Suppr超能文献

同侧股骨颈和股骨干骨折。何时需要对髋关节进行进一步的影像筛查?

Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures. When do we need further image screening of the hip?

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Anaesthesiology, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil.

Rehabilitation Center of Clinics Hospital, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil.

出版信息

Injury. 2021 Jul;52 Suppl 3:S65-S69. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.040. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to identify patterns of femoral diaphyseal fractures which are associated with fractures of the ipsilateral femoral neck according to the AO classification. We propose an algorithm of investigation based on plain radiographs, recognizing cases that need additional screening with computed tomography.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This observational retrospective study included patients with combined diaphyseal and femoral neck fractures. These patients were retrieved from a total of 1398 patients with the diagnoses of diaphyseal fractures of the femur, who were admitted to our hospital for surgical treatment between January 2009 and October 2019. All included cases had both fractures analyzed for their geometry and were classified according to the AO Classification, seeking to find a correlation between the types of fractures.

RESULTS

Sixteen diaphyseal fractures associated with ipsilateral neck fractures were detected during the period. The distribution of the diaphyseal fractures according to the AO Classification was as follows: 5 of type A3 (31,2%) 6 type B2 (37.5%), 1 type B3 (6,2%), 2 type C2 (12,5%) and 2 type C3 (12,5%). One A2 femoral fracture occurred during the surgical procedure. No type A1 fractures were detected.

CONCLUSION

The patterns of high-energy diaphyseal fractures (A3, B and C) have a higher prevalence of associated ipsilateral neck fractures. Our study suggests that routine additional methods of image investigation of femoral neck fractures may be unnecessary for diaphyseal fractures type A1 and A2.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是根据 AO 分类,确定与同侧股骨颈骨折相关的股骨干骨折模式。我们提出了一种基于平片的检查算法,识别需要额外进行 CT 筛查的病例。

患者和方法

这是一项回顾性观察研究,纳入了股骨干和股骨颈骨折并存的患者。这些患者是从 2009 年 1 月至 2019 年 10 月期间因股骨干骨折住院接受手术治疗的 1398 名患者中检索出来的。所有纳入的病例均对其骨折几何形状进行了分析,并根据 AO 分类进行了分类,以寻找骨折类型之间的相关性。

结果

在研究期间共发现 16 例股骨干骨折合并同侧颈骨折。根据 AO 分类,股骨干骨折的分布如下:A3 型 5 例(31.2%)、B2 型 6 例(37.5%)、B3 型 1 例(6.2%)、C2 型 2 例(12.5%)和 C3 型 2 例(12.5%)。在手术过程中还发生了 1 例 A2 型股骨骨折。未发现 A1 型骨折。

结论

高能股骨干骨折(A3、B 和 C 型)更易合并同侧颈骨折。我们的研究表明,对于 A1 和 A2 型股骨干骨折,常规进行额外的股骨颈骨折影像学检查可能是不必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验