• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国大规模采用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用的障碍:调查研究。

Barriers to the Large-Scale Adoption of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in Germany: Survey Study.

机构信息

Collaborative Research Center 884 "Political Economy of Reforms", University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 2;23(3):e23362. doi: 10.2196/23362.

DOI:10.2196/23362
PMID:33577466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7927947/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, one way to reduce further transmissions of SARS-CoV-2 is the widespread use of contact tracing apps. Such apps keep track of proximity contacts and warn contacts of persons who tested positive for an infection.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we analyzed potential barriers to the large-scale adoption of the official contact tracing app that was introduced in Germany on June 16, 2020.

METHODS

Survey data were collected from 3276 adults during the week the app was introduced using an offline-recruited, probability-based online panel of the general adult population in Germany.

RESULTS

We estimate that 81% of the population aged 18 to 77 years possess the devices and ability to install the official app and that 35% are also willing to install and use it. Potential spreaders show high access to devices required to install the app (92%) and high ability to install the app (91%) but low willingness (31%) to correctly adopt the app, whereas for vulnerable groups, the main barrier is access (62%).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest a pessimistic view on the effectiveness of app-based contact tracing to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. We recommend targeting information campaigns at groups with a high potential to spread the virus but who are unwilling to install and correctly use the app, in particular men and those aged between 30 and 59 years. In addition, vulnerable groups, in particular older individuals and those in lower-income households, may be provided with equipment and support to overcome their barriers to app adoption.

摘要

背景

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,减少 SARS-CoV-2 进一步传播的一种方法是广泛使用接触者追踪应用程序。此类应用程序可以跟踪近距离接触者,并提醒接触者感染阳性的人。

目的

本研究分析了 2020 年 6 月 16 日在德国推出的官方接触者追踪应用程序大规模采用的潜在障碍。

方法

在该应用程序推出的一周内,使用德国普通成年人群体的离线招募、基于概率的在线面板,从 3276 名成年人中收集了调查数据。

结果

我们估计,18 至 77 岁的人群中有 81%拥有安装官方应用程序所需的设备和能力,其中 35%也愿意安装和使用该应用程序。潜在的传播者拥有很高的设备访问权限(92%)和很高的安装应用程序的能力(91%),但正确采用应用程序的意愿很低(31%),而对于弱势群体,主要障碍是访问权限(62%)。

结论

研究结果表明,基于应用程序的接触者追踪在控制 COVID-19 大流行方面效果不佳。我们建议针对具有高传播病毒潜力但不愿意安装和正确使用应用程序的人群,开展信息宣传活动,特别是男性和 30 至 59 岁的人群。此外,为了克服应用程序采用的障碍,可以为弱势群体,特别是老年人和低收入家庭的人提供设备和支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2705/7927947/7bc3885bbf33/jmir_v23i3e23362_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2705/7927947/71f05fa3008d/jmir_v23i3e23362_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2705/7927947/e5b94920234f/jmir_v23i3e23362_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2705/7927947/7bc3885bbf33/jmir_v23i3e23362_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2705/7927947/71f05fa3008d/jmir_v23i3e23362_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2705/7927947/e5b94920234f/jmir_v23i3e23362_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2705/7927947/7bc3885bbf33/jmir_v23i3e23362_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers to the Large-Scale Adoption of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in Germany: Survey Study.德国大规模采用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用的障碍:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 2;23(3):e23362. doi: 10.2196/23362.
2
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.
3
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.基于应用程序的 COVID-19 接触者追踪的可接受性:跨国调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857. doi: 10.2196/19857.
4
Sociodemographic characteristics determine download and use of a Corona contact tracing app in Germany-Results of the COSMO surveys.社会人口统计学特征决定了德国 Corona 接触者追踪应用程序的下载和使用情况——COSMO 调查结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0256660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256660. eCollection 2021.
5
Public Adoption of and Trust in the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Quantitative Online Survey Study.英国国民保健制度 (NHS) COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的公众采用和信任:定量在线调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 17;23(9):e29085. doi: 10.2196/29085.
6
Reasons for Nonuse, Discontinuation of Use, and Acceptance of Additional Functionalities of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App: Cross-sectional Survey Study.新冠接触者追踪应用程序的未使用、停用和接受额外功能的原因:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jan 14;8(1):e22113. doi: 10.2196/22113.
7
COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Predicted Uptake in the Netherlands Based on a Discrete Choice Experiment.COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序:基于离散选择实验预测荷兰的使用率。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 9;8(10):e20741. doi: 10.2196/20741.
8
Utilizing Health Behavior Change and Technology Acceptance Models to Predict the Adoption of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Cross-sectional Survey Study.利用健康行为改变和技术接受模型预测 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的采用:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 19;23(5):e25447. doi: 10.2196/25447.
9
Quality and Adoption of COVID-19 Tracing Apps and Recommendations for Development: Systematic Interdisciplinary Review of European Apps.**COVID-19 追踪应用的质量和采用情况,以及开发建议:对欧洲应用的系统跨学科审查。**
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 2;23(6):e27989. doi: 10.2196/27989.
10
Adoption of a Contact Tracing App for Containing COVID-19: A Health Belief Model Approach.采用接触者追踪应用程序控制 COVID-19:健康信念模型方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Sep 1;6(3):e20572. doi: 10.2196/20572.

