State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 1;789:147997. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147997. Epub 2021 May 24.
The improvements of resource efficiency are crucial for economic development of a city. Currently, the variations of utilization efficiency of ecological resources have been studied much, but whether the efficiency has been good enough for driving the economy, is still unknown. Here, we introduced an efficiency dependence index (EDI) to assess the effects of utilization efficiency of land, energy and water resources on economy and evaluated the promotion potentials of resource efficiency. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region of north China was selected to validate the method. First, a non-collinear index system was built. After that, the EDI and the score of resource efficiency (SRE) index were constructed based on the generalized linear regression method. The main results were: (1) The efficiency contributions to economy in primary industry (4 of 13 cities) were far weaker than those in secondary industry (10 of 13 cities). (2) Water efficiency of primary industry in developed cities need further promotions. Energy efficiency needs more improvements especially in medium and small cities in both primary and secondary industries. (3) The efficiency utilization patterns of effective efficiency (EE), potential efficiency (PE) and no efficiency (NE) were categorized, and there were 26 of 65 (40%) counts of indicators performed EE, 31% counts of indicators presented PE and 29% counts of indicators showed NE. The improvement of water efficiency was the key driver to promote the resource efficiency. (4) By comparing current and ideal resource efficiency levels (via SRE), it showed that only 1 city reached to 80% of the ideal efficiency, 3 cities showed 70%, 4 cities showed 60% and 5 cities reached to less than 50% of the ideal resource efficiency. Policy suggestions of optimizing energy structure and pay attention to the comprehensiveness of resource efficiency were provided. This paper could serve as a reference for resource management.
提高资源效率对城市经济发展至关重要。目前,生态资源利用效率的变化已经得到了广泛研究,但效率是否足以推动经济发展仍不得而知。在这里,我们引入了一个效率依赖指数(EDI)来评估土地、能源和水资源利用效率对经济的影响,并评估资源效率的提升潜力。选择中国华北的京津冀地区来验证该方法。首先,构建了一个非共线性的指标体系。然后,基于广义线性回归方法构建了 EDI 和资源效率(SRE)指数的得分。主要结果为:(1)第一产业(13 个城市中的 4 个)的效率对经济的贡献远弱于第二产业(13 个城市中的 10 个)。(2)发达城市的第一产业用水效率有待进一步提高,能源效率需要改进,尤其是中小城市的第一产业和第二产业。(3)对有效效率(EE)、潜在效率(PE)和无效率(NE)的效率利用模式进行了分类,其中 65 个指标中有 26 个(40%)表现为 EE,31%的指标表现为 PE,29%的指标表现为 NE。提高水效率是提高资源效率的关键驱动因素。(4)通过比较当前和理想的资源效率水平(通过 SRE),结果表明只有 1 个城市达到了理想效率的 80%,3 个城市达到了 70%,4 个城市达到了 60%,5 个城市达到了 50%以下。提出了优化能源结构和注重资源效率全面性的政策建议。本文可为资源管理提供参考。