。鉴于冠状病毒大流行可能对 nAMD 患者的治疗依从性产生影响,该分类系统可能具有额外的重要性。