引用本文的文献

1
["I hope to be informed". Effects of the Corona-Warning-App].["我希望得到通知"。新冠预警应用程序的效果]
Pravent Gesundh. 2022;17(2):128-133. doi: 10.1007/s11553-021-00854-9. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
An individual's trust in government is a major determinant in the decision to voluntarily join a public health initiative.个人对政府的信任是决定是否自愿参与公共卫生倡议的一个主要因素。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Feb 14;14(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00671-x.
3
Contextual Acceptance of COVID-19 Mitigation Mobile Apps in the United States: Mixed Methods Survey Study on Postpandemic Data Privacy.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling the effect of exposure notification and non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission in Washington state.模拟暴露通知和非药物干预措施对华盛顿州新冠病毒传播的影响。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Mar 12;4(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00422-7.
2
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
3
Mobile Health Apps That Help With COVID-19 Management: Scoping Review.
美国 COVID-19 缓解移动应用程序的使用背景:后疫情时代数据隐私的混合方法调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 29;26:e57309. doi: 10.2196/57309.
4
The epidemiological impact of digital and manual contact tracing on the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in the Netherlands: Empirical evidence.数字与人工接触者追踪对荷兰SARS-CoV-2疫情的流行病学影响:实证证据
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Dec 29;2(12):e0000396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000396. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
The French General Population's Perception of New Information and Communication Technologies for Medical Consultations: National Survey.法国民众对医疗咨询新信息和通信技术的看法:全国性调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 16;25:e45822. doi: 10.2196/45822.
6
Digital Public Health Solutions in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Analysis of Contact Tracing Solutions Deployed in Japan and Germany.数字公共卫生解决方案应对 COVID-19 大流行:日本和德国部署的接触者追踪解决方案的比较分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 14;25:e44966. doi: 10.2196/44966.
7
The Impact of Individuals' Social Environments on Contact Tracing App Use: Survey Study.个体社会环境对接触者追踪应用程序使用的影响:调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 May 31;10:e45825. doi: 10.2196/45825.
8
User Compliance With the Health Emergency and Disaster Management System: Systematic Literature Review.用户对卫生应急和灾害管理系统的遵从性:系统文献回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 5;25:e41168. doi: 10.2196/41168.
9
Why Individuals Do (Not) Use Contact Tracing Apps: A Health Belief Model Perspective on the German Corona-Warn-App.为何个人使用(或不使用)接触者追踪应用程序:基于健康信念模型对德国新冠预警应用程序的探讨
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 15;11(4):583. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040583.
10
Comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.新冠疫情背景下接触者追踪干预措施的效果比较:系统评价。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;38(3):243-266. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-00963-z. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
有助于新冠疫情管理的移动健康应用程序:范围综述
JMIR Nurs. 2020 Aug 6;3(1):e20596. doi: 10.2196/20596. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
4
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.基于应用程序的 COVID-19 接触者追踪的可接受性:跨国调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857. doi: 10.2196/19857.
5
Digital Health Strategies to Fight COVID-19 Worldwide: Challenges, Recommendations, and a Call for Papers.全球抗击新冠疫情的数字健康策略:挑战、建议及征稿启事
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 16;22(6):e19284. doi: 10.2196/19284.
6
Investigation of a COVID-19 outbreak in Germany resulting from a single travel-associated primary case: a case series.德国一起旅行相关原发性病例引发的 COVID-19 暴发调查:病例系列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):920-928. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30314-5. Epub 2020 May 15.
7
Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing.量化 SARS-CoV-2 传播表明数字接触者追踪可控制疫情。
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491). doi: 10.1126/science.abb6936. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
8
Willingness to Participate in Passive Mobile Data Collection.参与被动移动数据收集的意愿。
Public Opin Q. 2019 Jul;83(Suppl 1):210-235. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfz007. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
9
Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES).提高网络调查质量:互联网电子调查结果报告清单(CHERRIES)。
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34.