• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

想象中的捐赠:图片是否影响保护筹款?

Picturing donations: Do images influence conservation fundraising?

机构信息

School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.

Department of Science and Education, Zoomarine, Algarve, Albufeira, Portugal.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0251882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251882. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0251882
PMID:34086695
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8177415/
Abstract

Many environmental organizations use photographic images to engage donors and supporters. While images play a role in fundraising, visual framing remains understudied in the environmental field. Few real-world experiments have examined which types of images result in higher donations to biodiversity conservation. We examined the role of images in conservation fundraising through a public experiment at Zoomarine, a marine park located in southern Portugal. Zoomarine runs a program called Dolphin Emotions where visitors pay to learn about dolphin biology and to interact with dolphins. We placed a donation box and a large informational poster about the Marine Megafauna Foundation, a conservation partner, in the lounge of the Dolphin Emotions program, which is open to participants and their families. The text on the poster, which solicited donations for the Marine Megafauna Foundation, was held constant, while four different image conditions were tested: dolphins, ocean wildlife, children, and people staring out from the poster (i.e., "watching eyes"). Each image condition was displayed for three days at a time and was on display for at least seven randomly assigned three-day periods over the course of 91 days. 20,944 visitors passed the donation box and the four poster conditions during this time and a total of € 952.40 was collected. The differences in mean donations in € per visitor per 3-day period were not statistically significant, F(3, 25) = 0.745, p = 0.54. Thus, we did not find that different images had a significant influence on donations to conservation. This may be due to our choice of visual frames or to the use of a donation box, which is a passive fundraising channel. Future research should examine how visual framing influences donations in other public settings and should test the influence of other visual frames on philanthropic behavior.

摘要

许多环境组织使用摄影图像来吸引捐赠者和支持者。虽然图像在筹款中发挥了作用,但在环境领域,视觉框架仍然研究不足。很少有真实世界的实验研究过哪种类型的图像会导致对生物多样性保护的更高捐赠。我们通过在葡萄牙南部的海洋公园 Zoomarine 进行的公开实验,研究了图像在保护筹款中的作用。Zoomarine 运行着一个名为“海豚情感”的项目,游客可以付费了解海豚生物学并与海豚互动。我们在“海豚情感”项目的休息室里放置了一个捐款箱和一张关于海洋巨兽基金会的大型信息海报,该基金会是保护合作伙伴。海报上的文字是不变的,而测试了四种不同的图像条件:海豚、海洋野生动物、儿童和从海报上向外看的人(即“凝视的眼睛”)。每种图像条件每次展示三天,在 91 天的时间内,至少有七个随机分配的三天期展示。在这段时间里,有 20944 名游客经过捐款箱和四张海报条件,共募集到 952.40 欧元。每个访客每 3 天期间的平均捐款差异在€没有统计学意义,F(3, 25) = 0.745, p = 0.54。因此,我们没有发现不同的图像对保护捐赠有显著影响。这可能是由于我们选择的视觉框架或使用捐款箱,这是一种被动的筹款渠道。未来的研究应该研究视觉框架如何影响其他公共环境中的捐赠,并测试其他视觉框架对慈善行为的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9798/8177415/6aa92d93d91f/pone.0251882.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9798/8177415/be3ddf77027a/pone.0251882.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9798/8177415/eaab332dce3a/pone.0251882.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9798/8177415/6aa92d93d91f/pone.0251882.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9798/8177415/be3ddf77027a/pone.0251882.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9798/8177415/eaab332dce3a/pone.0251882.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9798/8177415/6aa92d93d91f/pone.0251882.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Picturing donations: Do images influence conservation fundraising?想象中的捐赠:图片是否影响保护筹款?
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0251882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251882. eCollection 2021.
2
Virtual reality as a tool for environmental conservation and fundraising.虚拟现实作为环境保护和筹款的工具。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 6;15(4):e0223631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223631. eCollection 2020.
3
Why do people donate to conservation? Insights from a 'real world' campaign.人们为何为环境保护事业捐款?来自一项“真实世界”活动的见解。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):e0191888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191888. eCollection 2018.
4
How does Australia's largest dolphin-watching industry affect the behaviour of a small and resident population of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins?澳大利亚最大的赏豚业如何影响少量本地居留印太瓶鼻海豚的行为?
J Environ Manage. 2012 Apr 30;97:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Dec 24.
5
Dolphin shows and interaction programs: benefits for conservation education?海豚表演和互动项目:对保护教育有好处吗?
Zoo Biol. 2013 Jan-Feb;32(1):45-53. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21016. Epub 2012 May 23.
6
A landscape of conservation philanthropy for U.S. land trusts.美国土地信托的保护慈善事业全景图。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Feb;33(1):176-184. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13146. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
7
Nudging tourists to donate for conservation: Experimental evidence on soliciting voluntary contributions for coastal management.引导游客为保护事业捐款:沿海管理中征求自愿捐款的实验证据。
J Environ Manage. 2019 May 1;237:30-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
8
Behavioral economics. Avoiding overhead aversion in charity.行为经济学。避免慈善中的管理费用厌恶。
Science. 2014 Oct 31;346(6209):632-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1253932.
9
Crowdfunding biodiversity conservation.众筹保护生物多样性。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Dec;32(6):1426-1435. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13144. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
10
An investigation of the impact of Melbourne Zoo's "Seal-the-Loop" donate call-to-action on visitor satisfaction and behavior.关于墨尔本动物园“闭环捐赠”行动呼吁对游客满意度和行为影响的调查。
Zoo Biol. 2017 May;36(3):237-242. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21365. Epub 2017 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Effective Engagement Techniques Across the Agricultural Conservation Practice Adoption Process.农业保护实践采用过程中的有效参与技术。
Environ Manage. 2024 Dec;74(6):1173-1189. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-02043-8. Epub 2024 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

