Reproductive Medical Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210011, China.
Center for Reproduction and Genetics, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, 215002, China.
Reprod Sci. 2021 Nov;28(11):3193-3199. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00639-7. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
There is currently a dispute over the choice of ovulation induction treatment for infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The objective of this study is to compare the therapeutic effect of pulsed rhythmic administration protocol (PRAP) with conventional letrozole + human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) in patients with clomiphene-resistance polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). A retrospective analysis of 821 intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles between January 2015 and January 2020 was performed. Of these, 483 cycles were treated with a pulsed rhythmic administration protocol (PRAP), and 338 cycles were treated with conventional letrozole + HMG protocol (LHP). The therapeutic effect of the two protocols has been compared. The pregnancy rate was 18.07% in the LHP and 27.07% in the PRAP. The ongoing pregnancy rate in LHP was 14.46% and in PRAP was 22.73%. The research suggests that PRAP is more effective than LHP and could be an adequate ovulation induction strategy for the IUI cycle of patients with clomiphene-resistance PCOS.
目前,对于多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)不孕妇女的排卵诱导治疗选择存在争议。本研究旨在比较脉冲式节律给药方案(PRAP)与常规来曲唑+人绝经期促性腺激素(HMG)在氯米酚抵抗型多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者中的治疗效果。对 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月期间的 821 个宫腔内人工授精(IUI)周期进行了回顾性分析。其中,483 个周期采用脉冲式节律给药方案(PRAP)治疗,338 个周期采用常规来曲唑+HMG 方案(LHP)治疗。比较了两种方案的治疗效果。LHP 的妊娠率为 18.07%,PRAP 的妊娠率为 27.07%。LHP 的持续妊娠率为 14.46%,PRAP 的持续妊娠率为 22.73%。研究表明,PRAP 比 LHP 更有效,可能是氯米酚抵抗型 PCOS 患者 IUI 周期的一种合适的排卵诱导策略。