• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。

The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.

机构信息

Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, Directorate I - Competences, Unit I.1 - Monitoring, Indicators and Impact Evaluation, Ispra (VA), Italy.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.

DOI:10.2196/27892
PMID:34081602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8382155/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contact tracing apps are considered useful means to monitor SARS-CoV-2 infections during the off-peak stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Their effectiveness is, however, dependent on the uptake of such COVID-19 apps.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the role of individuals' general health status in their willingness to use a COVID-19 tracing app as well as the roles of socioeconomic characteristics and COVID-19 proximity.

METHODS

We drew data from the WageIndicator Foundation Living and Working in Coronavirus Times survey. The survey collected data on labor market status as well as the potential confounders of the relationship between general health and COVID-19 tracing app usage, such as sociodemographics and regular smartphone usage data. The survey also contained information that allowed us to examine the role of COVID-19 proximity, such as whether an individual has contracted SARS-CoV-2, whether an individual has family members and colleagues with COVID-19, and whether an individual exhibits COVID-19 pandemic-induced depressive and anxiety symptoms. We selected data that were collected in Spain, Italy, Germany, and the Netherlands from individuals aged between 18 and 70 years (N=4504). Logistic regressions were used to measure individuals' willingness to use a COVID-19 tracing app.

RESULTS

We found that the influence that socioeconomic factors have on COVID-19 tracing app usage varied dramatically between the four countries, although individuals experiencing forms of not being employed (ie, recent job loss and inactivity) consistently had a lower willingness to use a contact tracing app (effect size: 24.6%) compared to that of employees (effect size: 33.4%; P<.001). Among the selected COVID-19 proximity indicators, having a close family member with SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with higher contact tracing app usage (effect size: 36.3% vs 27.1%; P<.001). After accounting for these proximity factors and the country-based variations therein, we found that having a poorer general health status was significantly associated with a much higher likelihood of contact tracing app usage; compared to a self-reported "very good" health status (estimated probability of contact tracing app use: 29.6%), the "good" (estimated probability: +4.6%; 95% CI 1.2%-8.1%) and "fair or bad" (estimated probability: +6.3%; 95% CI 2.3%-10.3%) health statuses were associated with a markedly higher willingness to use a COVID-19 tracing app.

CONCLUSIONS

Current public health policies aim to promote the use of smartphone-based contact tracing apps during the off-peak periods of the COVID-19 pandemic. Campaigns that emphasize the health benefits of COVID-19 tracing apps may contribute the most to the uptake of such apps. Public health campaigns that rely on digital platforms would also benefit from seriously considering the country-specific distribution of privacy concerns.

摘要

背景

接触追踪应用程序被认为是监测 COVID-19 大流行非高峰期 SARS-CoV-2 感染的有用手段。然而,它们的有效性取决于此类 COVID-19 应用程序的采用率。

目的

我们研究了个体的一般健康状况在其使用 COVID-19 追踪应用程序的意愿中的作用,以及社会经济特征和 COVID-19 接近程度的作用。

方法

我们从 WageIndicator 基金会的《冠状病毒时代的生活和工作》调查中提取了数据。该调查收集了劳动力市场状况以及一般健康状况与 COVID-19 追踪应用程序使用之间关系的潜在混杂因素的数据,例如社会人口统计学和定期使用智能手机的数据。该调查还包含了一些信息,使我们能够研究 COVID-19 接近程度的作用,例如个体是否感染了 SARS-CoV-2,个体是否有患有 COVID-19 的家庭成员和同事,以及个体是否表现出 COVID-19 大流行引起的抑郁和焦虑症状。我们选择了在西班牙、意大利、德国和荷兰收集的年龄在 18 至 70 岁之间的个人数据(N=4504)。使用逻辑回归来衡量个人使用 COVID-19 追踪应用程序的意愿。

结果

我们发现,社会经济因素对 COVID-19 追踪应用程序使用的影响在四个国家之间差异很大,尽管经历某种形式失业的个体(即最近失业和不活跃)使用接触追踪应用程序的意愿明显较低(效应量:24.6%)与雇员相比(效应量:33.4%;P<.001)。在选定的 COVID-19 接近度指标中,有密切的 SARS-CoV-2 感染的家庭成员与更高的接触追踪应用程序使用率相关(效应量:36.3%比 27.1%;P<.001)。在考虑到这些接近因素及其在各国之间的差异后,我们发现,一般健康状况较差与接触追踪应用程序使用率显著较高显著相关;与自我报告的“非常好”健康状况(接触追踪应用程序使用的估计概率:29.6%)相比,“良好”(估计概率:+4.6%;95%CI 1.2%-8.1%)和“中等或差”(估计概率:+6.3%;95%CI 2.3%-10.3%)健康状况与使用 COVID-19 追踪应用程序的意愿明显更高。