1
A scoping review into the impact of animal imagery on pro-environmental outcomes.动物意象对环保行为影响的范围综述。
Ambio. 2020 Jun;49(6):1135-1145. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01271-1. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
2
Eyes, More Than Other Facial Features, Enhance Real-World Donation Behavior.眼睛,比其他面部特征更能增强现实世界的捐赠行为。
Hum Nat. 2018 Dec;29(4):390-401. doi: 10.1007/s12110-018-9327-1.
3
Why do people donate to conservation? Insights from a 'real world' campaign.人们为何为环境保护事业捐款?来自一项“真实世界”活动的见解。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):e0191888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191888. eCollection 2018.
4
Watching Eyes effects: When others meet the self.注视效应:他人与自我相遇时。
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Oct;45:184-197. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
5
The Neuroscience of Intergroup Relations: An Integrative Review.《群体间关系的神经科学:综合述评》。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 May;9(3):245-74. doi: 10.1177/1745691614527464.
6
Effects of watching eyes and norm cues on charitable giving in a surreptitious behavioral experiment.一项秘密行为实验中注视眼睛和规范线索对慈善捐赠的影响
Evol Psychol. 2014 Oct 20;12(5):878-87. doi: 10.1177/147470491401200502.
7
Do images of 'watching eyes' induce behaviour that is more pro-social or more normative? A field experiment on littering.“注视的眼睛”图片会引发更具亲社会性或更符合规范的行为吗?一项关于乱扔垃圾的实地实验。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 5;8(12):e82055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082055. eCollection 2013.
8
Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting.被注视的暗示会增强现实世界中的合作。
Biol Lett. 2006 Sep 22;2(3):412-4. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0509.
9
Effects of picture and even-a-penny-will-help appeals on anonymous donations to charity.图片及“积少成多”呼吁对慈善匿名捐赠的影响。
Psychol Rep. 2000 Apr;86(2):551-9. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2000.86.2.551.