• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体化处方画像以减少初级保健中阿片类药物初治患者不合理使用阿片类药物镇痛:一项随机对照试验方案。

Individualized prescribing portraits to reduce inappropriate initiation of opioid analgesics to opioid naïve patients in primary care: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Department of Family Practice, Innovation Support Unit, University of British Columbia, 5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.

British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;107:106462. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106462. Epub 2021 May 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2021.106462
PMID:34082074
Abstract

Background Opioid analgesics are frequently initiated for chronic and acute pain despite weak evidence of benefit, although prescribing rates of some analgesics decreased in the context of the epidemic. In some populations, up to a quarter of opioid naïve persons prescribed opioids for non-cancer pain develop prescription opioid use disorder (OUD). Audit and feedback interventions rely on constructive use of routinely collected data to align professional behaviours and clinical practice with best evidence. These interventions have been shown to help reduce inappropriate initiation. However, effectiveness and acceptability of individualized "portraits" of physicians' prescribing patterns, to reduce inappropriate initiation of opioid analgesics to opioid naïve persons, have not been evaluated. Methods REDONNA is a mixed-methods randomized study testing the effectiveness of individualized prescribing Portraits to reduce inappropriate initiation of opioid analgesics. This intervention to improve safety of opioid prescribing in primary care in British Columbia (BC), Canada involves mailing individual prescribing portraits to an 'early group' of 2604 family physicians, followed in 6 months by a mailing to 2553 family physicians in the 'delayed group'. Primary outcome is number of new opioid prescriptions initiated in opioid naïve people, measured using administrative data from a centralized medication monitoring database covering all prescription opioids dispensed from BC community pharmacies. Secondary endpoints will compare prescribing impact between the two groups. A qualitative sub-study will examine feasibility among a purposive sample of physicians and patients. Discussion This trial provides important evidence on the intervention's potential to steer policy and practice on inappropriate opioid analgesics initiation. Trial registration: The study was registered prospectively on 30 March 2020 at the ISRCTN Register (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN34246811).

摘要

背景 尽管证据表明益处有限,但阿片类镇痛药仍常被用于慢性和急性疼痛,尽管在疫情背景下某些镇痛药的处方率有所下降。在某些人群中,高达四分之一的首次接受阿片类药物治疗的非癌性疼痛患者会出现处方阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)。审核和反馈干预措施依赖于对常规收集数据的建设性使用,以调整专业行为和临床实践与最佳证据保持一致。这些干预措施已被证明有助于减少不合理的起始治疗。然而,尚未评估针对医生处方模式的个体化“画像”以减少首次接受阿片类药物治疗的患者不合理起始使用阿片类药物的有效性和可接受性。

方法 REDONNA 是一项混合方法随机研究,旨在测试个体化处方画像以减少首次接受阿片类药物治疗的患者不合理起始使用阿片类药物的有效性。这项在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)改善初级保健中阿片类药物处方安全性的干预措施包括向 2604 名家庭医生的“早期组”邮寄个人处方画像,然后在 6 个月内向“延迟组”的 2553 名家庭医生邮寄。主要结局是通过集中药物监测数据库中的行政数据测量在首次接受阿片类药物治疗的人群中新开的阿片类药物处方数量,该数据库涵盖了从 BC 社区药房分发的所有处方阿片类药物。次要结局将比较两组之间的处方影响。一项定性子研究将在医生和患者的目的样本中检查可行性。

讨论 这项试验提供了关于该干预措施在指导政策和实践方面避免不合理起始使用阿片类镇痛药的潜力的重要证据。

试验注册

该研究于 2020 年 3 月 30 日在 ISRCTN 注册处(https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN34246811)前瞻性注册。

相似文献

1
Individualized prescribing portraits to reduce inappropriate initiation of opioid analgesics to opioid naïve patients in primary care: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.个体化处方画像以减少初级保健中阿片类药物初治患者不合理使用阿片类药物镇痛:一项随机对照试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;107:106462. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106462. Epub 2021 May 31.
2
Evaluation of audit and feedback to family physicians on prescribing of opioid analgesics to opioid-naïve patients: A pragmatic randomized delay trial.评估对使用阿片类药物的初治患者开具处方的家庭医生进行审计和反馈:一项实用随机延迟试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Nov;134:107354. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107354. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Opioid analgesic prescribing for opioid-naïve individuals prior to identification of opioid use disorder in British Columbia, Canada.在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省发现阿片类药物使用障碍之前,为阿片类药物初治个体开具阿片类镇痛药处方。
Addiction. 2021 Dec;116(12):3422-3432. doi: 10.1111/add.15515. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
4
Development and pilot evaluation of an educational session to support sparing opioid prescriptions to opioid naïve patients in a Canadian primary care setting.在加拿大初级保健环境中,开发并试点评估了一个教育课程,以支持对阿片类药物初治患者开出较少的阿片类药物处方。
Fam Pract. 2022 Nov 22;39(6):1024-1030. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac044.
5
Prescribing of Opioid Analgesics and Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder During the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间阿片类药物使用障碍的阿片类镇痛药和丁丙诺啡的处方
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216147. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6147.
6
Evaluating the intended and unintended consequences of opioid-prescribing interventions on primary care in British Columbia, Canada: protocol for a retrospective population-based cohort study.评价加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省初级保健中阿片类药物处方干预的预期和非预期后果:一项基于回顾性人群的队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 5;10(11):e038724. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038724.
7
Prescriber Education Interventions to Optimize Opioid Prescribing in Acute Care: A Systematic Review.优化急性护理中阿片类药物处方的处方教育干预措施:系统评价。
Pain Physician. 2019 Nov;22(6):E551-E562.
8
A randomized matched-pairs study of feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of systems consultation: a novel implementation strategy for adopting clinical guidelines for Opioid prescribing in primary care.一项系统咨询的可行性、可接受性和有效性的随机匹配对研究:一种在初级保健中采用阿片类药物处方临床指南的新型实施策略。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0713-1.
9
Inappropriate opioid prescribing practices: A narrative review.不适当的阿片类药物处方实践:叙述性综述。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Aug 1;76(16):1231-1237. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz092.
10
A Systematic Review of Interventions and Programs Targeting Appropriate Prescribing of Opioids.针对阿片类药物合理处方的干预措施和项目的系统评价。
Pain Physician. 2019 May;22(3):229-240.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in opioid dispensing after common abdominal and orthopedic surgery procedures in British Columbia: a retrospective cohort analysis.不列颠哥伦比亚省常见腹部和骨科手术后阿片类药物配药趋势:回顾性队列分析。
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Aug;69(8):986-996. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02272-7. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
2
Development and pilot evaluation of an educational session to support sparing opioid prescriptions to opioid naïve patients in a Canadian primary care setting.在加拿大初级保健环境中,开发并试点评估了一个教育课程,以支持对阿片类药物初治患者开出较少的阿片类药物处方。
Fam Pract. 2022 Nov 22;39(6):1024-1030. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac044.