结论

当前的公共卫生政策旨在促进在 COVID-19 大流行的非高峰期使用基于智能手机的接触追踪应用程序。强调 COVID-19 追踪应用程序健康益处的宣传活动可能对这些应用程序的采用最有帮助。依赖数字平台的公共卫生宣传活动也将受益于认真考虑特定国家/地区的隐私问题分布。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1dd/8382155/f30c1864d389/publichealth_v7i8e27892_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1dd/8382155/ed2f0994a4fc/publichealth_v7i8e27892_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1dd/8382155/f30c1864d389/publichealth_v7i8e27892_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1dd/8382155/ed2f0994a4fc/publichealth_v7i8e27892_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1dd/8382155/f30c1864d389/publichealth_v7i8e27892_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.
2
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.基于应用程序的 COVID-19 接触者追踪的可接受性:跨国调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857. doi: 10.2196/19857.
3
COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Predicted Uptake in the Netherlands Based on a Discrete Choice Experiment.COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序:基于离散选择实验预测荷兰的使用率。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 9;8(10):e20741. doi: 10.2196/20741.
4
Peer-to-Peer Contact Tracing: Development of a Privacy-Preserving Smartphone App.点对点接触追踪:隐私保护智能手机应用程序的开发。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 7;8(4):e18936. doi: 10.2196/18936.
5
Barriers to the Large-Scale Adoption of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in Germany: Survey Study.德国大规模采用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用的障碍:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 2;23(3):e23362. doi: 10.2196/23362.
6
Utilizing Health Behavior Change and Technology Acceptance Models to Predict the Adoption of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Cross-sectional Survey Study.利用健康行为改变和技术接受模型预测 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的采用:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 19;23(5):e25447. doi: 10.2196/25447.
7
Drivers of Acceptance of COVID-19 Proximity Tracing Apps in Switzerland: Panel Survey Analysis.瑞士 COVID-19 接触追踪应用接受度的驱动因素:面板调查分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 6;7(1):e25701. doi: 10.2196/25701.
8
Adoption of a Contact Tracing App for Containing COVID-19: A Health Belief Model Approach.采用接触者追踪应用程序控制 COVID-19:健康信念模型方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Sep 1;6(3):e20572. doi: 10.2196/20572.
9
Predicting Public Uptake of Digital Contact Tracing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results From a Nationwide Survey in Singapore.预测新冠疫情期间数字接触者追踪技术在公众中的应用情况:新加坡全国性调查结果
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 3;23(2):e24730. doi: 10.2196/24730.
10
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.

引用本文的文献

1
Participant Contributions to Person-Generated Health Data Research Using Mobile Devices: Scoping Review.参与者对使用移动设备进行的个人生成健康数据研究的贡献:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 20;27:e51955. doi: 10.2196/51955.
2
The Use of COVID-19 Mobile Apps in Connecting Patients with Primary Healthcare in 30 Countries: Eurodata Study.30个国家中COVID-19移动应用程序在将患者与初级医疗保健相连接方面的应用:欧洲数据研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 16;12(14):1420. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12141420.
3
Resident Willingness to Participate in Digital Contact Tracing in a COVID-19 Hotspot: Findings From a Detroit Panel Study.

本文引用的文献

1
OpenABM-Covid19-An agent-based model for non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 including contact tracing.OpenABM-Covid19-一种针对包括接触者追踪在内的 COVID-19 的非药物干预措施的基于代理的模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jul 12;17(7):e1009146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009146. eCollection 2021 Jul.
2
Mental associations with COVID-19 and how they relate with self-reported protective behaviors: A national survey in the United States.与 COVID-19 相关的心理联想及其与自我报告的保护行为的关系:美国的一项全国性调查。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Apr;275:113825. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113825. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
3
居民参与新冠疫情热点地区数字接触者追踪的意愿:来自底特律小组研究的发现。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jan 19;9:e39002. doi: 10.2196/39002.
4
Willingness to share contacts in case of COVID-19 positivity-predictors of collaboration resistance in a nation-wide Italian survey.在一项全国性的意大利调查中,针对 COVID-19 阳性病例,人们分享联系方式的意愿——合作抵制的预测因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 27;17(9):e0274902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274902. eCollection 2022.
5
Are Spaniards Happier When the Bars Are Open? Using Life Satisfaction to Evaluate COVID-19 Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs).酒吧营业时西班牙人更快乐吗?用生活满意度评估 COVID-19 非药物干预措施(NPIs)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 24;18(19):10056. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910056.
Modeling the effect of exposure notification and non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission in Washington state.
模拟暴露通知和非药物干预措施对华盛顿州新冠病毒传播的影响。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Mar 12;4(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00422-7.
4
Americans' perceptions of privacy and surveillance in the COVID-19 pandemic.美国人对 COVID-19 大流行期间隐私和监控的看法。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0242652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242652. eCollection 2020.
5
Motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online experiment.在 COVID-19 大流行期间激励社会隔离:一项在线实验。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113478. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113478. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
6
Economic hardship and mental health complaints during COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间的经济困难和心理健康问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 3;117(44):27277-27284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009609117. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
7
Do Quarantine Experiences and Attitudes Towards COVID-19 Affect the Distribution of Mental Health in China? A Quantile Regression Analysis.隔离经历及对新冠疫情的态度是否影响中国的心理健康分布?一项分位数回归分析。
Appl Res Qual Life. 2021;16(5):1925-1942. doi: 10.1007/s11482-020-09851-0. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
8
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.基于应用程序的 COVID-19 接触者追踪的可接受性:跨国调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857. doi: 10.2196/19857.
9
Can digital contact tracing make up for lost time?数字接触者追踪能否弥补失去的时间?
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e417-e418. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30160-2. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
10
Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing strategies for COVID-19: a modelling study.新冠病毒接触者追踪策略有效性延迟的影响:建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e452-e459. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30157-2. Epub 2020 Jul 16.