Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 42, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 42, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Environ Res. 2021 Sep;200:111436. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111436. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
Allergenicity indices are a powerful tool to assess the health hazard posed by urban parks to pollen allergic subjects. Nonetheless, only few indices have been developed and applied to urban vegetation in the last decade, and they were never compared nor standardised over the same dataset. To address this issue, in this paper the two best-known allergenicity indices, the Urban Green Zones Allergenicity Index (I) and the Specific Allergenicity Index (SAI), have been calculated for the same park (the Botanical Garden of Bologna), collecting vegetation data through both systematic sampling and arboreal census. The results obtained with the two data collection methods were comparable for both indices, indicating systematic sampling as a reliable approximation of the total census. Besides, the allergenic risk resulted moderate to high according to SAI, and very low according to I. Since SAI does not consider the total volume of the vegetation, it was deemed less reliable than I in evaluating the allergenicity of an enclosed green space.
致敏指数是评估城市公园花粉过敏人群健康危害的有力工具。然而,在过去的十年中,只有少数几个指数被开发并应用于城市植被,而且它们从未在同一数据集上进行过比较或标准化。为了解决这个问题,本文计算了两个最著名的致敏指数,即城市绿地致敏指数(I)和特定致敏指数(SAI),用于同一个公园(博洛尼亚植物园),通过系统采样和树木普查收集植被数据。两种数据收集方法得到的结果对于这两个指数都是可比的,表明系统采样是总普查的可靠近似值。此外,根据 SAI,致敏风险为中等到高,根据 I 则为非常低。由于 SAI 不考虑植被的总体积,因此在评估封闭绿地的致敏性方面,它被认为不如 I 可靠。