• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估虚弱程度可以指导决策,以决定是否在厚型黑色素瘤患者中使用前哨淋巴结活检。

Assessment of Frailty Can Guide Decision Making for Utilization of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Thick Melanoma.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):9031-9038. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10212-w. Epub 2021 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-021-10212-w
PMID:34085141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8595504/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is often omitted in selected patients with advanced primary melanoma, although the justification/criteria for omission have been debated.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether assessment of frailty could serve as an objective marker to guide selection for SLNB in patients with advanced primary melanoma.

METHODS

Patients presenting with clinical stage IIC (ulcerated, > 4 mm Breslow thickness) cutaneous melanoma from January 1999 through June 2019 were included. Frailty was assessed using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Frailty Index (MSK FI), a composite score of functional status and medical comorbidities. Five-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Cox regression, and predictors of OS were identified using competing risk models.

RESULTS

MSS did not differ between patients who did (n = 451) or did not undergo SLNB (n = 179) [63.2% vs. 65.0%, p = 0.14]; however, omission of SLNB was associated with decreased 5-year OS (29% vs. 44%, p < 0.001). In a multivariable competing risk model, selection for SLNB omission was an independent predictor of death from non-melanoma causes (hazard ratio [HR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.3, p < 0.001). After incorporation of the MSK FI score into the multivariable model in this subset, MSK FI (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-4.1, p < 0.001), but not SLNB omission, was an independent predictor of poorer OS.

CONCLUSION

We observed worse OS in patients with thick melanoma selected not to undergo SLNB, which was attributed to death due to non-melanoma causes. Formal assessment of frailty may provide an objective prognostic measure to guide selective use of SLNB in these patients.

摘要

背景

在某些选择的晚期原发性黑色素瘤患者中,通常会省略前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB),尽管省略的依据/标准存在争议。

目的

我们旨在确定虚弱评估是否可作为指导晚期原发性黑色素瘤患者 SLNB 选择的客观标志物。

方法

纳入 1999 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月期间就诊的临床分期为 IIC 期(溃疡,>4mm Breslow 厚度)皮肤黑色素瘤患者。使用 Memorial Sloan Kettering 虚弱指数(MSK FI)评估虚弱情况,该指数是功能状态和合并症的综合评分。使用 Cox 回归估计 5 年黑色素瘤特异性生存率(MSS)和总生存率(OS),使用竞争风险模型确定 OS 的预测因素。

结果

接受 SLNB(n=451)或未接受 SLNB(n=179)的患者之间的 MSS 无差异[63.2% vs. 65.0%,p=0.14];然而,省略 SLNB 与 5 年 OS 降低相关(29% vs. 44%,p<0.001)。在多变量竞争风险模型中,选择省略 SLNB 是因非黑色素瘤原因死亡的独立预测因素(风险比[HR] 1.7,95%置信区间[CI] 1.2-2.3,p<0.001)。在前哨淋巴结活检组中纳入 MSK FI 评分后,MSK FI(HR 2.4,95% CI 1.5-4.1,p<0.001),而不是省略 SLNB,是 OS 较差的独立预测因素。

结论

我们观察到未接受 SLNB 的厚型黑色素瘤患者 OS 更差,这归因于非黑色素瘤原因导致的死亡。对虚弱进行正式评估可能为指导这些患者选择性使用 SLNB 提供客观的预后指标。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Frailty Can Guide Decision Making for Utilization of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Thick Melanoma.评估虚弱程度可以指导决策,以决定是否在厚型黑色素瘤患者中使用前哨淋巴结活检。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):9031-9038. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10212-w. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
2
The Prognostic Significance of Sentinel Lymph Node Status for Patients with Thick Melanoma.前哨淋巴结状态对厚皮黑色素瘤患者的预后意义
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(Suppl 5):938-945. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5502-y. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
3
Omission of Completion Lymph Node Dissection in Sentinel Node Biopsy Positive Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma Patients.前哨淋巴结活检阳性的头颈部皮肤黑色素瘤患者省略根治性淋巴结清扫术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):7671-7685. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14036-8. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
4
Is sentinel lymph node biopsy needed for lentigo maligna melanoma?恶性雀斑样痣黑色素瘤需要进行前哨淋巴结活检吗?
J Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar;129(4):804-812. doi: 10.1002/jso.27543. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
5
The Utility of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Elderly Patients with Melanoma.前哨淋巴结活检在老年黑色素瘤患者中的应用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov;31(12):8230-8239. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15684-0. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
6
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma: Long-term Outcomes, Prognostic Value, Accuracy, and Safety.头颈部黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检:长期结果、预后价值、准确性和安全性。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Apr;162(4):520-529. doi: 10.1177/0194599819899934. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
7
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Is Prognostic in Thickest Melanoma Cases and Should Be Performed for Thick Melanomas.前哨淋巴结活检对最厚的黑色素瘤病例具有预后意义,应在厚型黑色素瘤中进行。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;28(2):1007-1016. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08706-0. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
Completion lymph node dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node positive cutaneous head and neck melanoma.前哨淋巴结阳性的皮肤头颈部黑色素瘤患者的完全淋巴结清扫术。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov;122(6):1057-1065. doi: 10.1002/jso.26119. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
9
Use and Costs of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Non-Ulcerated T1b Melanoma: Analysis of a Population-Based Registry.非溃疡性 T1b 黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检的应用和成本:基于人群登记处的分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;28(7):3470-3478. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09998-6. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
10
Impact of Completion Lymph Node Dissection on Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Melanoma.前哨淋巴结活检阳性的黑色素瘤患者完成淋巴结清扫术的影响
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jul;223(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.01.045. Epub 2016 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Frailty Index Can Predict the Short-Term Outcomes of Esophagectomy in Older Patients with Esophageal Cancer.一种新的虚弱指数可预测老年食管癌患者接受食管癌切除术的短期预后。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Aug 16;31(8):4685-4694. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31080349.
2
Predictors of complication after groin dissection: a single-centre experience.腹股沟解剖后并发症的预测因素:单中心经验。
Can J Surg. 2024 May 1;67(3):E198-E205. doi: 10.1503/cjs.012022. Print 2024 May-Jun.