Ferguson Jamie, Alexander Myriam, Bruce Stuart, O'Connell Matthew, Beecroft Sue, McNally Martin
Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 7HE, UK.
Open Vie, Marlow, UK.
J Bone Jt Infect. 2021 Apr 28;6(5):151-163. doi: 10.5194/jbji-6-151-2021. eCollection 2021.
: An investigation of the impact of a multidisciplinary bone infection unit (BIU) undertaking osteomyelitis surgery with a single-stage protocol on clinical outcomes and healthcare utilisation compared to national outcomes in England. : A tertiary referral multidisciplinary BIU was compared to the rest of England (ROE) and a subset of the 10 next busiest centres based on osteomyelitis treatment episode volume (Top Ten), using the Hospital Episodes Statistics database (HES). A total of 25 006 patients undergoing osteomyelitis surgery between April 2013 and March 2017 were included. Data on secondary healthcare resource utilisation and clinical indicators were extracted for 24 months before and after surgery. : Patients treated at the BIU had higher orthopaedic healthcare utilisation in the 2 years prior to their index procedure, with more admissions ( 0.001) and a mean length of stay (LOS) over 4 times longer than other groups (10.99 d, compared to 2.79 d for Top Ten and 2.46 d for the ROE, 0.001). During the index inpatient period, the BIU had fewer mean theatre visits (1.25) compared to the TT (1.98, 0.001) and the ROE (1.64, 0.001). The index inpatient period was shorter in the BIU (11.84 d), 33.6 % less than the Top Ten (17.83 d, 0.001) and 29.9 % shorter than the ROE (16.88 d, 0.001). During follow-up, BIU patients underwent fewer osteomyelitis-related reoperations than Top Ten centres ( 0.0139) and the ROE ( 0.0137). Mortality was lower (4.71 %) compared to the Top Ten (20.06 %, 0.001) and the ROE (22.63 %, 0.001). The cumulative BIU total amputation rate was lower (6.47 %) compared to the Top Ten (15.96 %, 0.001) and the ROE (12.71 %, 0.001). Overall healthcare utilisation was lower in the BIU for all inpatient admissions, LOS, and Accident and Emergency (A&E) attendances. : The benefits of managing osteomyelitis in a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) specialist setting included reduced hospital stays, lower reoperation rates for infection recurrence, improved survival, lower amputation rates, and lower overall healthcare utilisation. These results support the establishment of centrally funded multidisciplinary bone infection units that will improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare utilisation.
一项关于多学科骨感染单元(BIU)采用单阶段方案进行骨髓炎手术对临床结局和医疗资源利用的影响的调查,并与英格兰的全国性结果进行比较。:使用医院 Episode 统计数据库(HES),将一个三级转诊多学科 BIU 与英格兰其他地区(ROE)以及根据骨髓炎治疗发作量确定的 10 个次繁忙中心的子集(前十大)进行比较。纳入了 2013 年 4 月至 2017 年 3 月期间接受骨髓炎手术的总共 25006 名患者。提取了手术前后 24 个月的二级医疗资源利用和临床指标数据。:在其索引手术前的 2 年中,在 BIU 接受治疗的患者骨科医疗资源利用率更高,入院次数更多(P<0.001),平均住院时间比其他组长 4 倍多(10.99 天,前十大组为 2.79 天,ROE 组为 2.46 天,P<0.001)。在索引住院期间,BIU 的平均手术次数(1.25 次)少于前十大组(1.98 次,P<0.001)和 ROE 组(1.64 次,P<0.001)。BIU 的索引住院时间较短(11.84 天),比前十大组少 33.6%(17.83 天,P<0.001),比 ROE 组短 29.9%(16.88 天,P<0.001)。在随访期间,BIU 患者与骨髓炎相关的再次手术次数少于前十大中心(P<0.0139)和 ROE 组(P<0.0137)。死亡率低于前十大组(20.06%,P<0.001)和 ROE 组(22.63%,P<0.001)(4.71%)。BIU 的累计总截肢率低于前十大组(15.96%,P<0.001)和 ROE 组(12.71%,P<0.001)(6.47%)。对于所有住院入院、住院时间和急诊(A&E)就诊情况,BIU 的总体医疗资源利用较低。:在多学科团队(MDT)专科环境中管理骨髓炎的益处包括缩短住院时间、降低感染复发的再次手术率、提高生存率、降低截肢率以及降低总体医疗资源利用。这些结果支持建立由中央资助的多学科骨感染单元,这将改善患者结局并减少医疗资源利用。