• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

GRADE方法,第2部分:健康决策制定的证据到决策框架

The GRADE approach, Part 2: Evidence to decision frameworksoutlining decision-making in health.

作者信息

Quilodrán Carlos, Kirmayr Matías, Valente Bárbara, Pérez-Bracchiglione Javier, Garegnani Luis, Franco Juan Víctor Ariel

机构信息

Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile. ORCID: 0000-0001-9150-0323.

Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile. ORCID: 0000-0002-3675-3739.

出版信息

Medwave. 2021 May 7;21(4):e8182. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2021.04.8182.

DOI:10.5867/medwave.2021.04.8182
PMID:34086664
Abstract

The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology provides a framework for assessing the certainty of the evidence and making recommendations. The Evidence to Decision Framework (EtD) is a transparent and structured system for formulating health recommendations. Once the problem is identified and the certainty of the evidence is assessed, EtD provides several criteria for formulating a recommendation. These criteria include the trade-off between benefits and harms, patients values and preferences, acceptability, feasibility, resource use, and impact on equity. The resulting recommendations may differ in strength (strong or weak) and direction (for or against). The process is transparent, allowing other users to adjust the framework of recommendations by modifying the criteria to fit the desired context through an adaptation-adoption process. Given the extensive information available on EtD and the GRADE methodology in general, this narrative review seeks to explain the main concepts involved in decision-making in health by using simplified and friendly descriptions, accompanied by practical examples, thus facilitating its understanding by inexperienced readers.

摘要

GRADE(推荐分级评估、制定与评价)方法提供了一个评估证据确定性并提出建议的框架。证据到决策框架(EtD)是一种用于制定健康建议的透明且结构化的系统。一旦确定了问题并评估了证据的确定性,EtD就会提供几个制定建议的标准。这些标准包括利弊权衡、患者的价值观和偏好、可接受性、可行性、资源利用以及对公平性的影响。由此产生的建议在强度(强或弱)和方向(支持或反对)上可能会有所不同。该过程是透明的,允许其他用户通过适应 - 采用过程修改标准以适应期望的背景,从而调整建议框架。鉴于总体上有关于EtD和GRADE方法的大量可用信息,本叙述性综述旨在通过使用简化且通俗易懂的描述,并辅以实际例子,来解释健康决策中涉及的主要概念,从而便于缺乏经验的读者理解。

相似文献

1
The GRADE approach, Part 2: Evidence to decision frameworksoutlining decision-making in health.GRADE方法,第2部分:健康决策制定的证据到决策框架
Medwave. 2021 May 7;21(4):e8182. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2021.04.8182.
2
Evidence to Decision framework provides a structured "roadmap" for making GRADE guidelines recommendations.证据决策框架为制定 GRADE 指南建议提供了结构化的“路线图”。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Dec;104:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
3
[GRADE: Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks - a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical guidelines].[分级:证据到决策(EtD)框架——一种做出明智医疗选择的系统且透明的方法。2:临床指南]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Mar;140:63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
4
The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions.卫生系统和公共卫生决策中的 GRADE 证据决策(EtD)框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 May 29;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0320-2.
5
Evidence-based urology: understanding GRADE methodology.循证泌尿外科学:理解 GRADE 方法学。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Nov;7(6):1230-1233. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.09.014. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
6
Evidence to decision frameworks enabled structured and explicit development of healthcare recommendations.证据到决策框架有助于医疗保健建议的结构化和明确制定。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.06.004. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
7
Evidence-to-decision frameworks: a review and analysis to inform decision-making for environmental health interventions.证据决策框架:为环境健康干预措施的决策提供信息的综述与分析。
Environ Health. 2021 Dec 8;20(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00794-z.
8
Making the GRADE in anaphylaxis management: Toward recommendations integrating values, preferences, context, and shared decision making.在过敏管理中取得进展:制定整合价值观、偏好、背景和共同决策的建议。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Jun;124(6):526-535.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
[GRADE: Using evidence to decision frameworks for adoption, adaptation and de novo generation of trustworthy guideline recommendations - GRADE-ADOLOPMENT].[GRADE:运用证据制定决策框架以采用、改编和全新生成可信的指南推荐——GRADE制定]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Aug;144-145:90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
10
[GRADE: Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks - a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction].[分级:证据到决策(EtD)框架——一种做出明智医疗选择的系统且透明的方法。1:引言]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Jul;134:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Brief interventions for suicidal ideation in primary care: a systematic review.基层医疗中针对自杀意念的简短干预措施:一项系统评价
BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 15;26(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02848-4.
2
Comparison of rapid versus slow maxillary expansion on patient-reported outcome measures in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.快速上颌扩张与慢速上颌扩张对生长患者患者报告结局测量的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prog Orthod. 2022 Dec 12;23(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00440-5.
3
for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
用于治疗良性前列腺增生引起的下尿路症状:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Investig Clin Urol. 2021 Sep;62(5):520-534. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210254.